Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Doom, with performance scaling that clearly identifies the GPU as the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The dataset provides a complete matrix of average frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets, offering a clear view of how this combination handles the 2016 FPS title.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces 155 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 drops that to 101 FPS, a reduction of 54 FPS or roughly 35%. The jump to 3840x2160 cuts performance further to 54 FPS, which is 101 FPS below the 1080p result and 47 FPS below the 1440p figure. This pattern—where each resolution step extracts a large toll—indicates the rendering pipeline is saturated by the graphics card's throughput capabilities.

The scaling is consistent across all settings presets. With Low settings, the combo achieves 211 FPS at 1080p, 137 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are similar to the High preset, showing that the resolution penalty is independent of the quality level. This uniformity suggests the limiting factor is the GPU's raw fill rate and memory bandwidth rather than any specific setting's computational load.

At Ultra settings, the pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. The combo produces 127 FPS at 1080p, 82 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 45 FPS is the lowest in the entire dataset, and it is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold commonly considered smooth for an FPS title. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming pushes this combo to its limits, with even the Medium preset at 4K yielding only 65 FPS.

The scaling behavior indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this game. The Ryzen 7 5800XT's eight cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom, as evidenced by the fact that performance scales almost linearly with resolution. If the CPU were the constraint, the frame rate would remain relatively flat as resolution increased, but the data shows a steep decline, confirming the GPU is the limiting component.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the decisive factor in this combo's Doom performance. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes strained at 4K. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and the GPU's boost clock reaches 2990 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz. These clocks contribute to a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s, which are the specifications that govern how quickly the GPU can fill the screen with rendered geometry.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16129 (a 0.7% difference in favor of the NVIDIA card), and the AMD Radeon RX 7700, which scores 15852 (a 1% difference in favor of the RX 9060). These comparisons show that the RX 9060 sits in a competitive mid-range tier, and the Doom results reflect that positioning. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 17631 and DirectX 12 score of 44 further contextualize its capabilities, though the game-specific measured FPS provides the most relevant data.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for Doom's settings at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU can maintain high frame rates without memory pressure. At 4K, the combination of higher resolution textures and increased pixel count likely approaches the VRAM limit, contributing to the lower average FPS. The data shows the GPU's performance drops by roughly half when moving from 1440p to 4K at each settings level, which is consistent with a card that is working near its maximum throughput at the higher resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Doom?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 211 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K in Doom?

A: Yes, but only with Medium settings, which yields 65 FPS. High settings at 4K produce 54 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 45 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is the combo at 1080p compared to 4K with the same settings?

A: With High settings, the combo produces 155 FPS at 1080p versus 54 FPS at 4K, which is a 101 FPS difference. With Low settings, the difference is 137 FPS (211 vs 74).

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the dataset?

A: The minimum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 156 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 101 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 55 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129, and 1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7700's score of 15852.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. The frame rate drops significantly from 1440p to 4K across all settings, indicating that the graphics card's throughput limits performance, not the CPU.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1686 out of 2930 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the upper-middle portion of the database, roughly in the 42nd percentile of all combinations. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU is not holding back the GPU, but the GPU's mid-range positioning prevents the combo from reaching the top tiers.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 81 against all CPUs indicates it is a strong processor, with an average benchmark score of 29879. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with a score of 29868 (0% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with a score of 29713 (0.6% difference). This places the 5800XT in a competitive position among modern processors, ensuring it does not become a limiting factor in gaming workloads.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 59 against all GPUs is lower, confirming that the RX 9060 is the weaker component in this pairing. The combo's overall rank of 1686 suggests that while this setup is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, it does not offer the headroom required for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming. The ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows excellent performance at lower resolutions but a significant falloff at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT plays a supporting role in Doom's performance, providing the computational foundation for the GPU to operate without interruption. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It is built on the Zen 3 architecture using a 7 nm process node from TSMC, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The CPU's memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, offering 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5800XT demonstrates strong multi-threaded capabilities. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 23794, while the single-core score is 3359. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 7683, and the max-thread score is 7680, showing consistent scaling across thread counts. The passmark multithread score of 28053 and single-thread score of 3535 further illustrate a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

For Doom, which is a game that scales well with single-thread performance, the 5800XT's single-core scores are more relevant than its multi-core scores. The 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1410 indicate the CPU can handle the game's main thread without becoming a bottleneck. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the frame rates at 1080p are high enough to suggest the CPU is not limiting the GPU's output.

The CPU's 105 W TDP and AMD Socket AM4 compatibility make it a straightforward upgrade path for existing systems. The launch MSRP was $249, and it remains an active production part. The CPU's benchmark data shows it is competitive with modern mobile and desktop processors, with its nearest rivals all scoring within 0.6% of its average benchmark score.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides exact average frame rates for every combination of resolution and settings, with minimum and maximum values recorded only for Medium settings.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 211 FPS. Medium settings yield 184 FPS, with a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. High settings drop to 155 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 127 FPS. This resolution shows a steady decline from Low to Ultra, with a 84 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality presets.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows a clear step down. Low settings average 137 FPS. Medium settings average 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS. High settings produce 101 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 82 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 55 FPS, smaller than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is starting to feel the pressure of additional pixels.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 74 FPS. Medium settings average 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS. High settings produce 54 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 45 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 29 FPS, the smallest spread in the dataset, suggesting that the GPU's performance ceiling is being reached regardless of quality settings.

The Medium settings data provides insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the minimum of 156 FPS is close to the average of 184 FPS, indicating smooth performance. At 1440p, the minimum of 101 FPS matches the High preset average, showing acceptable consistency. At 4K, the minimum of 55 FPS is only 10 FPS below the average, suggesting the GPU maintains relatively stable performance even when stressed.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting 1080p, the Ultra preset at 127 FPS is the best choice for visual fidelity, as it remains well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the highest quality experience. The High preset at 155 FPS offers a good balance for those prioritizing frame rate, but Ultra is still smooth enough for competitive play. The Medium preset at 184 FPS and Low at 211 FPS are unnecessary for most users at this resolution, as the higher presets already deliver excellent performance.

At 1440p, the High preset at 101 FPS is the recommended choice, offering a strong balance between visual quality and smoothness. The Ultra preset at 82 FPS is also viable for players who prefer maximum detail, as it remains above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 119 FPS is the best option for those seeking higher frame rates, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often noticeable. Low settings at 137 FPS are not recommended, as the GPU has enough headroom to run higher presets comfortably.

At 4K, the Medium preset at 65 FPS is the only configuration that consistently stays above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a smooth experience. The High preset at 54 FPS is playable but may experience occasional dips below 60 FPS, which can be distracting in a fast-paced FPS. Ultra at 45 FPS is not recommended, as the frame rate drops into a range where responsiveness is compromised. Low settings at 74 FPS provide the highest frame rate at 4K, but the visual degradation is significant, making Medium the better trade-off.

The data suggests that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where it can run high or ultra settings with ease. At 4K, players should accept Medium settings to maintain smooth gameplay, or consider reducing the resolution if visual fidelity is a priority. The measured results show no configuration at 4K that achieves both high quality and high frame rates, confirming the GPU's mid-range positioning.