Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 137 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 63 | 85 | 102 |
| 1440p QHD | 88 | 113 | 151 | 182 |
| 1080p Full HD | 133 | 171 | 229 | 275 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i3-12100F + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
Counter-Strike 2 with an Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B570 produces a highly playable experience across most settings, but the data clearly identifies the optimal balance between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 275 FPS average, while the High preset drops to 171 FPS. The Medium preset offers a middle ground at 229 FPS average, with a minimum of 194 FPS, ensuring consistent performance above 144Hz refresh rates. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 182 FPS, but High drops to 113 FPS, and Medium sits at 151 FPS. For 4K (3840x2160), the experience becomes more demanding: Low yields 102 FPS, Medium 85 FPS, High 63 FPS, and Ultra 49 FPS. The data suggests that for competitive play at 1080p, the Low preset maximizes frame rates, but the High preset at 171 FPS remains well above the 144Hz threshold for most monitors. At 1440p, Medium at 151 FPS provides the best experience for high-refresh displays, while 4K users should stick to Low or Medium to stay above 60 FPS, as High at 63 FPS is borderline and Ultra at 49 FPS is too sluggish for a competitive shooter.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows indicate that the Low preset is the performance king, but it is not always necessary to sacrifice visuals. At 1920x1080, Low produces 275 FPS average, which is exceptional for 240Hz displays. However, High at 171 FPS still clears 144Hz comfortably, and Medium at 229 FPS offers a strong compromise for users with 165Hz or 180Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 133 FPS, which is playable but below the 144Hz mark; for competitive integrity, High or Medium is superior. At 2560x1440, the gap widens: Low at 182 FPS is ideal, Medium at 151 FPS remains excellent for 144Hz panels, but High at 113 FPS and Ultra at 88 FPS fall short of high-refresh targets. The most balanced recommendation is Medium at 1440p, as it holds a minimum of 129 FPS, ensuring no noticeable stutter. For 4K, the situation is stark: Low at 102 FPS is the only preset that guarantees a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, with Medium at 85 FPS also viable, but High at 63 FPS and Ultra at 49 FPS are not recommended for fast-paced action. The data shows that Medium is the sweet spot for 1080p and 1440p, while Low is the pragmatic choice for 4K.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570’s memory configuration is a defining factor in these results. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for Counter-Strike 2 at the tested resolutions, even at 4K, where the game’s texture demands are moderate. The GPU’s clocks are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This static clock behavior suggests consistent performance under load, as there is no boost variance to cause frame-time spikes. The 18 RT cores and 2304 shading units are not heavily stressed by this title, which relies more on rasterization. The FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS provides ample compute headroom, as evidenced by the 4K Medium result of 85 FPS, which is respectable for a mid-range card. The 150 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate this is a power-efficient solution, but the actual power draw is not part of the measured data. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556, places it just ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 0.1% and the Intel Arc A750 by 0.1%, showing it is competitive in its class. The 10 GB frame buffer prevents VRAM bottlenecks at 4K, where High settings still manage 63 FPS, though the drop to Ultra at 49 FPS suggests shading and geometry complexity, not memory capacity, is the limiting factor.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Counter-Strike 2, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2286 out of 2870 combos. This places it in the lower quarter of all tested systems, which is surprising given the playable frame rates observed. The combo’s rank reflects the broader spectrum of hardware tested, including high-end CPUs and GPUs that achieve far higher FPS. However, the percentile position does not diminish the practical results: at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 275 FPS, which is in the top tier of competitive performance. The discrepancy between rank and experience is due to the CPU’s modest 4-core, 8-thread configuration, which may bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, and the combo’s rank improves relative to other pairings. The data shows that this combination is not a top-tier performer, but it delivers a smooth experience for most players, especially at 1080p and 1440p with Medium or Low settings. The 68th percentile CPU ranking and 65th percentile GPU ranking suggest both components are mid-pack, but their synergy in this game yields results that outperform the sum of their parts, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth shine.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured FPS shows a clear progression: Low yields 275 FPS average, Medium drops to 229 FPS with a minimum of 194 and maximum of 263, High settles at 171 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 133 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 194 FPS is notable, as it indicates the combo can sustain high frame rates without severe dips, making it suitable for 165Hz monitors. At 2560x1440, the results scale predictably: Low achieves 182 FPS, Medium 151 FPS with a minimum of 129 and maximum of 174, High 113 FPS, and Ultra 88 FPS. The 1440p Medium minimum of 129 FPS is just above the 120Hz threshold, providing a stable experience for standard high-refresh panels. At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop significantly: Low 102 FPS, Medium 85 FPS with a minimum of 72 and maximum of 97, High 63 FPS, and Ultra 49 FPS. The 4K Medium minimum of 72 FPS is crucial, as it ensures the combo does not fall below 60 FPS, but High and Ultra are not viable for competitive play. The data reveals that the gap between Low and Medium is smaller at 4K (17 FPS) than at 1080p (46 FPS), indicating that the GPU is more constrained at higher resolutions, while at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 893) becomes a factor. Across all resolutions, the Ultra preset’s average FPS is roughly half of Low, highlighting the heavy cost of maximum settings in this title.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Counter-Strike 2 at 144Hz on a 1440p monitor?
