Doom

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination delivers exceptional performance in Doom, ranking 103rd out of 3712 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top 2.8% of all configurations, a position driven almost entirely by the RTX 5090's raw rendering power. The data shows a system capable of triple-digit frame rates at 4K and refresh-rate-shattering performance at lower resolutions, making it a definitive choice for high-refresh-rate displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 103 out of 3712 tested configurations puts it in the 97th percentile of all CPU-GPU pairings tested for Doom. This is a top-tier result, though not the absolute pinnacle, indicating that while the hardware is extremely potent, there remain a handful of more exotic or better-matched combinations above it. The ranking reflects the synergy between a high-end CPU and a flagship GPU, but the GPU is clearly the dominant contributor to this placement.

Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 5090 sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79842. Its nearest rivals in that metric include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (scoring 79605, a 0.3% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (scoring 78940, 1.1% lower). The CPU, meanwhile, ranks in the 77th percentile among all processors, with an average score of 24964. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, which scores 25005, just 0.2% higher. This data suggests the GPU is performing at the very edge of its class, while the CPU is solidly above average but not a record-holder.

This combination’s high rank is consistent across the measured frame rates, which show no signs of CPU bottlenecking at any resolution. The data suggests that the 7500F provides enough throughput to keep the RTX 5090 fed, allowing the GPU to stretch its legs fully. In practical terms, this means the score reflects a balanced system where the GPU is the limiting factor, which is the ideal scenario for gaming performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This configuration provides strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for Doom’s engine, and enough multi-threading headroom to handle background tasks without interfering with frame pacing.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 22799 in multi-core. These scores place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms a majority of processors but is not at the absolute top tier. For Doom, which relies heavily on per-core performance for game logic and draw calls, the 5.00 GHz boost clock is the most relevant specification. The data shows that at 1080p, where the CPU load is highest relative to the GPU, the system still achieves an average of 401 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the CPU is not a limiting factor.

The chip’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample data throughput for modern game engines. Its 65W TDP is modest, and it fits into the AMD Socket AM5 platform. Compared to its nearest CPU rivals, the 7500F is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1% higher score) and the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2% higher score), but it is slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F. This indicates that the CPU’s performance is well within the expected range for its class, and its contribution to Doom’s frame rates is consistent with its benchmark standing.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the clear star of this configuration. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, uses the GB202 chip, and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a massive 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. Its core clocks are rated at 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, which, combined with 21760 shading units, allows for a staggering 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

This hardware makes the RTX 5090 a top-2% GPU, ranking in the 92nd percentile. Its average benchmark score of 79842 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79605 (a 0.3% difference). However, the RTX 5090 is designed for gaming, with DirectX 12 Ultimate support and a 575W TDP, whereas the Tesla is a compute-oriented card. The data shows the 5090 excels in gaming workloads, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355.

For Doom, the GPU’s role is to render the fast-paced, detailed environments at high frame rates. The 32 GB of VRAM is far more than the game requires, ensuring no texture swapping or memory pressure at any resolution or setting. The 2407 MHz boost clock and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensure that the GPU can process the geometry and textures of Doom’s hellish landscapes without stutter. The result is that the GPU is the primary driver of the measured FPS, and its performance scales predictably as resolution and settings change.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo show a clear hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), the system achieves an average of 117 FPS on High settings, 139 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 118 and maximum of 160), 159 FPS on Low, and 96 FPS on Ultra. This indicates that even at 4K Ultra, the system remains comfortably above 60 FPS, and at High settings, it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 4K monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance jumps significantly. The average FPS on High is 216, on Medium it is 256 (with a minimum of 218 and a maximum of 295), on Low it reaches 294, and on Ultra it drops to 177. These numbers show that at 1440p, the system is capable of driving 240Hz-class monitors even on High settings, with only the Ultra preset falling below that threshold.

At 1920x1080, the performance is astronomical. The average FPS on High is 334, on Medium it is 382 (with a minimum of 325 and a maximum of 439), on Low it peaks at 401, and on Ultra it sits at 273. This level of performance means the system is effectively limited by the display’s refresh rate rather than the hardware. The data shows no signs of CPU bottlenecking at this resolution, as the frame rates scale consistently with the GPU’s capabilities.

The data also reveals a consistent pattern: Medium settings often provide the best balance of visual quality and frame rate stability, with the highest minimum FPS recorded at each resolution. For example, at 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS is 218, which is higher than the average FPS of the High preset (216). This suggests that Medium settings offer a more consistent experience, avoiding frame dips that might occur on higher presets.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Doom at 4K with high refresh rates?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the system averages 117 FPS. At Medium settings, it averages 139 FPS with a minimum of 118 FPS, which is sufficient for a 120Hz display.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its closest rival in terms of benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, scores 79605, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, which is 1.1% lower.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a bottleneck for the RTX 5090 in Doom?

A: No. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves an average of 401 FPS, indicating that the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock is sufficient for Doom’s single-threaded demands.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 401, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, which is 0.1% lower.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 96, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 4K displays, the High preset offers the best experience, delivering an average of 117 FPS. This is high enough for smooth gameplay on 120Hz panels, and it provides better visual fidelity than the Medium preset, which averages 139 FPS but with lower image quality. The Ultra preset, at 96 FPS average, is only recommended for players who prioritize maximum visual detail over frame rate and are using a 60Hz or 90Hz display.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the sweet spot, averaging 216 FPS. This is sufficient for 240Hz monitors, and the visual quality is excellent. The Medium preset offers a higher average (256 FPS) and a higher minimum (218 FPS), making it a better choice for competitive play where frame consistency is paramount. The Ultra preset, at 177 FPS, is still viable for 144Hz displays but sacrifices some frame rate headroom.

At 1080p, the High preset averages 334 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor, including 360Hz panels. The Medium preset, averaging 382 FPS, is even better for competitive gaming, with the highest minimum FPS (325) across all settings at this resolution. The Low preset, at 401 FPS, offers the absolute highest frame rates but at a significant visual quality cost. For the best balance of speed and visuals at 1080p, the Medium preset is recommended, as it provides a substantial frame rate boost over High without a major visual penalty. In general, the data suggests that Medium settings offer the most stable frame times across all resolutions, making it the ideal choice for players who prioritize a consistent experience over marginal visual gains.