Barony

The data for Barony shows a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions, with the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing delivering its strongest results at 1080p. The measured FPS values indicate a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rates at lower resolutions, while 4K presents a more demanding scenario that cuts frame rates significantly. This analysis examines the resolution scaling, the combo’s rank among tested configurations, the GPU and CPU roles, and the specific measured performance.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, revealing a clear shift in the bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 302 FPS, which drops to 191 FPS at 2560x1440 and further down to 100 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 66.9% reduction in frame rate from 1080p Low to 4K Low, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed as pixel count increases. The scaling pattern shows that the RTX 5050 has enough headroom at 1080p to push very high frame rates, but the workload becomes exponentially more demanding at higher resolutions.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU plays a more significant role in limiting performance, as the GPU is not fully saturated. For instance, at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 138, while at 1080p Low it is 302 FPS. The large gap between these settings indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences across presets, but the fact that even Low settings do not exceed 302 FPS suggests a ceiling imposed by the processor. This is consistent with the i5-10400F’s specifications, which include 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

At 4K, the situation reverses. The difference between Low (100 FPS) and Ultra (46 FPS) is a 54% drop, showing that the GPU is now the definitive limiting factor. The RTX 5050’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed to their limits, as the higher resolution demands more memory bandwidth and processing power. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, with High settings dropping from 122 FPS to 64 FPS, a 47.5% reduction. This indicates that the GPU is struggling to maintain performance as the pixel count increases, a common trait for mid-range cards at 4K.

The medium settings at each resolution provide a useful midpoint for analysis. At 1080p Medium, the average is 225 FPS with a minimum of 191 FPS and maximum of 258 FPS. At 1440p Medium, this drops to 142 FPS (min 120, max 163), and at 4K Medium, it falls to 74 FPS (min 63, max 85). The consistency of the min-to-max range at Medium settings suggests stable frame pacing, which is a positive indicator for gameplay smoothness. The scaling between resolutions at Medium settings shows a 36.9% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 47.9% drop from 1440p to 4K, highlighting the increasing GPU load.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1775 out of 2935 combos for Barony. This places it in the 60.5th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly 60% of all tested configurations but is outclassed by the top 40%. The rank suggests that while this is a competent setup for the game, it is not among the elite performers, which aligns with the mid-range positioning of both components.

The CPU’s individual percentile is 68, indicating it performs better relative to all CPUs than the combo does relative to all combos. The GPU’s percentile is 66, which is slightly lower than the CPU’s. This suggests that the graphics card is the more limiting factor in this pairing, as the combo rank (60.5th percentile) is lower than either component’s individual percentile. The data implies that the RTX 5050 is holding back the i5-10400F in Barony, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU workload is more intensive.

The combo’s rank of 1775 out of 2935 means there are 1160 combos that perform better in this game. This is a significant number, indicating that players seeking higher frame rates at 4K or more consistent Ultra settings would need to look at more powerful GPUs. However, for 1080p gaming, this combo’s performance is more than adequate, as the measured FPS values show it can handle even the most demanding presets with ease. The rank is a holistic measure across all resolutions and settings, so it reflects the combo’s versatility rather than its peak performance at any single configuration.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node. It features 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, which is a relatively high boost for a mid-range card. The memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is a key factor in the GPU’s performance, as it determines how quickly textures and frame data can be accessed.

In Barony, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. The 4K Ultra preset produces an average of 46 FPS, which is the lowest measured score in the dataset. This indicates that the 8 GB VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the demands of 4K with maximum settings. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS is a moderate figure, and the pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are consistent with its mid-range positioning.

Comparing the RTX 5050 to its nearest rivals in the database, it shows a deltaPct of -0.6 against the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, meaning it is 0.6% slower. Against the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, it is 1.6% slower. However, it is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT. These small deltas indicate that the RTX 5050 sits in a tightly contested performance tier, where minor architectural differences can shift rankings. The GPU’s percentile of 66 places it above average, but the measured FPS in Barony at 4K shows that it is not a high-end solution.

