Dave The Diver

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Dave The Diver, a title that clearly favors high refresh rates. The data shows a combo that never drops below 68 FPS even at maximum settings in 4K, indicating a well-balanced system for this specific adventure game. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the ranking, and provides actionable settings guidance based solely on the provided benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, using the Vermeer codename on a 7 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This CPU features a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The processor sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36,945.

In the context of Dave The Diver, the CPU’s role is evident in the frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, the RTX 5050 is capable of producing very high frame rates, reaching 206 FPS on Low settings. The fact that the 5600F can feed the GPU enough data to sustain these numbers indicates that its 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for the game's logic and physics. The PassMark single-thread score of 2,872 and multithread score of 19,236 suggest a strong foundation for maintaining consistent frame pacing, even when many on-screen elements require simultaneous updates.

The benchmark results show that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. For instance, at 1080p High, the average FPS is 154, while at 1440p High it drops to 116. This 38 FPS difference is primarily attributable to the increased GPU load from more pixels, not a CPU limitation. The CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rivals is notable; it is statistically tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (0% delta), and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 by 0.4%. This places it in a highly competitive tier, ensuring that the processor’s capabilities are not a limiting factor in this game's performance profile.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600F and RTX 5050 achieves a rank of 1,725 out of 2,867 tested combos in Dave The Diver. This places the pairing in the top 40% of all systems tested, which is a strong showing for a mid-range configuration. The ranking suggests that while many high-end systems with flagship CPUs and GPUs will outperform it, this combo delivers a level of performance that is superior to the majority of tested hardware configurations for this specific game.

The rank reflects the holistic performance of the pairing, indicating that the balance between the 5600F’s processing power and the RTX 5050’s graphics capabilities is well-suited for the game’s demands. A rank of 1,725 implies that the system is not at the top tier, but it is far from the bottom, offering a reliable experience that will satisfy most users. The data shows that this combo is positioned in a "sweet spot" where the CPU and GPU complement each other effectively, avoiding the pitfalls of a severe bottleneck in either direction. The percentileVsAllGpus score of 66 for the RTX 5050 and 85 for the CPU further supports this, showing the GPU is the more limiting component, but the CPU has enough headroom to support it well.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear pattern of scaling that identifies the GPU as the primary performance limiter as resolution increases. At 1080p High, the average frame rate is 154 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the frame rate drops by 38 FPS to 116 FPS, a decrease of roughly 25%. Scaling up to 4K High, the frame rate falls to 77 FPS, which is a further drop of 39 FPS from the 1440p result. This consistent decline with each resolution step is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario.

The scaling pattern is even more pronounced when looking at the Low settings preset. At 1080p Low, the system produces 206 FPS. At 1440p Low, this drops to 155 FPS, and at 4K Low, it is 104 FPS. The absolute frame rates are higher, but the proportional drop between 1080p and 4K is similar, reinforcing that the graphics card's rendering throughput is the constraining factor. The CPU has already provided the necessary data for the frame; the RTX 5050 is simply taking longer to rasterize the larger image.

This behavior confirms that the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 5050 at all tested resolutions. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates at 1080p and 1440p would be much closer together, as the GPU would be waiting for the CPU to finish its work. Instead, the steady FPS decline with resolution indicates that the GPU’s fill rate and pixel processing capabilities are the determining factor for maximum performance in Dave The Diver.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following breakdown provides the exact average frame rates measured for the Ryzen 5 5600F and RTX 5050 combination, along with the available minimum and maximum data for the Medium preset.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: Average 206 FPS.
• Medium: Average 172 FPS, with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS.
• High: Average 154 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 136 FPS.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: Average 155 FPS.
• Medium: Average 129 FPS, with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS.
• High: Average 116 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 102 FPS.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: Average 104 FPS.
• Medium: Average 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS.
• High: Average 77 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 68 FPS.

The data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 34 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs 18 FPS, and High to Ultra costs another 18 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that the Low preset removes significant graphical features, while the difference between High and Ultra is more modest in terms of performance cost. The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS, providing a sense of frame pacing; at 1080p Medium, the game fluctuates between 146 and 198 FPS, indicating a generally smooth experience.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution to play Dave The Diver with this combo for a 144Hz monitor?

A: The 1440p High preset yields an average of 116 FPS, which is below a 144Hz refresh rate. To fully utilize a 144Hz display, the 1080p High preset, with an average of 154 FPS, is the most suitable choice from the measured data.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Dave The Diver?

A: Yes. The data shows that at 4K with the Ultra preset, the system achieves an average of 68 FPS, which is playable. For a smoother 4K experience, dropping to High settings increases the average to 77 FPS, and Low settings push it to 104 FPS.

Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the average frame rate increases from 102 FPS on Ultra to 155 FPS on Low. This represents a 53 FPS improvement, or approximately a 52% increase in average frame rate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the main bottleneck. As resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the frame rates drop significantly, which is the expected behavior when the graphics card is the limiting component. The CPU’s high percentile ranking and strong single-thread score suggest it has sufficient headroom.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 4K?

A: The High preset averages 77 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 68 FPS. The Ultra preset is 9 FPS slower, a performance cost of roughly 12%, which may or may not be worth the visual improvements, depending on user preference.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo in the benchmark data?

A: The only minimum FPS values recorded are for the Medium preset. The lowest minimum is 74 FPS at 4K Medium, while the 1080p Medium preset shows a minimum of 146 FPS and the 1440p Medium preset shows a minimum of 110 FPS.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user's display and performance goals. For users with a 1080p 60Hz display, every preset provides an average FPS well above 60, so the Ultra preset at 136 FPS is the clear recommendation for maximum visual fidelity without any performance concerns. For those with a 1080p 144Hz or 165Hz monitor, the High preset at 154 FPS is the best choice, as it comfortably exceeds the refresh rate, and the jump to Medium (172 FPS) provides diminishing returns for the loss in graphical quality.

At 1440p, the situation is more nuanced. The Ultra preset averages 102 FPS, which is excellent for a 100Hz monitor. The High preset at 116 FPS is ideal for 120Hz displays, offering a good balance between visual quality and speed. The Medium preset at 129 FPS is the best option for those with a 144Hz monitor, as it is the highest quality preset that comes close to saturating that refresh rate. The Low preset at 155 FPS is only recommended for competitive play where frame rate is the absolute priority.

For 4K resolution, the Ultra preset at 68 FPS is suitable for a 60Hz display, providing the highest fidelity experience. However, users who prefer a smoother experience should select the High preset at 77 FPS, which offers a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 87 FPS is a strong middle ground, and the Low preset at 104 FPS is the best choice for those who want to maximize frame rate on a high-refresh 4K panel. Overall, the High preset at 1440p, with its 116 FPS average, represents the most balanced recommendation for overall quality and speed.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB207 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS.

The RTX 5050’s performance in Dave The Diver is directly tied to its pixel processing capabilities. The GPU’s 32 ROPs are responsible for the final pixel output, and the data shows that this is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game at the tested settings, as no issues with texture streaming or memory allocation are evident from the FPS data. The GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS of compute power is more than adequate for the game’s rendering demands, and the 320.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that textures and geometry can be fed to the cores quickly enough to maintain the high frame rates observed at 1080p and 1440p.

The GPU’s percentile ranking of 66 places it in the upper two-thirds of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 21,035 is competitive. The nearest rival data shows it is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which has a 1.6% higher score, while it is 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and 1.6% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile. In Dave The Diver, the RTX 5050 demonstrates that it can deliver very high refresh rates at 1080p and remains playable at 4K, confirming that its VRAM capacity and clock speeds are well-suited for the visual complexity of this adventure title.