Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 42 | 47 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 62 | 70 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 82 | 92 | 130 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
Control is a demanding action-adventure title, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 reveals a configuration that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates across the three resolutions and four quality presets paint a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies, and the overall combo ranking of 1632 out of 2888 tested configurations indicates a mid-pack performance tier for this specific title.
Resolution Scaling
The most striking trend in the data is the dramatic impact of resolution on frame rate. Moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 at the High preset shows a significant performance drop, with average FPS falling from 82 to 42. This 40 FPS decrease represents a near-halving of performance, which strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K. Similarly, at the Low preset, the transition from 1080p to 4K sees the average frame rate drop from 130 to 66 FPS, a reduction of 64 FPS. These figures indicate that the Radeon RX 9060 is being pushed to its limits as the pixel count increases, while the Ryzen 5 7600X has ample headroom to feed it frames.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all quality settings, which further reinforces the GPU-bound nature of this pairing at higher resolutions. At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 62 FPS, which is a 20 FPS reduction from the 1080p result. The jump from 1440p to 4K then incurs another 20 FPS penalty, showing a fairly linear degradation in performance as resolution scales. This is characteristic of a system where the graphics card’s memory bandwidth and compute throughput are the defining constraints, rather than the CPU’s processing power. The data implies that users targeting 4K gaming with this combo will need to make significant compromises in visual quality to achieve playable frame rates.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable with this CPU and GPU combo in Control?
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 130 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This is the only configuration in the data that breaks the 120 FPS threshold, indicating that high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming is possible, but only with reduced graphical fidelity.
Q: How does the combo perform at 2560x1440 resolution?
A: At 1440p, the measured average frame rates range from 98 FPS on Low settings down to 54 FPS on Ultra settings. The High preset yields 62 FPS, and Medium delivers 70 FPS, which shows that a smooth experience is attainable, but the Ultra preset will fall below the 60 FPS target for many users.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon RX 9060 in this game?
A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The frame rate drops consistently with increased resolution and graphical settings, which is the classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread benchmark scores, such as a 3dmark single-thread score of 1060 and a cinebench_r23 multicore score of 15236, suggest it has sufficient processing power to keep up with the GPU’s output at the tested settings.
Q: What is the combo’s overall performance rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo is ranked 1632 out of 2888 total tested combinations for Control. This places it in the middle of the pack, meaning that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is also far from the bottom, offering a balanced experience that is typical for this class of hardware.
Q: What is the difference in performance between the Medium and Ultra presets at 1920x1080?
A: At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers an average of 92 FPS, while the Ultra preset reduces that to 71 FPS. This 21 FPS difference represents a 22.8% performance loss when switching from Medium to Ultra, which is a significant trade-off for the increased visual quality.
Q: Does the GPU’s 8 GB of memory appear to cause any issues in the benchmark data?
A: The data does not show any anomalies that would directly point to VRAM limitations, such as sudden or erratic frame rate drops. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and the 128-bit bus width are adequate for the measured settings, as the performance scales predictably with resolution and quality, without any signs of texture thrashing or memory-related stutters.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 achieves a rank of 1632 out of 2888 tested configurations in Control. This places it in the 56.5th percentile of all combos, indicating that it outperforms more than half of the tested systems but is still outclassed by a substantial number of higher-end pairings. This mid-pack ranking is consistent with the GPU’s overall performance percentile of 59, which shows that the Radeon RX 9060 sits slightly above the median for all GPUs in the database.
Looking at the nearest rivals for the GPU, the data shows that the RX 9060’s average benchmark score of 16014 is very close to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has a score of 16129, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.7. This means the RX 9060 is within 1% of the RTX 3060 Ti’s raw performance, suggesting that the combo’s rank is largely driven by the GPU’s capability. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, have nearly identical average scores with deltaPct values of 0.2, which means the choice of CPU in this performance class has a negligible impact on the overall rank. The data implies that users looking to improve this combo’s standing in Control would benefit most from a GPU upgrade, as the CPU is already performing on par with its direct competitors.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of settings. The Low preset produces an average of 130 FPS, which is the highest of any configuration tested. The Medium preset follows with an average of 92 FPS, and the data includes a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS, indicating some variance in frame times. The High preset delivers 82 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 71 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the combo is capable of high refresh rates on lower settings, but even the Ultra preset maintains a playable frame rate above 60 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down accordingly. The Low preset achieves an average of 98 FPS, which is still quite smooth. The Medium preset delivers 70 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, placing it right at the edge of the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset yields 62 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 54 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS target for many gamers. At this resolution, users will need to choose between High settings for a near-60 FPS experience or Medium for a more comfortable margin.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The Low preset is the only option that provides a somewhat smooth experience, with an average of 66 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 47 FPS, with a minimum of 40 FPS and a maximum of 54 FPS, which could lead to noticeable stuttering in action-heavy scenes. The High preset averages 42 FPS, and the Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing an average of only 36 FPS. These results indicate that 4K gaming is only viable on the Low preset, and even then, the frame rate is not consistently high.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060, based on the Navi 44 chip and RDNA 4.0 architecture, plays a dominant role in determining the frame rates for this combo in Control. The data shows that the GPU’s performance ceiling is the primary factor limiting the system, especially as resolution and graphical settings increase. The GPU’s boost clock of 2990 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz are relatively high, but the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, appears to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
The benchmark scores for the GPU support this interpretation. The passmark_g3d score of 17631 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, which is a solid mid-range result. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, has a comparable average score, confirming that the RX 9060 is positioned in the upper mid-range tier. The 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 3322 is a modern benchmark that reflects its DirectX 12 performance, which is directly relevant to Control. The data suggests that this GPU is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its 8 GB VRAM and memory bandwidth become a constraint at 4K, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drops observed in the measured FPS breakdown.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 82 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, though users with high refresh rate monitors may prefer the Medium preset at 92 FPS for a smoother experience. The Ultra preset at 71 FPS is also viable, providing the best visuals while staying above the 60 FPS threshold.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 70 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target and includes a minimum of 59 FPS, which is acceptable. The High preset at 62 FPS is also playable, but the lower minimum frame rates could be noticeable in intense combat scenarios. The Ultra preset at 54 FPS is not recommended for a consistent experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS mark.
At 3840x2160, the options are limited. The Low preset at 66 FPS is the only configuration that achieves a smooth frame rate, but it requires a significant sacrifice in visual quality. The Medium preset at 47 FPS is the next best option, but it may result in stuttering. For 4K gaming, users should accept the Low preset or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p with higher settings. The data clearly indicates that this combo is not designed for high-fidelity 4K gaming in Control.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, provides a strong foundation for this gaming combo. The CPU’s high clock speeds, with a base of 4.70 GHz and a boost of 5.30 GHz, are well-suited for gaming workloads that often rely on single-thread performance. Its benchmark scores, including a 3dmark single-thread score of 1060 and a passmark single-thread score of 4135, place it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, showing that it is a capable processor for this task.
However, the measured FPS data in Control indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. The performance degradation patterns, which scale linearly with resolution and settings, are characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with deltaPct values of 0.2, which means that swapping the 7600X for one of these alternatives would have a negligible impact on gaming performance in this title.
The CPU’s capabilities, such as its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, ensure that it can quickly feed data to the GPU. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 6879 and the cinebench_r23 multicore score of 15236 indicate that the CPU has ample multi-threaded performance for any background tasks or game logic that may be running. In this case, the data suggests that the Ryzen 5 7600X is more than sufficient for Control, and the overall performance of the combo is dictated by the Radeon RX 9060’s ability to render frames.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 62.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 92.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 82.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
Control with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.