Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 85 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 49 | 59 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 78 | 95 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 109 | 133 | 163 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a fascinating study in bottleneck dynamics within the horror title Downfall. The data indicates a system where the high-end CPU provides ample headroom, but the GPU’s capabilities become the defining factor for visual fidelity and frame rate, particularly at higher resolutions. The measured results show a clear hierarchy of performance across settings and resolutions, revealing where this specific combination operates most efficiently.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark data for this combo shows a clear performance hierarchy across the four available presets, with the most balanced experience found at the Medium preset. At 1080p, the Medium setting delivers an average of 133 FPS, which is only 18% lower than the Low preset's 163 FPS, while providing a substantial visual quality upgrade. More importantly, the Medium preset is the only one at 1080p that includes frame time data, with a measured range of 113 to 153 FPS, indicating stable and consistent frame delivery that avoids the potential for stutter. The High preset at 109 FPS is also playable, but the drop from Medium is steeper than the drop from High to Low, suggesting that Medium offers the best trade-off between visual fidelity and performance headroom.
Moving to 1440p, the Medium preset again emerges as the optimal choice, producing an average of 95 FPS with a similarly stable frame window between 81 and 110 FPS. This maintains a smooth experience above the 60 FPS threshold, which is critical for a game in the horror genre where motion fluidity contributes significantly to the atmosphere. While the High preset at 78 FPS is technically playable, it leaves less margin for demanding scenes, and the Ultra preset’s 49 FPS average falls below the preferred threshold for a consistently smooth experience. At 4K, the data tells a different story; the Medium preset’s 59 FPS average is borderline, and the frame range of 50 to 68 FPS suggests occasional dips that could be noticeable. For a strict 60 FPS target at 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option, delivering 72 FPS on average.
For the best overall experience, the data suggests prioritizing the Medium preset at both 1080p and 1440p. This configuration provides the highest visual quality while maintaining frame rates that are comfortably above 60 FPS, with the 1440p Medium option offering a near-ideal balance of sharpness and smoothness for this hardware combination. At 4K, users should accept either the visual compromises of the Low preset for smoothness or the performance compromises of the Medium preset for better image quality, as the Ultra preset at 30 FPS is not recommended for active gameplay.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570’s specifications heavily influence the performance profile observed in Downfall. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides a 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is a critical resource for a modern game at higher resolutions. The data suggests that at 4K, the GPU’s memory subsystem and raw compute power become the primary limiting factor. The transition from Medium (59 FPS) to Ultra (30 FPS) at 4K represents a 49% performance drop, which is a far more severe penalty than the 29% drop seen when moving from Medium to Ultra at 1080p (from 133 to 68 FPS). This indicates that the higher resolution’s demands overwhelm the GPU’s capabilities, a conclusion supported by the GPU’s modest 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database.
The GPU’s clock speeds are listed with a base and boost of 2500 MHz, which is the same figure for both, suggesting a fixed operating point. This consistent clock means that performance scaling is entirely dependent on other factors like memory bandwidth and shader count. With 2304 shading units and an FP32 compute rating of 11.52 TFLOPS, the B570 has a finite amount of processing power. The benchmark results show that the GPU can handle the game’s load at lower resolutions and settings, but it reaches its ceiling as the pixel count increases. The data points to a scenario where the GPU is the decisive component in this pairing for Downfall, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid becoming the primary bottleneck until frame rates reach very high levels.
The GPU’s performance class is further contextualized by its nearest rivals, which include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.1% respectively. This puts the B570’s raw compute power in the same tier as those products. However, the measured FPS in Downfall shows that this level of performance is sufficient for high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but it is not equipped for high-fidelity 4K gaming, as evidenced by the 30 FPS average at the Ultra preset. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM capacity is a notable asset, but the data shows that it is the overall compute and bandwidth limitations that dictate the game’s performance envelope.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, which clearly illustrates the shift in system bottleneck. At the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 163 at 1080p to 116 at 1440p, a 29% decrease. Continuing to 4K, the average further drops to 72 FPS, which is a 56% decrease from the 1440p figure and a 56% decrease from the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is struggling to keep pace with the increasing pixel count, and its limitations become more apparent at higher resolutions.
