Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, placing this pairing at rank 1629 out of 3719 tested combos. This places the combo in the 56th percentile of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a competitive FPS where high refresh rates matter more than absolute visual fidelity. The data shows a system that is heavily CPU-bound at lower resolutions, with the GPU becoming more relevant as resolution increases.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, running on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. This processor has a 20 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, which are critical for gaming performance. The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, alongside a Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 and a single-core score of 2058. These scores indicate that the i5-14400F has excellent per-core performance, which is the primary driver for frame rates in CS:GO, a game known for its reliance on single-threaded CPU speed.

The CPU’s percentile ranking against all CPUs is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i9-11900 (deltaPct 0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (deltaPct -0.2), and Intel Core i7-12800H (deltaPct 0.5). The negligible deltas (all within 0.5%) show the i5-14400F sits in a tightly contested performance tier. In CS:GO, this CPU strength translates directly to high frame rates, particularly at 1080p where the graphics card is less stressed.

The measured FPS data supports this conclusion. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 690 FPS. This number drops to 508 FPS at High settings and 434 FPS at Ultra settings. The fact that lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p yields a 256 FPS increase (from 434 to 690) shows that the CPU is capable of pushing far more frames than the GPU can render at higher quality settings. The 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock allow the processor to maintain high single-thread performance, which is essential for CS:GO’s game logic and physics calculations. The data suggests that at 1080p, the i5-14400F is the limiting factor, as the frame rates scale significantly with settings changes that affect GPU load.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB206 chip and features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and it has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU’s compute performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS for FP32, and it has a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s. The RTX 5060 scores 20891 in Passmark G3D and 3628 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in average score include the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.8), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (deltaPct 1.2). These rivals are all within 1.2% of the RTX 5060’s average score, indicating a very competitive mid-range tier. In CS:GO, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 207 on High settings and 176 on Ultra, compared to 508 and 434 at 1080p. This scaling shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are sufficient for CS:GO’s modest texture requirements but the raw pixel throughput becomes limiting.

The 8 GB of GDDR7 memory is not a constraint in CS:GO, as the game’s textures and assets are lightweight by modern standards. The GPU’s boost clock of 2497 MHz ensures consistent performance, but the data shows that at 1080p, the RTX 5060 is underutilized — the FPS difference between Low (690) and Ultra (434) settings at 1080p is 256 FPS, which is entirely GPU-driven. At 1440p, the spread narrows to 176 FPS (475 Low vs 299 Ultra), and at 4K it shrinks to 104 FPS (280 Low vs 176 Ultra). This progression confirms that the GPU’s workload increases with resolution, but even at 4K, the RTX 5060 maintains an average of 176 FPS on Ultra settings, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in CS:GO?

A: Based on measured FPS, 1920x1080 with Low settings yields the highest average at 690 FPS. At 2560x1440 High settings, the average is 350 FPS, and at 3840x2160 High settings, it drops to 207 FPS. For competitive play, 1080p offers the highest frame rates, but 1440p still provides over 299 FPS on Ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is within 0.5% of its closest rivals. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840Ucars and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, while being 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H.

Q: Is the RTX 5060 the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No, the data shows the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The FPS drops from 690 on Low to 434 on Ultra, a 256 FPS decrease that scales with GPU load. Since the CPU can push over 690 FPS, the GPU is not the constraint at this resolution.

Q: Does the RTX 5060’s 8 GB VRAM cause issues in CS:GO?

A: No, the measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 176, and at 4K High it is 207. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory is sufficient for CS:GO’s requirements, as the game does not demand large VRAM allocations.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1629 out of 3719 tested combinations, placing it in the 56th percentile. This is a strong position for a game like CS:GO, where high frame rates are more important than absolute resolution.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to its rivals?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. It is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550, 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1629 out of 3719 tested combos in CS:GO. This places the system in the 56th percentile of all tested configurations. This is a noteworthy achievement because CS:GO is a highly CPU-sensitive game, and the i5-14400F’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055) compensates for the RTX 5060’s mid-range GPU positioning.

