Doom

# Doom Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers outstanding performance in Doom, securing the 286th position out of 3,712 tested combos, placing it in the top 7.7% of all configurations evaluated. The pairing of AMD's 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU produces frame rates that range from 88 FPS at 4K Ultra to 339 FPS at 1080p Low, demonstrating that this system can handle the 2016 FPS title with substantial headroom across all resolution and settings combinations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 286 out of 3,712 tested configurations places this system firmly in the upper echelon of Doom performance. This ranking reflects the synergy between the two components, where the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities complement the GPU's high throughput. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the RTX 5080 achieves the 87th percentile among all GPUs, indicating that both components perform well above average in their respective categories.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,896 places it in close competition with several notable rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27,887, a delta of just 0%, while the Intel Core i9-10900K achieves 27,872, trailing by only 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 leads the 5800X3D by a slim margin with 27,932, representing a -0.1% delta from the perspective of the 5800X3D. The Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27,799, which is 0.3% behind. These narrow margins demonstrate that the 5800X3D remains competitive with modern processors despite its 2022 release date.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083 positions it against several AMD offerings. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, which is 0.6% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 0.7% with 55,698. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X achieves 54,828, a 2.3% deficit. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE outperforms the 5080 by 2.2% with a score of 57,367. These comparisons show the 5080 holds its own against strong competition in synthetic benchmarks, which translates to the observed in-game performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 serves as the primary driver of frame rates in Doom, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for Doom's 2016-era textures and assets, ensuring that memory capacity never becomes a limiting factor even at 4K resolution with Ultra settings.

The GPU's clock speeds are substantial, with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The memory operates at 1875 MHz, translating to 30 Gbps effective speed. These clocks, combined with 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, produce a peak FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s provide ample fill rate for the fast-paced rendering demands of Doom's demon-infested environments.

The RTX 5080 also includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, though Doom's 2016 release predates widespread ray tracing adoption, meaning these features remain largely unused in this title. The GPU's 360 W TDP and dual-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector are consistent with its high-performance positioning. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures sufficient bandwidth for data transfer, though Doom's engine does not heavily stress this connection.

Resolution Scaling

Examining the frame rate progression across resolutions reveals how the system scales under increasing graphical load. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 304 at 1920x1080 to 198 at 2560x1440, a 34.9% decrease, and further to 107 at 3840x2160, representing a 64.8% reduction from 1080p. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU maintains sufficient headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

The Low settings preset shows a similar trend with less dramatic drops. From 339 FPS at 1080p, performance falls to 269 FPS at 1440p (a 20.6% decrease) and 146 FPS at 4K (a 56.9% reduction from 1080p). The relatively smaller drop from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings suggests that the CPU is beginning to limit performance at 1080p Low, where the GPU can process frames faster than the processor can deliver them.

Medium settings exhibit the most complete dataset, including minimum and maximum frame rates. The average FPS at 1080p Medium is 323, with a minimum of 274 and maximum of 371. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 235 FPS (27.2% lower), with a minimum of 199 and maximum of 270. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 127 FPS (60.7% lower than 1080p), with a minimum of 108 and maximum of 146. The narrowing gap between minimum and maximum frame rates at higher resolutions indicates more consistent frame pacing as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

Ultra settings produce the lowest frame rates across all resolutions. The system delivers 250 FPS at 1080p, 162 FPS at 1440p (35.2% lower), and 88 FPS at 4K (64.8% lower). The 4K Ultra result of 88 FPS remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, demonstrating that this combination can maintain smooth gameplay even at the most demanding settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data suggests that the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, all settings presets deliver frame rates well above 240 FPS, with Low achieving 339 FPS, Medium at 323 FPS, High at 304 FPS, and Ultra at 250 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset provides enough performance for high-refresh-rate monitors, making the choice a matter of visual preference rather than necessity.

At 1440p, the system maintains excellent performance across all presets. High settings produce 198 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most 1440p gaming monitors. The Medium preset at 235 FPS offers a substantial performance buffer, while Ultra at 162 FPS still provides a smooth experience. For players prioritizing visual fidelity, Ultra settings at 1440p remain viable, but High settings offer a balanced compromise with only a 36 FPS difference from Ultra.

The 4K resolution presents a more interesting trade-off. Ultra settings at 88 FPS provide a playable experience but leave little headroom for demanding scenes. High settings at 107 FPS offer a more comfortable margin while maintaining most visual quality. Medium settings at 127 FPS provide the best balance for 4K gaming, delivering smooth performance with only minor visual compromises compared to High. The Low preset at 146 FPS is available for players seeking maximum performance, though the visual downgrade may not be justified given the High preset's 107 FPS result.

