Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a robust performance profile in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. The measured data shows that this combination is capable of high frame rates across most settings, though the Ultra preset creates a significant bottleneck. With an average FPS ranging from 55 at 4K Ultra to 295 at 1080p Low, the system demonstrates a clear preference for lower resolutions and less demanding graphical presets. This analysis breaks down the specific performance metrics, scaling behavior, and component roles based on the provided database entries.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?*

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 provides the highest performance, with an average of 295 FPS at Low settings and 198 FPS at High settings. 2560x1440 also remains highly playable, with averages between 88 and 210 FPS across all settings.

Q: How does the Ultra preset affect performance compared to High?

A: The Ultra preset causes a significant performance drop. At 3840x2160, the average FPS falls from 88 on High to 55 on Ultra, a 37.5% reduction. Similarly, at 2560x1440, it drops from 141 to 88, and at 1920x1080 from 198 to 123.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, lowering settings from High to Low increases the average FPS from 198 to 295. This indicates the graphics card’s workload is the main variable, as the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to keep up with the frame rates.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures recorded for this combo?

A: The database only includes minimum FPS values for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 205 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 146 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 91 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9070’s average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, scores 24063, which is 0.8% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, which is 1.2% higher.

*Q: What is the performance rank of this specific combo in Downfall?*

A: This combo ranks 1122 out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the top 30.2% of all tested systems for this game.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in determining frame rates across different settings. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This large memory pool is more than sufficient for a 2016 title like Downfall, even at 4K resolution. The GPU’s clock speeds include a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s raw compute capabilities. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539. The Passmark G3D score of 25381 places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 23877, which puts it 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800S and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. These figures indicate that the RX 9070 is a mid-to-high-tier performer.

In the context of Downfall, the GPU’s role is clear. The frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra settings is substantial. At 1440p, the average FPS drops from 210 on Low to 88 on Ultra. This 58% reduction in performance is directly attributable to the increased graphical workload on the GPU. The data suggests that the RX 9070 is the component that dictates the playable settings envelope for this game, as the CPU is less likely to be the bottleneck given the high frame rates achieved.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. The performance drop is consistent across all settings, but the magnitude varies.

At Low settings, the average FPS decreases from 295 at 1080p to 210 at 1440p (a 28.8% drop), and then to 131 at 4K (a 37.6% drop from 1440p). This steep decline indicates that the GPU is being increasingly taxed by the pixel count. At High settings, the trend is similar: 198 FPS at 1080p, 141 FPS at 1440p (a 28.8% drop), and 88 FPS at 4K (a 37.6% drop from 1440p).

The Medium settings show a similar pattern. The average FPS is 241 at 1080p, 172 at 1440p, and 107 at 4K. This represents a 28.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 37.8% drop from 1440p to 4K. The consistency of these percentages across settings suggests that the resolution scaling is primarily a function of the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth, not the CPU.

The limiting component is clearly the GPU. The CPU’s performance, as measured by its 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628, is sufficient to maintain high frame rates. The fact that the frame rate drops by roughly the same percentage regardless of graphical settings points to a pixel-bound scenario. The RX 9070’s 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth is likely the constraint at higher resolutions, as the game engine needs to access texture data more frequently.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database provides average FPS for four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at three resolutions. No maximum or minimum FPS values are listed for most settings, but the Medium preset includes them.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

• Low: 295 average FPS.
• Medium: 241 average FPS, with a minimum of 205 and a maximum of 277.
• High: 198 average FPS.
• Ultra: 123 average FPS.

At 2560x1440, the results are:

• Low: 210 average FPS.
• Medium: 172 average FPS, with a minimum of 146 and a maximum of 198.
• High: 141 average FPS.
• Ultra: 88 average FPS.

At 3840x2160, the results are:

• Low: 131 average FPS.
• Medium: 107 average FPS, with a minimum of 91 and a maximum of 123.
• High: 88 average FPS.
• Ultra: 55 average FPS.

The Ultra preset presents the most demanding scenario. At 4K, the average FPS of 55 is below the 60 FPS threshold many consider the baseline for smooth gameplay. Even at 1440p, Ultra only achieves 88 FPS. In contrast, the High preset offers a much better balance, with 198 FPS at 1080p and 141 FPS at 1440p. The Medium preset provides an even higher frame rate cushion, with a minimum FPS of 205 at 1080p, ensuring consistent performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global database of tested combinations for Downfall, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 1122 out of 3716 total combos. This places it in the 70th percentile, indicating that it performs better than the majority of tested systems.

The rank reflects the balance between the two components. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 25517, sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, scores 25530, which is only 0.1% higher. The GPU, with an average score of 23877, is in the 69th percentile of all GPUs.

Neither component is a weak link. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide ample processing power. The GPU’s performance, while not top-tier, is more than adequate for this title. The combination’s rank of 1122 suggests that it outperforms many systems with higher-end components in one area but lower-end in another. The data indicates that this is a well-matched pairing for Downfall, avoiding severe bottlenecks that would hurt the overall ranking.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This capacity is substantial for a 2016 game, which typically uses fewer threads.

In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 20655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2916 in single-core. Its Geekbench multi-core score is 9959, and the single-core score is 1907. The Passmark multithread score is 24303. These results place the CPU in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong performance.

For Downfall, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 295 FPS. This high frame rate is only possible if the CPU can process the game’s simulation and render commands quickly enough. The Ryzen 7 5700’s 16 threads and high boost clock ensure that it can handle the workload.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, has an average score of 25485, which is 0.1% lower. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700 is on par with newer mobile processors. The data confirms that the CPU is a capable partner for the RX 9070, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice if visual fidelity is the priority, as it still delivers an average of 123 FPS. However, the High preset at 198 FPS provides a significantly smoother experience with only a modest visual downgrade. The Low preset at 295 FPS is useful for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, but the Medium preset offers a balanced experience with a minimum FPS of 205.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It achieves an average of 141 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 88 FPS is still playable, but the drop from 141 to 88 is noticeable. The Medium preset at 172 FPS offers extra headroom, especially for monitors with a 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring that frame times remain consistent.

For 3840x2160, the High preset is the only viable option for a smooth experience, with an average of 88 FPS. The Medium preset at 107 FPS is also acceptable, but the High preset provides a better visual quality without sacrificing too much performance. The Ultra preset at 55 FPS is below the ideal threshold and may result in stutter or input lag. The Low preset at 131 FPS is an option for maximum frame rate, but it negates the benefits of 4K resolution.

In summary, the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. The data shows that the Ultra preset demands a significant performance cost, making it suitable only for users with 1080p or 1440p displays who prioritize graphics over frame rate.