At the Medium preset, the scaling is similar. The average FPS goes from 133 at 1080p to 95 at 1440p, a 29% drop, and then to 59 at 4K, a 38% drop from 1440p. This pattern shows that the performance cost of moving to 4K is significant regardless of the preset. The High preset follows the same trend, with averages of 109 FPS at 1080p, 78 FPS at 1440p, and 49 FPS at 4K. The most dramatic scaling occurs at the Ultra preset, where the average FPS falls from 68 at 1080p to 49 at 1440p (a 28% drop) and then to 30 FPS at 4K, which is a 39% drop from 1440p and a 56% drop from 1080p.
This data strongly suggests that the system is GPU-limited in Downfall across all tested configurations. The consistent proportional drops in performance when moving between resolutions indicate that the CPU is not a limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, as the CPU workload would not increase proportionally with resolution. Instead, the frame rates scale almost linearly with the number of pixels being rendered, pointing directly to the Intel Arc B570 as the performance ceiling. The i9-14900K, with its high core count and boost clock of 6.00 GHz, is more than capable of feeding the GPU with data, but the GPU’s rendering throughput is what ultimately determines the final frame rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 163 FPS, providing the highest possible frame rate for competitive or high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset is the most balanced, with an average of 133 FPS and a measured frame range of 113 to 153 FPS, showing good consistency. The High preset yields an average of 109 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 68 FPS, which remains playable but shows a significant drop from the other presets.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset maintains a high average of 116 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience. The Medium preset again proves to be the sweet spot, with an average of 95 FPS and a frame range of 81 to 110 FPS, which is still well within the smooth territory. The High preset delivers 78 FPS on average, which is acceptable for most players. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 49 FPS, which begins to compromise the smoothness of the experience in a fast-paced horror game.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become evident. The Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently playable experience, with an average of 72 FPS. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS, with a frame range of 50 to 68 FPS, indicating that it will dip below 60 FPS at times. The High preset averages 49 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable, with an average of just 30 FPS. The data clearly shows that this combination is not suited for high-fidelity 4K gaming, and users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2988th out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the bottom 20% of all systems tested, which is a surprising result given the high-end nature of the CPU. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance ceiling. While the CPU is a top-tier component, with an average benchmark score of 79097 and a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, the GPU's average score of 20556 and 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs holds the system back.
The CPU’s performance is confirmed by its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average score of 79097, which is only 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900KF and 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus. This indicates that the CPU is performing as expected and is not a source of any bottleneck. Conversely, the GPU is situated among more mid-range competitors, with its average score being only 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750. The low combo rank is therefore almost entirely attributable to the GPU’s inability to keep up with the CPU’s potential in this specific game title.
The data indicates a significant imbalance in this pairing for Downfall. The system’s frame rates are consistently limited by the Arc B570, preventing the i9-14900K from demonstrating its full gaming prowess. This is a classic example of a CPU-heavy build with a GPU that is not powerful enough to translate that processing power into high frame rates at demanding settings, resulting in a low overall ranking compared to more balanced configurations.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this system?
A: The data shows that the 1440p Medium preset is the most balanced, providing an average of 95 FPS with a stable frame range of 81 to 110 FPS. This offers a sharp image and smooth gameplay without requiring the visual compromises of the Low preset.
*Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K the limiting factor in this system for Downfall?*
A: No. The benchmark results show that the CPU is not the bottleneck. The frame rates scale almost linearly with resolution, which is a characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU is performing in the top 5% of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 perform relative to its closest competitors?
A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is nearly identical to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.1% respectively. Its performance is effectively on par with these products.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: The data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable at the Low preset, which yields an average of 72 FPS. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS, which will dip below 60 FPS, and the Ultra preset is not playable at 30 FPS.
Q: What is the frame rate range at the Medium preset in 1080p?
A: At 1080p with the Medium preset, the system achieves an average of 133 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, indicating very consistent performance.
Q: How does the combo rank compared to all other tested systems?
A: This combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2988th out of 3716 tested combinations for Downfall, placing it in the lower percentile of systems due to the GPU's performance ceiling.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i9-14900K
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B570 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 95.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 49.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 133.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 109.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.0 |
Downfall with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii9-14900K + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.