A: Yes, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 achieves 151 FPS average with a minimum of 129 FPS, which comfortably exceeds 144Hz for most of the session. The Low preset at 182 FPS also works, but High at 113 FPS is below the 144Hz target.
Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this hardware?
A: The Low preset at 3840x2160 delivers 102 FPS average, which is the only setting that provides a substantial margin above 60 FPS. Medium at 85 FPS is also playable, but High at 63 FPS and Ultra at 49 FPS are too close to or below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B570’s 10 GB VRAM enough for this game at maximum settings?
A: The 10 GB frame buffer is sufficient, as the Ultra preset at 4K runs out of GPU compute power (49 FPS) rather than memory capacity. The GPU’s 380 GB/s bandwidth also appears adequate, given that the frame rate drops are consistent with rendering load, not memory swapping.
Q: How does the i3-12100F compare to its closest CPU rivals?
A: The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452) and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1250U (13351). It is 0.7% behind the Intel Core 5 120UL (13594), making it statistically tied with these processors in synthetic tests.
Q: Does the combo’s low rank (2286 out of 2870) mean it is bad for this game?
A: No, the rank reflects the entire database of combos, which includes many high-end systems. The measured FPS shows it is more than capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 275 FPS at 1080p Low and 151 FPS at 1440p Medium, which are strong results for mid-range hardware.
Q: What is the minimum FPS I can expect at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?
A: The data shows a minimum of 194 FPS at 1080p Medium, with an average of 229 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. This means the combo will not drop below 194 FPS, ensuring a very stable experience on high-refresh monitors.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. It has 12 MB of shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s role is primarily single-thread performance, as the game is known for being latency-sensitive. The 3dmark single-thread score of 893 and the passmark single-thread score of 3444 indicate solid per-core performance for a budget chip. This is evident in the 1080p Low result of 275 FPS, where the CPU must feed the GPU quickly; the 4-core design handles this well, but the 8-thread limit shows in the gap between Low and Ultra. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860 suggests that the CPU can handle background tasks, but in-game, the single-core boost to 4.30 GHz is what matters. The CPU’s 68th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average score of 13494, places it close to the Intel Core 3 N355 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i5-9500 (0.3% ahead). This indicates that the i3-12100F is not a bottleneck at higher resolutions; at 4K, the GPU’s 63 FPS on High is likely limited by the Arc B570, not the CPU. However, at 1080p Low, the 275 FPS is near the practical limit for this CPU’s thread count, as adding more cores would likely not improve FPS significantly. The 58 W TDP and 10 nm process make it an efficient choice, but the lack of integrated graphics means the Arc B570 is mandatory. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes ensures the GPU has ample bandwidth, even though the Arc B570 runs on PCIe 4.0 x8. Overall, the i3-12100F provides enough single-thread grunt for high FPS in Counter-Strike 2, but it is the GPU that dictates performance at 1440p and 4K, where the combo’s ranking of 2286 out of 2870 reflects a balanced but not top-tier setup.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + Intel Arc B570 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 182.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 151.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 113.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 88.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 275.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 229.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 171.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 133.0 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.