Doom

Doom’s performance on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with the integrated AMD Radeon 8060S shows a classic balance between a strong CPU and a capable integrated GPU. The measured data reveals that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, and it can still deliver playable frame rates at 1440p, but 4K requires careful settings management. The overall rank of 1671 out of 2930 tested combos places this configuration in the upper-middle tier, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it offers a robust experience for a mobile platform.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and highlights where the bottleneck lies. At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 127 at 1920x1080 to 82 at 2560x1440, and then down to 45 at 3840x2160. That is a 64.5% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K, which is a steep curve. The data indicates that the Radeon 8060S is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU has ample headroom to push more frames if the GPU could keep up.

Looking at the scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings, the average FPS drops from 101 to 55, a 45.5% decrease. This is a substantial hit that clearly shows the pixel-pushing demands of 4K are taxing the GPU heavily. In contrast, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings sees a drop from 155 to 101 FPS, a 34.8% reduction. This pattern suggests that while the GPU struggles with the raw pixel count of 4K, it still manages to provide a solid experience at lower resolutions.

The performance gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (211 FPS) and Ultra (127 FPS) is 84 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 55 FPS (137 vs. 82), and at 4K it shrinks to 29 FPS (74 vs. 45). This indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that reducing graphical fidelity provides diminishing returns, as the core limitation is the fill rate rather than the complexity of the scene.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8060S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, and its role in Doom is pivotal. It operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, which are respectable figures for an iGPU. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the same LPDDR5X memory pool as the CPU, with bandwidth that is "System Dependent." This shared memory architecture is a key factor in its performance, as it avoids the overhead of copying data over a separate bus but is also subject to system-level contention.

With 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, the 8060S has a solid foundation for rasterization. The data shows it achieves a texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s, which are decent numbers that translate into the measured frame rates. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 14.85 TFLOPS is a strong indicator of its raw compute capability, but in Doom, the actual frame rates are more dependent on memory bandwidth and fill rate. The GPU’s percentile rank of 87 vs all GPUs suggests it outperforms the majority of discrete and integrated solutions, which is corroborated by its 1080p performance.

The nearest rivals for the Radeon 8060S include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which it matches with a deltaPct of 0.1, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, which is 0.6% slower in this comparison. This is a peculiar grouping, as the RTX 5080 is a high-end discrete card, but the data shows the 8060S holds its own in this specific benchmark context. The comparison to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 shows the 8060S is 2.8% faster, further indicating that its performance is competitive with prior-generation high-end discrete GPUs in these synthetic tests. However, in real-world gaming, the shared memory and power constraints of an iGPU will often limit sustained performance.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, the Medium preset at 1440p is the standout choice. The measured data shows an average of 119 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This setting also provides a minimum FPS of 101, ensuring that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate does not dip into uncomfortable territory. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 18 FPS (119 to 101), which might not be worth the visual bump for competitive play.

At 1080p, the High preset is the sweet spot. It delivers an average of 155 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors, and the visual upgrade over Medium is noticeable. The Ultra preset at 1080p still achieves 127 FPS, but the incremental gains over High are minimal for the performance cost. For players who prioritize maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p yields 211 FPS, but this sacrifices too much visual fidelity for most users.

At 4K, the data suggests that High settings are not practical, with an average of only 55 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K offers 65 FPS, which is borderline playable, but the Low preset at 74 FPS is the recommended setting for a smoother experience. Since the minimum FPS is not recorded for Low at 4K, it is safer to opt for Medium if you want the documented minimum of 55 FPS, even if the average is slightly lower. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as it drops to 45 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most action games.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the results are consistently strong across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 211 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution. The Medium preset follows with 184 FPS, with a minimum of 156 and a maximum of 212, showing tight frame pacing. High settings yield 155 FPS, while Ultra drops to 127 FPS. All these values are above 120 FPS, making 1080p an ideal resolution for this combo.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains respectable but shows the GPU’s limitations. Low settings produce an average of 137 FPS, which is still excellent for 1440p gaming. Medium settings deliver 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 and a maximum of 137, ensuring a consistent experience. High settings drop to 101 FPS, which is right at the edge of high-refresh-rate territory. Ultra settings fall to 82 FPS, which is playable but requires a VRR display to avoid tearing.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. Low settings manage an average of 74 FPS, which is the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. Medium settings drop to 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74, making it a borderline choice. High settings are at 55 FPS, which is just at the edge of playability. Ultra settings are the worst at 45 FPS, which is not recommended for a fast-paced FPS like Doom. The data clearly shows that 4K is only viable with reduced settings, and even then, the frame rate is not ideal for competitive play.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with the AMD Radeon 8060S ranks 1671 out of 2930 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the 57th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of the systems tested but is still far from the top. This ranking is influenced by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for Doom’s engine, and the GPU’s ability to keep up at lower resolutions.

The CPU itself ranks in the 95th percentile vs all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which it is 1.6% faster than, and the Intel Core i9-14900K, which is 1.7% slower than the 395. This indicates that the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the combo’s overall rank is dragged down by the integrated GPU. The GPU ranks in the 87th percentile vs all GPUs, with an average score of 55757, which is strong for an iGPU but not competitive with the best discrete options.

The deltaPct values for the GPU’s rivals show a tight grouping: it is 0.1% faster than the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% faster than the RTX 5080, and 2.8% faster than the RTX 4080. This suggests that in the synthetic benchmarks, the 8060S punches above its weight, but the combo rank in Doom reflects the real-world gaming performance, which is more modest. The combination of a 95th percentile CPU and an 87th percentile GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it cannot compete with dedicated high-end GPUs at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Doom with this combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the best resolution, with all presets delivering above 120 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset provides 119 FPS, which is also excellent. 4K is only viable at Low settings, which yields 74 FPS.

Q: How does the Radeon 8060S compare to a discrete GPU like the RTX 4080?

A: In the provided benchmarks, the Radeon 8060S is 2.8% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. However, this is based on average benchmark scores, and real-world gaming performance may vary due to thermal and power constraints of an integrated GPU.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly from 1440p to 4K (e.g., High settings from 101 to 55 FPS), while the CPU has sufficient headroom, given its high percentile rank of 95.

Q: What settings should I use for a competitive edge at 1440p?

A: For competitive play, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is recommended, as it delivers 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS. This provides a smooth experience without the graphical overhead of High or Ultra settings.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K at all?

A: Yes, but only at reduced settings. The Low preset at 3840x2160 achieves 74 FPS, while Medium drops to 65 FPS. Ultra settings are not recommended, as they fall to 45 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1671 out of 2930 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier. This is a solid result for a mobile platform with an integrated GPU, but it does not compete with top-tier discrete GPU systems.