The rank becomes more impressive when considering the GPU’s own percentile of 72. The RTX 5060 is not a top-tier graphics card, yet the combo still outperforms 56% of all systems tested. This suggests the CPU is doing the heavy lifting in maintaining high frame rates. The nearest CPU rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i9-11900, have nearly identical average scores (within 0.2%), meaning systems with those CPUs and similar GPUs would produce comparable resultsikuha.

The combo’s rank of 1629 out of 3719 means there are 2090 tested systems that achieve lower performance, which is a substantial majority. However, the 56th percentile also indicates that 44% of systems are faster. Given that CS:GO is a game where professional players often target 240 FPS or higher, this combo comfortably exceeds that threshold at 1080p and 1440p, with the lowest average being 299 FPS at 1440p Ultra. The data shows that this pairing is well-optimized for high-refresh-rate competitive play, sacrificing some visual fidelity for raw frame rate.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of CPU and GPU load shifting as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all settings is high, with Low delivering 690 FPS, Medium 587, High 508, and Ultra 434. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 256 FPS, a 59% increase from Ultra to Low. This large delta indicates that the GPU is not fully utilized at Low settings, as the CPU can push more frames than the GPU can render. The CPU is the primary bottleneck at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS values drop to 475 on Low, 404 on Medium, 350 on High, and 299 on Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 176 FPS, a 59% difference. The reduction in absolute FPS and the narrower spread show that the GPU is becoming more involved. The RTX 5060’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 19.18 TFLOPS compute are now being exercised more fully. The CPU is still capable of higher frame rates, but the GPU is starting to limit performance.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS falls to 280 on Low, 239 on Medium, 207 on High, and 176 on Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra is only 104 FPS, a 59% difference again. This pattern — consistent percentage differences across resolutions — is notable. The frame rates at 4K are still high, indicating that the RTX 5060 is not severely bottlenecked, but the GPU is clearly the limiting component at this resolution. The data shows that as resolution increases, the FPS drops by roughly 48% from 1080p Low (690) to 1440p Low (475), and then by another 41% from 1440p Low to 4K Low (280). This scaling is typical for a balanced system, where neither component is severely underpowered.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in CS:GO is comprehensive, covering four settings levels at three resolutions)Skip.

At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its highest frame rates. On Low settings, the average FPS is 690. Medium settings yield an average of 587 FPS, with a minimum of 499 and a maximum of 675. High settings produce an average of 508 FPS. Ultra settings drop the average to 434 FPS. The 1080p results show that even at Ultra settings, the system maintains over 400 FPS, which is far above any competitive threshold.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. Low settings average 475 FPS. Medium settings average 404 FPS, with a minimum of 343 and a maximum of 465. High settings average 350 FPS. Ultra settings average 299 FPS. The 1440p results demonstrate that the system is still capable of delivering 300 FPS or more at the highest quality settings, making it suitable for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are lower but still robust. Low settings average 280 FPS. Medium settings average 239 FPS, with a minimum of 203 and a maximum of 274. High settings average 207 FPS. Ultra settings average 176 FPS. The 4K results show that the system can handle 4K gaming in CS:GO, though the frame rates dip below 200 FPS on Ultra. The minimum FPS of 203 at 4K Medium indicates that there are no severe frame drops, making the experience smooth even at higher resolutions.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 256 FPS at 1080p, 176 FPS at 1440p, and 104 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU’s impact on performance grows with resolution. The system is clearly CPU-bound at 1080p, where the i5-14400F’s high single-core performance (Cinebench R15 single-core score of 307, R20 single-core of 1283) drives frame rates beyond what the GPU can render. At 4K, the RTX 5060 becomes the limiting factor, but it still delivers 176 FPS on Ultra, which is a strong result for a mid-range GPU in a competitive FPS.