Archeage

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers a playable Archeage experience, but the data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at high resolutions. At 1080p, the combination is capable of excellent frame rates exceeding 140 FPS on Low settings, yet it struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K on High settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and optimal settings based strictly on the benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. Its base clock is 2.10 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it features 33 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, scoring 35,443 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 41,765 in Passmark multithread. Its single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,003 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,261.

For Archeage, an MMORPG from 2014, the CPU's substantial core count is less critical than its high boost clock and single-thread performance. The game's engine typically relies on fewer, faster cores for main game logic and physics. With a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a Passmark physics score of 2,495, this processor provides ample headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions. The data supports this: at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 143 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU rapidly. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 54,097 is only 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, indicating it is a top-tier performer that should not limit frame rates in most scenarios. The processor's 65 W TDP and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory further solidify its role as a capable foundation for this GPU pairing.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the limiting factor in this pairing. Based on the Turing architecture and built on a 12 nm process, it has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. Its compute capabilities include 2,560 shading units and a FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS. In DirectX benchmarks, the card scores 67 in Passmark DirectX 12 and 151 in DirectX 11, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs.

In the context of Archeage, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for the game's textures, but the GPU's raw compute power is what determines performance. The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is stressed as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 21, a stark contrast to the 1080p Low result of 143 FPS. The GPU's average benchmark score of 22,206 is only 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A400 and 0.9% higher than the GTX TITAN Z, showing it is a mid-range performer. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 9.062 TFLOPS are the key specifications that dictate how well it handles the increasing pixel counts at higher resolutions, and the data confirms that it falls behind the CPU's capabilities in this game.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 1027 out of 1727 tested combos for Archeage. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum, indicating that while it is not a top-tier setup for this title, it is also far from the worst. The rank is a holistic measure that considers all tested resolution and settings combinations, and it suggests that the GPU holds the combo back from higher positions.

Relative to the GPU's benchmark percentile of 65, the combo's rank in the 40th percentile (1027/1727) is notably lower. This discrepancy highlights the game's specific demands; Archeage appears to be more demanding on the GPU than average synthetic benchmarks suggest. The CPU, being in the 94th percentile, is not the limiting factor. The data indicates that if the GPU were swapped for a stronger model, the combo's rank would improve substantially. Conversely, the CPU's high performance ensures that the GPU is always the primary constraint, making this a balanced but GPU-limited pairing for this specific MMORPG.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs admirably. Low settings yield an average of 143 FPS, Medium delivers 128.9 FPS, and High achieves 87.6 FPS. Ultra settings, however, cause a significant drop to 56.8 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU can maintain high frame rates, but the jump from High to Ultra is steep, with a 35% performance penalty.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings average 97.2 FPS, Medium hits 87.5 FPS, and High drops to 56.6 FPS. Ultra falls to 42 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p on High settings results in a 35% FPS reduction (from 87.6 to 56.6), indicating the GPU is becoming more stressed.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU is clearly overwhelmed. High settings average just 36.1 FPS, Medium is at 49.9 FPS, and Low dips to 56.1 FPS. Ultra is virtually unplayable at 21 FPS. The data shows that even Low settings at 4K cannot reach 60 FPS, confirming that this resolution is beyond the RTX 2070 SUPER's comfort zone for this game.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling across resolutions tells a definitive story about the limiting component. From 1080p Low (143 FPS) to 1440p Low (97.2 FPS), there is a 32% drop. From 1440p Low to 4K Low (56.1 FPS), there is another 42% drop. On High settings, the decline is equally steep: from 87.6 FPS at 1080p to 56.6 FPS at 1440p (a 35% drop), and then to 36.1 FPS at 4K (a 36% drop from 1440p).

This pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The FPS decreases consistently with pixel count, which directly correlates with the GPU's fill rate and shader workload. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat as resolution increases, because the CPU workload would not change. Instead, the data shows a linear degradation that tracks the GPU's workload. The 4K Ultra result of 21 FPS is particularly telling; it represents a 63% drop from the 1080p Ultra result of 56.8 FPS, further emphasizing that the RTX 2070 SUPER's compute resources (9.062 TFLOPS) are insufficient for such high pixel densities in Archeage. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are also likely strained at 4K, but the compute scaling is the dominant factor.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of 60 FPS at 1080p with high settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 87.6, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this setup to maintain a smooth experience?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the best choice. All settings except Ultra (56.8 FPS) achieve above 87 FPS, making it the sweet spot for this combo.

Q: Can this hardware handle 4K gaming in Archeage?

A: No, the data indicates it cannot maintain playable frame rates at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS at 4K is 56.1 on Low settings, and High settings only reach 36.1 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main performance limit here?

A: The benchmark data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting component. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU bottlenecking, while the CPU's high benchmark scores (94th percentile) suggest it has ample headroom.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its immediate rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 22,206, which is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A400 and 2.3% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. It is 0.9% higher than the GTX TITAN Z.

Q: What is the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 97.2 FPS, while Ultra settings average 42 FPS, representing a significant 57% performance drop for the highest visual quality.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's priority for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For the smoothest experience, Low settings at 1920x1080 are the clear winner, delivering an average of 143 FPS. This is ideal for competitive play or for users who prioritize responsiveness above all else.

For a balanced approach that maintains high frame rates while improving visuals, Medium settings at 1920x1080 is the best choice, yielding 128.9 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over Low with only a 10% performance penalty. At 1440p, Medium settings also offers a solid experience at 87.5 FPS, making it a viable option for users with 1440p monitors who do not require the highest detail.

The High settings preset at 1080p (87.6 FPS) is also playable and provides a good visual quality boost. However, the jump to Ultra settings at any resolution is not recommended. At 1080p Ultra, the FPS drops to 56.8, and at 1440p it falls to 42 FPS. The data shows that Ultra settings incur a disproportionate performance cost for this hardware, making it the least efficient preset. For users with 4K displays, the data suggests avoiding this resolution entirely, as even Low settings only achieve 56.1 FPS. The most stable and enjoyable experience is firmly in the 1080p resolution with Medium or High settings.