For players with variable refresh rate displays, the Medium preset at 4K offers the most consistent experience, with a minimum frame rate of 108 FPS ensuring minimal frame pacing issues. The High preset at 4K, while slightly lower in average FPS, may also suffice for most gaming scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 339 FPS, while Medium settings achieve 323 FPS with a minimum of 274 and maximum of 371 FPS. High settings reach 304 FPS, and Ultra settings provide 250 FPS. This progression shows a 26.3% performance penalty from Low to Ultra, a modest cost for the visual improvements offered by higher presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clear step down. Low settings average 269 FPS, Medium settings reach 235 FPS with a range of 199 to 270 FPS, High settings deliver 198 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 162 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 39.8%, indicating that the increased pixel count amplifies the performance differences between presets.

At 3840x2160, the system's performance becomes more varied across settings. Low settings average 146 FPS, Medium settings achieve 127 FPS with a minimum of 108 and maximum of 146 FPS, High settings produce 107 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 88 FPS. The performance spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 39.7%, similar to the 1440p scaling, but the absolute frame rates are significantly lower due to the 4K resolution's demands on the GPU.

The maximum frame rates recorded at Medium settings show interesting scaling. At 1080p, the maximum of 371 FPS indicates the GPU can exceed 360 FPS in less demanding scenes. At 1440p, the maximum drops to 270 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 146 FPS. The minimum frame rates follow a similar pattern, with 274 FPS at 1080p, 199 FPS at 1440p, and 108 FPS at 4K, demonstrating consistent performance scaling across resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D provides the computational foundation for this system, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture. The processor operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. Its 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a defining characteristic, providing substantial on-die storage that benefits games with large working sets.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5800X3D demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,317 and single-core score of 1,452 indicate balanced performance across both metrics. The Geekbench multicore score of 11,765 and single-core score of 2,017 further confirm this balance. The 3DMark results show scalability from 1,746 in the 2-thread test to 7,299 in the 16-thread test, with the 8-thread score of 5,906 representing the sweet spot for gaming workloads.

The PassMark results provide additional context for the CPU's capabilities. The multithread score of 28,309 and single-thread score of 3,234 show strong performance in both categories. The data compression score of 329,688 and integer math score of 88,608 indicate robust computational throughput, while the floating point math score of 50,100 and extended instructions score of 22,580 demonstrate specialized processing capabilities.

In Doom specifically, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 339 FPS, which approaches the practical limits of the processor's frame delivery capability. The relatively small performance difference between Low and Medium settings at 1080p (339 vs 323 FPS) suggests the CPU is starting to become a limiting factor, as the GPU has spare capacity at these frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU's performance headroom ensures it does not constrain frame rates.

The 5800X3D's 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs and its competitive standing against rivals like the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U confirm that this processor remains a capable gaming CPU. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration is well-suited for modern game engines, including the id Tech engine powering Doom, which can utilize multiple threads for rendering and physics calculations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Doom?

A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 provides the best balance of performance and visual quality. At High settings, the system delivers 198 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most 1440p monitors. At 4K, the system still performs well with 107 FPS at High settings, but 1440p offers more headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083 places it 2.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE's score of 57,367. It leads the AMD Radeon 8060S by 0.6% (55,757) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.7% (55,698). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3% with a score of 54,828.

Q: Can this system achieve 4K 60 FPS in Doom?

A: Yes, the system exceeds 60 FPS at all settings presets at 4K. The lowest measured average is 88 FPS at Ultra settings, while Low settings achieve 146 FPS. Medium settings provide the most consistent experience with a minimum frame rate of 108 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 250 at 1920x1080 to 88 at 3840x2160, representing a 64.8% decrease. This significant reduction highlights the GPU's increasing workload at higher resolutions, though the 4K result of 88 FPS remains playable.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X3D compare to the Intel Core i9-10900K?

A: The 5800X3D's average benchmark score of 27,896 is 0.1% higher than the Core i9-10900K's score of 27,872. This negligible difference indicates nearly identical synthetic performance between the two processors, despite their architectural differences and release dates.

Q: Which settings preset offers the most consistent frame pacing at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 shows the most consistent performance with an average of 235 FPS, a minimum of 199 FPS, and a maximum of 270 FPS. The 71 FPS range indicates some variability, but the minimum frame rate remains well above refresh rate thresholds for smooth gameplay.