Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 110 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 63 | 76 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 101 | 123 | 150 |
| 1080p Full HD | 88 | 141 | 172 | 210 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 9060. The measured frame rates for Downfall show a horror game where the balance between the six-core Zen 4 processor and the RDNA 4.0 graphics card changes dramatically depending on resolution and quality preset. The benchmark data indicates a system that can deliver high refresh rates at 1080p but falls back to console-level smoothness at 4K, with the Ultra preset acting as a stress test for both components.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread performance in synthetic tests. The processor scores 1965 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2603 in Geekbench single-core, placing it in the 79th percentile against all CPUs. For a 2016 horror title, this level of single-thread throughput is more than sufficient to handle game logic and AI routines.
In multi-threaded workloads, the 7600X produces a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 and a Geekbench multicore score of 13858. Its average benchmark score of 27636 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (27578, deltaPct 0.2) and Intel Core i5-12600K (27578, deltaPct 0.2). The data shows the 7600X sits slightly above these rivals but trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE by -0.3 deltaPct. The processor's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support contribute to its ability to feed the GPU without bottlenecking at lower resolutions.
Looking at the measured FPS data, the CPU's role becomes clearer when comparing 1080p Low versus 4K Low. At 1080p Low, the system produces 210 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 93 FPS. The difference between these two points (117 FPS) indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. However, the 6-core configuration with 12 threads ensures that even at 1080p Ultra (88 FPS), the processor is not the primary constraint. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6879 and max-thread score of 6845 show consistent scaling across thread counts, meaning the CPU does not exhibit unexpected performance cliffs that would hurt frame pacing in Downfall.
The processor's 105 W TDP and 5 nm process node from TSMC are relevant for sustained performance. The 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die allow for efficient power delivery during extended gaming sessions. The 7600X's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, scores 27535 with a deltaPct of 0.4, meaning the 7600X is 0.4% faster in average benchmark score. This margin is negligible in real-world gaming, and the measured FPS data confirms the CPU is not a weak link in this combo.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, codenamed Strix Point. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The core clocks are 1700 MHz base, 2400 MHz game, and 2990 MHz boost, which explains its strong raw throughput. The GPU achieves 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s, placing it in the 59th percentile against all GPUs.
In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 9060 scores 17631 in Passmark G3D and 3322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its average benchmark score of 16014 is remarkably close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16129 with a deltaPct of -0.7. This means the RX 9060 is 0.7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti in average benchmark score. The GPU is also 1% faster than both the AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700, and 2.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W5500.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor for Downfall. At 4K Ultra, the system produces only 39 FPS, while at 4K High it reaches 63 FPS. This 24 FPS drop from High to Ultra at 4K suggests the Ultra preset is pushing the memory bandwidth and capacity to their limits. The 128-bit bus width and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data shows a significant penalty at 4K Ultra. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 28 ray tracing cores provide enough fill rate for the horror game's dark environments, but the limited VRAM becomes the bottleneck at the highest settings.
The RX 9060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, which covers Downfall's API requirements. The 4 nm process node from TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die gives it a high transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU's 132 W TDP and suggested 300 W PSU are modest, but the measured FPS indicates the card is well-matched to the 7600X for this title.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. At Low settings, the system produces 210 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p, and 93 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 55.7% drop from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases.
At Medium settings, the FPS values are 172 at 1080p, 123 at 1440p, and 76 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28.5%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 38.2%. This steeper decline at higher resolutions confirms that the RX 9060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are being stressed more heavily as resolution increases.
High settings show 141 FPS at 1080p, 101 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 28.4% from 1080p to 1440p and 37.6% from 1440p to 4K. This pattern is consistent with Medium settings, showing that the GPU's compute capabilities scale predictably with resolution.
Ultra settings are where the system struggles most. The FPS drops from 88 at 1080p to 63 at 1440p (a 28.4% decrease) and then to 39 at 4K (a 38.1% decrease from 1440p). The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold that most consider playable, indicating that the Ultra preset at 4K is too demanding for this combo.
The resolution scaling data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are well-balanced, with the 6-core processor able to feed the GPU enough frames. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more dominant, but the system still maintains playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component, with the RX 9060's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth being insufficient for the higher pixel count and texture detail.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance. At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 172 FPS average with a minimum of 146 FPS and maximum of 198 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides smooth gameplay for a horror title where frame pacing matters for atmosphere.
At 1440p, the High preset produces 101 FPS average, which is suitable for most gaming monitors. The Medium preset at 1440p delivers 123 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS, making it a better choice for players with high refresh rate displays. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 63 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced sections.
