Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
68
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 40 45 63
1440p QHD 52 59 67 94
1080p Full HD 68 78 88 124

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 67
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Ultra 52
1920x1080 Low 124
1920x1080 Medium 88
1920x1080 High 78
1920x1080 Ultra 68

Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

Control is a demanding Action Adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, and the measured results for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination reveal a system that is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p but begins to show its limits as resolution and settings increase. The data indicates that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, with a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate at higher resolutions. The benchmark results show a consistent hierarchy across all tested resolutions, with Low settings providing the highest average frame rates and Ultra providing the lowest, making the choice of preset a critical decision for the user based on their display and performance preferences.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 78 FPS, which is a smooth and highly playable experience for most users. This is a significant jump from the Ultra preset, which averages 68 FPS, and only a 10 FPS drop from the Medium preset's 88 FPS. The High preset strikes a strong balance between visual quality and performance, making it the recommended default for 1080p gaming. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 1080p yields an average of 124 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or for maximizing smoothness, though it comes at the cost of reduced graphical detail.

At 2560x1440, the data shows that the High preset averages 59 FPS, which is just on the edge of smoothness for many players. The Medium preset averages 67 FPS, providing a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 52 FPS, which may feel less fluid. The Low preset at 1440p averages 94 FPS, offering a very responsive experience, but the visual compromise is more pronounced at this resolution. For a balanced experience at 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it offers a 15 FPS advantage over High and a 15 FPS advantage over Ultra, while maintaining a playable frame rate above 60 FPS.

Moving to 3840x2160, the situation becomes more challenging. The High preset averages only 40 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 45 FPS, both of which are below the standard 60 FPS target and may result in noticeable stutter. The Ultra preset at 4K averages just 35 FPS, which is a poor experience for a game like Control that benefits from fast, precise action. The Low preset at 4K averages 63 FPS, providing the only playable option at this resolution. The data suggests that for a 4K display, users should either select the Low preset to achieve a playable frame rate or consider lowering the resolution, as the visual improvements from higher settings do not justify the significant performance cost.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the primary component responsible for rendering the game's visuals, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s plays a critical role in the measured performance. The GPU's base clock is 2317 MHz, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and it features 2560 shading units. The benchmark results show a clear pattern where frame rates decline as settings increase, which is characteristic of a GPU that is being increasingly taxed by higher graphical workloads. At 1080p, the GPU is able to maintain high frame rates, but as the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become limiting factors, as evidenced by the significant drop in average FPS.

The RTX 5050's performance relative to other GPUs, as measured by its average benchmark score of 21035, places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which has a deltaPct of 1.6, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which is 0.6% slower. This indicates that the RTX 5050 is a mid-range performer, and the game data confirms this, as it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data suggests that at 4K with high-detail textures, the memory capacity and bandwidth may be insufficient, contributing to the lower average frame rates observed at that resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent trend of decreasing performance as resolution increases. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 78. This drops to 59 at 1440p High, a 24.4% decrease, and then further to 40 at 4K High, a 48.7% decrease from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 5050 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the GPU's rendering workload increases exponentially with the number of pixels. The CPU's role becomes less significant at higher resolutions, as the GPU is unable to keep up with the demand, but at 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as evidenced by the relatively smaller frame rate differences between settings at this resolution.

The data also shows how the performance gap between settings changes with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (124 FPS) and Ultra (68 FPS) is 56 FPS. At 1440p, the difference between Low (94 FPS) and Ultra (52 FPS) is 42 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (63 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) is 28 FPS. This narrowing gap at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, as the absolute frame rate ceiling is lowered, and the relative impact of settings is reduced. The system is clearly more CPU-bound at 1080p, where the Ryzen 5 7400F can push the GPU to its limits, but the GPU-bound nature of 4K gaming is evident in the overall lower frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

In the comprehensive database of tested combinations for Control, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1756 out of 2888 total combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is also not among the weakest systems tested. The rank suggests that many other CPU and GPU combinations are capable of delivering higher frame rates in this game, likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs. The combo's ranking is a direct result of the mid-range nature of both components, with the RTX 5050's 66th percentile GPU score and the Ryzen 5 7400F's 83rd percentile CPU score contributing to a system that is competent but not exceptional for Control.