The GPU’s boost clock of 2572 MHz is a notable feature, as it allows for higher sustained performance under load. This is reflected in the 1080p Low result of 302 FPS, which suggests the GPU can output frames quickly when not bottlenecked by the CPU. However, the memory bandwidth becomes a constraint at 4K, as the 128-bit bus width limits the data transfer rate. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is also a potential issue for future titles, but for Barony, it is sufficient for all presets at 1080p and 1440p, with the 4K Ultra setting being the only one that struggles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers excellent performance across all settings. The Low preset averages 302 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce an average of 225 FPS with a minimum of 191 FPS and maximum of 258 FPS, showing good frame consistency. High settings average 193 FPS, and Ultra drops to 138 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 164 FPS, a 54.3% reduction, indicating that the GPU is heavily utilized when maxing out settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings average 191 FPS, which is still very high for 1440p. Medium settings average 142 FPS with a range of 120 to 163 FPS, providing a smooth experience. High settings drop to 122 FPS, and Ultra falls to 87 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at each setting is consistent: Low drops by 36.8%, Medium by 36.9%, High by 36.8%, and Ultra by 37.0%. This uniform scaling suggests that the GPU is the primary factor, with no CPU bottleneck emerging at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. Low settings produce an average of 100 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high refresh rate monitors. Medium settings average 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS, which is still acceptable for most users. High settings drop to 64 FPS, and Ultra falls to 46 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper than from 1080p to 1440p: Low drops by 47.6%, Medium by 47.9%, High by 47.5%, and Ultra by 47.1%. This indicates that the GPU is working beyond its optimal range at 4K, with the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity becoming limiting factors.

The Medium settings at each resolution provide the most complete data, with min and max FPS recorded. At 1080p, the range is 191 to 258 FPS, a spread of 67 FPS. At 1440p, the range is 120 to 163 FPS, a spread of 43 FPS. At 4K, the range is 63 to 85 FPS, a spread of 22 FPS. The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU is more consistently loaded, with less variation in frame times. This is a positive sign for stability, even if the absolute FPS values are lower.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Comet Lake architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. It has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a moderate amount for a mid-range processor.

In Barony, the CPU’s role is most apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 302 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s limit for this game. The single-thread performance, as measured by the 3dmark single-thread score of 688 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1451, is competent but not exceptional. The multi-thread performance is stronger, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10283 and a Passmark multithread score of 12115. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle games that utilize multiple cores, but Barony may not be heavily threaded.

The CPU’s percentile of 68 places it above the 68th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 68% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E (0.2% faster), AMD EPYC 7552 (0.5% faster), and AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.6% slower). These small deltas show that the i5-10400F is in a competitive mid-range tier, with its 6 cores and 12 threads providing a balance between single and multi-threaded performance.

In the context of Barony, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The consistent scaling from 1440p to 4K suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the FPS drops proportionally with the increase in pixel count. However, at 1080p Low, the 302 FPS result may be constrained by the CPU’s single-thread performance, as the GPU could potentially output more frames if not limited. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.30 GHz is respectable, but the older 14 nm process and Comet Lake architecture are not as efficient as newer designs.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS?

A: At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the combo averages 191 FPS, and at 1920x1080 with High settings, it averages 193 FPS. For 4K, only Low settings achieve over 100 FPS, with an average of 100 FPS.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The 4K Ultra preset produces an average of 46 FPS, which is the lowest measured score. This is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider playable, indicating that the GPU is not sufficient for maximum settings at 4K.

Q: What is the comboRankInGame and what does it mean?

A: The combo ranks 1775 out of 2935 tested combinations. This places it in the 60.5th percentile, meaning it outperforms approximately 60% of all tested configurations for Barony, but is outclassed by the top 40%.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 302 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s limit. The CPU’s single-thread score of 688 in 3dmark suggests it may cap performance, as the GPU could potentially output more frames.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the bandwidth and capacity become limiting factors, particularly at Ultra settings where the average FPS drops to 46.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, based on the deltaPct of 1.6. This indicates a very close performance level between the two GPUs in the database’s average benchmark scores.

Settings Recommendations

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is viable, with an average of 138 FPS. The High preset offers a better balance, averaging 193 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate that many monitors support. For users seeking maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 302 FPS is the best choice, though it sacrifices visual quality. The Medium preset at 225 FPS provides a good middle ground, with a minimum of 191 FPS ensuring consistent performance.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is recommended, as it averages 122 FPS, which is smooth for most displays. The Medium preset at 142 FPS is also excellent, with a maximum of 163 FPS. Ultra at 87 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action. Low at 191 FPS is overkill for most monitors, making Medium or High the better choices for a balance of quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best option, averaging 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS. This ensures that the frame rate stays above 60 FPS for the majority of the time. The Low preset at 100 FPS is also viable for competitive play, but the visual fidelity is significantly reduced. High at 64 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 46 FPS is not recommended for a smooth experience. For 4K gaming, Medium settings provide the best balance between visual quality and playable frame rates.

The data indicates that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates across all settings. For 4K, users should stick to Medium or Low presets to maintain playable performance. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions, so reducing texture quality and other VRAM-intensive settings will help maintain stability.