Doom

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a highly capable Doom experience, ranking in the 51st percentile of all tested combinations (1889th out of 3712). The data shows that this combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, where it easily maintains high refresh rates, while 4K requires setting adjustments to stay smooth. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and the i5-14400F’s 10-core design create a balanced platform, though the 4K Ultra preset falls short of playable averages.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Doom?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are the sweet spots. At 1080p, every preset from Low to Ultra averages above 135 FPS, and at 1440p, even the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS. 3840x2160 is playable but requires Medium settings (66 FPS) or lower.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2% and leads the Intel Core i7-12800H by 0.5%.

Q: Is the RTX 5060’s 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Doom?

A: Yes, based on the measured FPS data, the 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient. The game runs at playable frame rates across all tested presets, with the only sub-60 FPS result occurring at 4K Ultra (45 FPS), which is more a factor of raw compute than VRAM capacity.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking?

A: This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 1889th out of 3712 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the upper half of all configurations, indicating solid mid-range performance.

Q: Which settings provide the largest performance jump?

A: Dropping from High to Low settings yields the biggest gains. At 4K, the average FPS jumps from 47 to 94 (a 100% increase). At 1440p, it goes from 90 to 179, and at 1080p from 142 to 284.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at 1080p?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary scaling factor. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads with a 4.70 GHz boost clock are strong, but the FPS scales directly with resolution and settings changes, suggesting the RTX 5060 is the bottleneck at higher presets.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the dominant performance driver in this configuration. Its 8 GB of GDDR7 memory operates at 1750 MHz with a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is directly reflected in the game’s scaling; at 1080p, the card produces 284 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 135 FPS on Ultra, showing a 149 FPS swing purely from graphics load.

The GPU’s architectural strengths are evident in the benchmark scores. The RTX 5060 achieves a Passmark G3D score of 20891 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401 on average, which is 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, 1.2% lower. Despite these close synthetic averages, the real-world Doom results show the RTX 5060 handling the game’s Vulkan-based engine efficiently.

The card’s boost clock of 2497 MHz and 3840 shading units provide the raw throughput needed for high framerates. At 1440p Medium, the combo hits 127 FPS average with a minimum of 108 FPS, indicating stable frame pacing. The 4K results are more revealing of the GPU’s limits: High settings yield 47 FPS, while Ultra drops to 45 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is maxed out, and the 8 GB VRAM, while adequate, does not prevent the performance cliff between Medium (66 FPS) and High (47 FPS).

The RTX 5060’s 145 W TDP and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface are well-matched to the i5-14400F’s capabilities. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure full compatibility with Doom’s modern rendering paths. For this game, the GPU is the primary determinant of the experience, with the CPU providing sufficient support to avoid bottlenecking at all but the lowest settings and resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F provides a robust foundation for the RTX 5060 in Doom. With 10 cores (6 performance and 4 efficiency) and 16 threads, the CPU handles the game’s physics and AI calculations without becoming a limiting factor. Its base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz ensure strong single-thread performance, which is critical for frame generation in a fast-paced FPS.

The CPU’s benchmark results confirm its strength. It scores 3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 21645 in multi-core, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2058. The Passmark single-thread score of 3701 places it well above average, and its overall percentile vs. all CPUs is 83. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, has an average score of 32233, a negligible 0.1% difference, showing the i5-14400F is competitively positioned.

In Doom’s measured results, the CPU’s role becomes apparent when examining the 1080p Low preset, where the combo achieves 284 FPS. This high framerate requires the CPU to feed the GPU with draw calls efficiently. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide low-latency access to game assets, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent frame times.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and LGA 1700 socket make it a power-efficient choice that pairs well with the GPU’s 145 W TDP. While the CPU does not directly dictate the FPS caps seen at higher settings, its 16 threads ensure that background tasks and game logic do not cause stutters. The data shows no scenario where the CPU is the bottleneck; even at 4K Low (94 FPS), the system is clearly GPU-limited, as the CPU has ample headroom for more demanding tasks.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1889th out of 3712 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the 51st percentile, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of all configurations tested. This ranking reflects a balanced mid-range setup that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions.

The rank is influenced by the CPU’s 83rd percentile standing among all CPUs and the GPU’s 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The CPU’s relative strength is higher than the GPU’s, suggesting that the RTX 5060 is the component holding back the overall combo rank. For context, the CPU’s nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, Intel Core i9-11900) have nearly identical average scores, while the GPU’s rivals (AMD Radeon 860M, NVIDIA GeForce MX550) also score similarly, indicating tight competition at this tier.

The combo’s rank is further contextualized by its performance in the game itself. At 1440p, the system delivers 90 FPS on High and 127 FPS on Medium, which are excellent results for this resolution. At 1080p, it exceeds 200 FPS on Medium and 135 FPS on Ultra. These figures are well above the 60 FPS baseline for smooth gameplay, validating the rank as a strong performer for its class.

However, the 4K results drag the overall ranking down. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 45 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold considered playable. This indicates that while the combo is ranked in the upper half, it is not intended for 4K gaming at maximum settings. The rank of 1889 out of 3712 accurately reflects this: it is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine, but not a 4K powerhouse.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 135 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the highest visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 142 FPS is also viable, but Ultra’s 135 FPS is close enough to justify the visual upgrade.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is recommended. It produces an average of 90 FPS, which is comfortable for most gaming monitors. The Ultra preset drops to 85 FPS, which is still playable, but the 5 FPS difference between Ultra and High suggests that High offers a better balance of performance and quality. The Medium preset at 127 FPS is overkill for 1440p and would unnecessarily reduce visual quality.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the only viable option for smooth gameplay. It achieves an average of 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target. The High preset drops to 47 FPS, and Ultra falls to 45 FPS, both of which are below playable thresholds. The Low preset at 94 FPS is technically playable but significantly reduces visual quality.

The data clearly shows that Medium settings at 4K are the sweet spot for this combo, providing a playable experience without the massive visual downgrade of Low. For users prioritizing framerate over fidelity, the 1440p High preset offers the best overall experience, combining 90 FPS average performance with high-quality visuals.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its peak performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 284 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all resolutions. Medium settings yield 201 FPS with a minimum of 171 FPS and a maximum of 232 FPS. High settings produce 142 FPS, and Ultra settles at 135 FPS. This resolution shows a clear scaling pattern, with each step down in quality providing a significant FPS boost.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected resolution penalty. Low settings deliver 179 FPS, Medium achieves 127 FPS with a minimum of 108 FPS and a maximum of 146 FPS, High produces 90 FPS, and Ultra drops to 85 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra narrows at this resolution, with only a 5 FPS difference, suggesting diminishing returns on the highest preset.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings average 94 FPS, Medium averages 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS, High averages 47 FPS, and Ultra averages 45 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium is substantial (94 to 66 FPS), but the drop from Medium to High is even more pronounced (66 to 47 FPS), indicating a major graphics load increase at the High preset.

The measured data includes min and max FPS only for the Medium preset across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the range is 171-232 FPS, at 1440p it is 108-146 FPS, and at 4K it is 56-76 FPS. These ranges show consistent frame delivery with no severe dips, confirming that the Medium preset provides the most stable experience across all resolutions. The absence of min/max data for other presets means the averages should be interpreted with the understanding that frame pacing may vary, but the Medium preset’s measured stability makes it the recommended choice for users who prioritize consistent performance.