The relative ranking of this combo can be understood by comparing its components to others in the database. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, have very similar average benchmark scores, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This indicates that the CPU is well-matched with its peers. However, the GPU's performance is more variable, with the nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, being 1.6% faster. This slight deficit in GPU performance, combined with the game's demanding nature, is likely a key factor in the combo's overall ranking. The data implies that users with this combo should not expect to compete with higher-end systems in Control, but the measured FPS shows it is still viable for 1080p gaming.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. In the context of Control, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, which are all significant in this action-adventure title. The benchmark results show that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to achieve high frame rates, as seen in the Low preset's 124 FPS average. This suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions and settings.

However, the data also indicates that the CPU's performance is a factor at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 68, which is a significant drop from the Low preset. While this is largely due to the GPU's increased workload, the CPU's single-thread performance also plays a role in maintaining frame rates. The Ryzen 5 7400F's Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3072, and its multi-core score is 21765, which are solid numbers that place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, have an average score that is 0.2% higher, indicating that the 7400F is a competitive mid-range processor. The data shows that for 1080p gaming, the CPU provides ample performance, but at 4K, its role diminishes as the GPU becomes the primary limiter.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination, as recorded in the data.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

  • Low: 124 FPS average
  • Medium: 88 FPS average, with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS
  • High: 78 FPS average
  • Ultra: 68 FPS average

These figures show that at 1080p, the system is capable of delivering very high frame rates on Low settings, making it ideal for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming. The Medium preset provides a good balance, with a minimum FPS of 75, ensuring smooth gameplay. The High preset is still very playable, while the Ultra preset, at 68 FPS, is at the lower end of the smoothness threshold but remains acceptable for most users.

At 2560x1440, the results are:

  • Low: 94 FPS average
  • Medium: 67 FPS average, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS
  • High: 59 FPS average
  • Ultra: 52 FPS average

At 1440p, the frame rates drop noticeably. The Low preset remains highly playable at 94 FPS, but the Medium preset's minimum of 57 FPS indicates that there may be occasional dips below 60 FPS. The High and Ultra presets are both below 60 FPS on average, which may be less desirable for a game like Control. The data suggests that users at 1440p should stick to Medium or Low settings for a consistently smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the results are:

  • Low: 63 FPS average
  • Medium: 45 FPS average, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS
  • High: 40 FPS average
  • Ultra: 35 FPS average

The 4K results are the most challenging for this combo. Only the Low preset achieves an average frame rate above 60 FPS, while all other settings fall below the playable threshold. The Medium preset's minimum of 38 FPS and maximum of 52 FPS shows significant frame time inconsistency, which can lead to a stuttery experience. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended for 4K gaming with this hardware, as they result in average frame rates in the 30-40 FPS range, which is generally considered too low for a smooth action game.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1080p display?

A: The High preset is recommended, as it delivers an average of 78 FPS, providing a good balance between visual quality and performance. The Low preset offers a much higher 124 FPS average for competitive play, while the Ultra preset averages 68 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?

A: Only with the Low preset, which averages 63 FPS. All other settings at 4K, including Medium (45 FPS), High (40 FPS), and Ultra (35 FPS), result in average frame rates below 60 FPS and are not recommended for a smooth experience.

Q: How does the RTX 5050's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, has an average score of 20713, which is 1.6% lower, making the RTX 5050 slightly faster.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the data shows a large frame rate difference between Low (124 FPS) and Ultra (68 FPS), suggesting the GPU is the primary limiter, as the CPU is capable of driving higher frame rates.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in the database for Control?

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1756 out of 2888 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the rankings.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: The minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is 57 FPS, with an average of 67 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.0
3840x2160 High 40.0
3840x2160 Ultra 35.0
2560x1440 Low 94.0
2560x1440 Medium 67.0
2560x1440 High 59.0
2560x1440 Ultra 52.0
1920x1080 Low 124.0
1920x1080 Medium 88.0
1920x1080 High 78.0
1920x1080 Ultra 68.0

Control with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.