At 4K, the Low preset achieves 93 FPS, which is the only preset that maintains a high frame rate. The Medium preset at 4K produces 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS, which is acceptable for casual play. The High preset at 4K drops to 63 FPS, right at the edge of playability, while the Ultra preset at 4K falls to 39 FPS, which is not recommended for a smooth experience.
The best overall experience per the measured rows is the Medium preset at 1440p. It provides 123 FPS average with a minimum of 104 FPS, which is smooth and visually detailed. The Medium preset at 1080p is also excellent with 172 FPS average, but the visual upgrade to 1440p justifies the lower frame rate. For players prioritizing frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p with 210 FPS is the optimal choice.
The data indicates that the Ultra preset should be avoided at all resolutions. At 1080p, it delivers 88 FPS, which is only 51% of the Low preset's performance. At 1440p, it drops to 63 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 39 FPS. The visual difference between High and Ultra does not justify the performance cost, making High the better choice for quality-focused players.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 1667 out of 2928 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the 43rd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning 43% of combos perform worse and 57% perform better. The rank is measured across the full range of resolutions and settings tested in the database.
This ranking reflects the GPU's position in the market. The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 puts it slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is a popular mid-range card. The combo's rank of 1667 suggests that there are many faster combinations, but the 7600X's strong single-thread performance helps boost the overall result.
The combo's rank is consistent with its hardware specifications. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with 32 MB L3 cache is sufficient for gaming, while the 8 GB VRAM GPU is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but limited at 4K. The rank of 1667 out of 2928 indicates that this is a mid-tier setup that can handle most games at reasonable settings but will not compete with high-end configurations.
The nearest GPU rival, the RTX 3060 Ti, would likely place this combo slightly higher in the rankings given its 0.7% higher average benchmark score. However, the difference is minimal and would not substantially change the gaming experience. The combo's rank is more affected by the GPU's 59th percentile position than the CPU's 79th percentile, confirming that the graphics card is the limiting factor for this pairing.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
1920x1080:
- Low: 210 FPS average
- Medium: 172 FPS average, 146 FPS minimum, 198 FPS maximum
- High: 141 FPS average
- Ultra: 88 FPS average
2560x1440:
- Low: 150 FPS average
- Medium: 123 FPS average, 104 FPS minimum, 141 FPS maximum
- High: 101 FPS average
- Ultra: 63 FPS average
3840x2160:
- Low: 93 FPS average
- Medium: 76 FPS average, 65 FPS minimum, 88 FPS maximum
- High: 63 FPS average
- Ultra: 39 FPS average
The data shows that at 1080p, all presets except Ultra maintain frame rates above 140 FPS, making the system suitable for high refresh rate monitors. At 1440p, the Low and Medium presets remain above 120 FPS, while High and Ultra drop to 101 and 63 FPS respectively. At 4K, only the Low preset stays above 90 FPS, with Medium and High hovering near 76 and 63 FPS, and Ultra falling to 39 FPS.
The minimum FPS values for Medium settings show that the system maintains reasonable frame consistency. At 1080p, the minimum of 146 FPS is 85% of the average, while at 1440p, the minimum of 104 FPS is 85% of the average, and at 4K, the minimum of 65 FPS is 86% of the average. This consistency is important for a horror game where sudden drops in frame rate can break immersion.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS on High settings?
A: The system achieves 141 FPS at 1080p High, 101 FPS at 1440p High, and 63 FPS at 4K High. All three resolutions maintain frame rates above 60 FPS on High settings, but 4K is right at the edge with 63 FPS.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129. The RX 9060 is 0.7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti according to the deltaPct value of -0.7.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, the Low preset produces 150 FPS average, while the Ultra preset produces 63 FPS average. This represents a 87 FPS difference, with Ultra delivering only 42% of the Low preset's performance.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at 1080p?
A: At 1080p Low, the system produces 210 FPS, which is very high. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance suggest it is not the limiting factor. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking and the significant FPS drops at higher resolutions indicate the GPU is the primary constraint.
Q: What is the 4K Ultra experience like for this combo?
A: At 4K Ultra, the system produces 39 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus of the RX 9060 are insufficient for the highest quality settings at 4K.
*Q: How does this combo rank against all tested combinations in Downfall?*
A: This combo ranks 1667 out of 2928 tested combos, placing it in the 43rd percentile. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier performance and the CPU's above-average capabilities.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 150.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 123.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 101.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 210.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 172.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 141.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.