Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
91
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 91 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 54 60 85
1440p QHD 69 79 89 126
1080p Full HD 91 105 118 166

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 85
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Ultra 47
2560x1440 Low 126
2560x1440 Medium 89
2560x1440 High 79
2560x1440 Ultra 69
1920x1080 Low 166
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 High 105
1920x1080 Ultra 91

Control with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, with benchmark data showing a clear performance ceiling at 4K. The combo ranks in the 64th percentile of tested configurations for this title, indicating a system that is well above average for handling the game’s demanding physics and visuals.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo’s overall rank for Control performance?*

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 1339 out of 3720 tested combos, placing it in the 64th percentile of all configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500’s average benchmark score of 19593 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, which scores 19617 (a 0.1% difference), and the Intel Core i5-12500, which scores 19668 (a 0.4% difference). It is also within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-10700F.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the "High" preset delivers an average of 79 FPS, while the "Medium" preset achieves an average of 89 FPS. Both provide a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, but "High" offers better visual fidelity with a still-strong frame rate.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?*

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, the "Medium" preset achieves an average of 60 FPS, while the "High" preset drops to 54 FPS. The "Ultra" preset is not playable at this resolution, averaging only 47 FPS.

Q: What are the key specifications of the RTX 3070 Ti's memory subsystem?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. This high bandwidth is crucial for feeding the 6144 shading units at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 scores 2319 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 16429 points in multi-core. This indicates a strong single-thread capability, which is essential for game logic, while the 6-core/12-thread configuration provides substantial multi-threaded headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this configuration in a strong position for Control. With a rank of 1339 out of 3720 tested combos, the system performs better than roughly 64% of all tested setups. This is a significant achievement, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of gaming systems for this specific title. The ranking suggests that the pairing of the Ryzen 5 5500 and RTX 3070 Ti is well-balanced for Control's requirements, avoiding a significant bottleneck from either component.

This percentile ranking is a holistic measure that reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across the tested settings and resolutions. The system is clearly not at the top tier for 4K ultra settings, but its overall standing shows it is a very capable machine for high-refresh-rate 1080p and high-fidelity 1440p gaming. The data implies that users can expect a consistently smooth experience in most scenarios, with the primary performance limitations appearing only at the most demanding resolution and settings combinations. The rank reflects the RTX 3070 Ti's raw power, which is sufficient to leverage the Ryzen 5 5500's processing capabilities effectively.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the primary driver of frame rates in this configuration, especially at higher resolutions. Its specifications, including a boost clock of 1770 MHz and a base clock of 1575 MHz, are foundational to its performance. The GPU is built on the Ampere architecture and features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. This hardware configuration provides the raw compute throughput necessary to handle the complex rendering and particle effects present in Control.

The memory subsystem is a critical strength for this GPU. The 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. This is particularly important for Control at 4K, where the demand for texture data and frame buffer memory is immense. The data supports this: at 3840x2160, the average FPS drops significantly as settings increase, from 85 FPS on Low to 47 FPS on Ultra. This indicates that while the GPU's compute power is sufficient, the memory bandwidth and capacity are a limiting factor at the highest settings and resolutions. The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a substantial performance penalty, even on the High preset, which averages 79 FPS at 2560x1440 but only 54 FPS at 3840x2160.

The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and a Passmark G3D score of 23356, reflect its overall capabilities. Its percentile ranking of 75 places it above the majority of GPUs, and it trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, which it bests by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which outperforms it by 0.5%. This context shows that the RTX 3070 Ti is a high-end card that is well-suited for demanding titles like Control, but its 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint at the absolute highest settings in 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and frame rate. For a standard 60 FPS target at 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 79 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS and ensuring a smooth experience while maintaining high visual quality. The Medium preset offers a higher average of 89 FPS, which could be preferred for users with 144Hz monitors, but the visual fidelity reduction may not be worth the extra frames.

At 1920x1080, the High preset is the clear winner, achieving an average of 105 FPS. This makes it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a responsive gaming experience. While the Ultra preset at 1080p averages 91 FPS, which is still playable, the performance hit may not justify the marginal visual gains for most users. The Medium preset at 1080p provides a substantial boost to 118 FPS, but the High preset offers a better balance of fidelity and speed.

For 4K gaming, the options are more constrained. The Medium preset is the only setting that achieves a 60 FPS average, coming in at exactly 60 FPS. This should be considered the absolute minimum for a playable experience. The Low preset offers a higher average of 85 FPS but sacrifices significant visual quality. The High preset, at 54 FPS, is borderline and may be acceptable for some, but it is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The Ultra preset is not viable at 4K, with an average of just 47 FPS. Therefore, for a 4K experience, Medium settings are the most balanced choice.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across various resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system shows exceptional performance. The Low preset yields the highest average at 166 FPS. Moving up to Medium reduces the average to 118 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS. The High preset delivers an average of 105 FPS, which is a strong result for high-refresh-rate gaming. The Ultra preset, while still smooth, brings the average down to 91 FPS. This resolution shows a clear scaling pattern where the system has ample headroom to run the game at high settings.

At 2560x1440, performance remains very strong. The Low preset averages 126 FPS. The Medium preset achieves an average of 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS. The High preset delivers a solid 79 FPS average, making it a great choice for a 1440p 60Hz or 144Hz monitor. The Ultra preset provides a playable 69 FPS average, but this is the first point where the system begins to feel the strain of higher settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly, highlighting the GPU's limitations. The Low preset averages 85 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one to hit the 60 FPS target, averaging exactly 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. The High preset falls below 60 FPS, averaging 54 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, averaging only 47 FPS. This resolution demonstrates a steep performance cliff, indicating that 4K gaming is only viable with medium settings or lower.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 plays a crucial role in ensuring the GPU is fed with data, particularly at lower resolutions where the frame rate is high. This 6-core, 12-thread processor is based on the Zen 3 architecture and operates at a base clock of 3.60 GHz, boosting up to 4.20 GHz. The 16 MB of L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core help reduce memory latency, which is vital for game performance.

The CPU's benchmark scores show a balanced profile. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and single-core score of 2319 indicate that it can handle both the multi-threaded physics calculations and the single-threaded game logic that Control relies on. The 3DMark scores, such as 5411 for max threads and 836 for single thread, further confirm this balance. The Passmark single-thread score of 3058 is particularly relevant for gaming, as it ensures that the CPU is not a bottleneck in scenarios where the GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates, such as at 1080p Low settings, where the system averages 166 FPS.

The Ryzen 5 5500's performance is competitive with its nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 19593 is slightly lower than the Intel Core i5-12500 (19668) but higher than the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499). This indicates that the CPU is well-positioned to support the RTX 3070 Ti without holding it back. The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU provides sufficient processing power to keep up with the GPU's output, ensuring that the system's performance is primarily GPU-bound. The CPU's 65W TDP and 7nm process node also contribute to an efficient pairing, allowing the GPU to operate without power or thermal constraints from the processor.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4200 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1770 MHz MHz
TDP 290 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 85.0
3840x2160 Medium 60.0
3840x2160 High 54.0
3840x2160 Ultra 47.0
2560x1440 Low 126.0
2560x1440 Medium 89.0
2560x1440 High 79.0
2560x1440 Ultra 69.0
1920x1080 Low 166.0
1920x1080 Medium 118.0
1920x1080 High 105.0
1920x1080 Ultra 91.0

Control with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + RTX 3070 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.