Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing delivers a solid 1080p experience in Control, but the data shows it is not a 4K powerhouse. The combo ranks in the 57th percentile among all tested CPU-GPU pairings, which is competitive for its class. The measured results indicate that while the RX 9060 provides the graphical muscle for high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, the Ryzen 5 5600G’s six Zen 3 cores and high boost clock keep the system balanced. This analysis breaks down the exact performance figures, contextualizes them against rivals, and provides practical settings advice based solely on the measured data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*

A: 1920x1080 is the strongest target. The measured data shows an average of 82 FPS at High settings, 92 FPS at Medium, and 130 FPS at Low. At 2560x1440, High settings drop to 62 FPS, and at 3840x2160, High settings only reach 42 FPS.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested CPU-GPU pairings for Control?*

A: It ranks 1632nd out of 2888 total tested combinations. This places it in the middle-to-upper tier, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is far from a low-end configuration and can handle the game comfortably at standard resolutions.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest average frame rate in the data?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 yields the highest average at 130 FPS. However, the Medium preset at the same resolution still provides a highly playable 92 FPS, which offers a better balance of visual quality and performance.

*Q: Is the RX 9060’s 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Control at 4K?*

A: The data suggests it is not ideal. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset only achieves 36 FPS, and High reaches 42 FPS. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are on par with the RTX 3060 Ti, but the average frame rates at 4K are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600G compare to its nearest CPU rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G has an average benchmark score of 21088. This is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i3-1220P (21066) and 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (21133). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V by 0.1% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U by 0.4%.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The only minimum FPS values provided are for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 78 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 59 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 40 FPS. No minimum values are listed for Low, High, or Ultra presets.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a Navi 44 chip, featuring 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs. Its boost clock of 2990 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz are the primary drivers of raw rasterization performance. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a critical factor in Control, as the game’s particle effects and physics simulations benefit from high bandwidth. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. For instance, moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings reduces the average FPS from 82 to 62, a 24% drop. The same settings at 3840x2160 yield only 42 FPS, a 49% reduction from the 1080p result. This indicates that the RX 9060’s 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus struggle to feed the pixel pipeline at 4K.

The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average benchmark score of 16129, just 0.7% higher than the RX 9060’s 16014. This suggests that in general compute tasks, the two are nearly identical. However, in Control, the RX 9060’s performance at High settings (82 FPS at 1080p) shows it can handle the game’s DirectX 12 workload effectively. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern rendering features, but the measured data does not include ray tracing benchmarks. The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s are impressive for the class, which explains why the card can maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the card’s 36 FPS average suggests that the 64 ROPs are overwhelmed by the sheer number of pixels, making high-refresh 4K gaming unrealistic for this setup.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of 2888 tested CPU-GPU combinations for Control, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 5600G and RX 9060 holds the 1632nd position. This ranking places it in the 57th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all tested systems. While not a top-tier combination, it is important to contextualize this rank. The CPU itself sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21088, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile with a score of 16014. The combo rank being lower than the individual component percentiles suggests that the CPU is slightly more capable than the GPU in this pairing, but neither component is drastically holding the other back.

Comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals, the RX 9060 is 0.7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti, 1% faster than the AMD Radeon R9 370X, and 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700. This indicates that the RX 9060 is positioned in a competitive mid-range segment. The combo’s rank of 1632 is a reflection of this mid-range status. For a game like Control, which is known for its demanding physics and visual effects, this pairing is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The data shows that at 2560x1440 Medium settings, the combo achieves 70 FPS, which is a smooth experience. The rank also indicates that there are 1256 configurations that perform better, likely featuring higher-end GPUs or CPUs, but the gap in real-world performance at 1080p is minimal, as evidenced by the 130 FPS average at Low settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo performs admirably. Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings yield 92 FPS with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS, indicating consistent frame pacing. High settings drop to 82 FPS, while Ultra settings average 71 FPS. All these figures are above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, making 1080p a sweet spot for this hardware.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down but remains playable. Low settings average 98 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings average 70 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, showing that the system can handle 1440p with minor tweaks. High settings drop to 62 FPS, which is borderline for 60 Hz displays but still playable. Ultra settings average 54 FPS, which may exhibit noticeable stutter on some displays. The data suggests that 1440p Medium is the optimal balance for this resolution, as it stays above the 60 FPS line in the average and minimum readings.

At 3840x2160, the resolution is clearly too demanding for this GPU. Low settings average 66 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 47 FPS with a minimum of 40 FPS. High settings average 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 36 FPS. These figures are below the 60 FPS target for most gamers, and the minimum FPS readings for Medium (40 FPS) indicate that the experience could be inconsistent. The 4K data shows that the RX 9060 is not a 4K gaming card for this title, as even Low settings struggle to maintain a high frame rate. The performance gap between 1440p and 4K is substantial, with High settings dropping from 62 FPS to 42 FPS, a 32% reduction.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which are critical for gaming performance. The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for the RX 9060. In general benchmarks, the CPU scores 10551 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1409 in single-core, indicating strong single-thread performance that is essential for Control’s game logic and physics. The single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark is particularly relevant, as many game engines are still limited by single-core performance.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 21088 places it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its performance. This indicates that the 5600G is a well-balanced processor that will not bottleneck the RX 9060 in most scenarios. In the Control benchmarks, the CPU’s impact is most visible at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. For example, at 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo achieves 130 FPS, and at 1440p Low, it achieves 98 FPS. These high frame rates suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough draw calls to maintain high performance. The 4.40 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for maintaining high minimum frame rates, as seen in the 1080p Medium minimum of 78 FPS.

The CPU’s 65W TDP and 7nm process node ensure it runs cool and efficiently, which is beneficial for smaller form factor builds. However, its PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes) is a potential limitation, as the RX 9060 supports PCIe 5.0 x16. In practice, this may not significantly impact performance in Control, as the game’s asset streaming is unlikely to saturate the Gen 3 bandwidth. The CPU’s L3 cache of 16 MB is modest compared to some modern chips, but the data shows that it is sufficient for this game, as the combo does not exhibit severe frame drops in the measured results.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimizing the Control experience with this hardware. For 1920x1080 displays, the Medium preset is the best overall choice. It delivers an average of 92 FPS with a minimum of 78 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. High settings at 82 FPS are also viable, but the jump from Medium to High only yields a 10 FPS decrease while providing marginal visual improvements. Ultra settings at 71 FPS are playable but may not be worth the performance cost. Low settings at 130 FPS are ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, but the visual quality suffers significantly.

For 2560x1440 displays, the Medium preset is again the recommended choice. It averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 62 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz monitors, but the minimum FPS data is not provided, so Medium offers more safety margin. Low settings at 98 FPS provide a smoother experience if visual quality is less important. Ultra settings at 54 FPS are not recommended, as the average dips below the 60 FPS mark.

For 3840x2160 displays, the data suggests that this combo is not suitable for high-quality 4K gaming. Low settings average 66 FPS, which is the only preset that provides a consistently playable experience. Medium settings at 47 FPS and High at 42 FPS are below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra at 36 FPS is not recommended. If a 4K display is mandatory, users should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or accepting Low settings. The performance delta between Medium and Low at 4K is 19 FPS, which is substantial, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. Overall, the data strongly favors 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium as the best settings presets for a balanced experience.