Archeage

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a solid, high-refresh-rate experience in Archeage, though it falls short of the absolute top tier. This combination ranks 536th out of 1727 tested combos, placing it in the upper 31st percentile of all system configurations. The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU handles the load well at mainstream resolutions, but the game’s engine and Ultra preset create significant bottlenecks at higher settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Archeage?

A: The combo ranks 536th out of 1727 tested configurations. This places it in the upper third of all systems, indicating capable performance but not top-tier status.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49367, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166) and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (49062). It trails the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.5%.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 among all GPUs?

A: The RX 9070 sits in the 79th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score of 34780. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA A2, scores 34866, which is 0.2% higher.

Q: What is the best measured average frame rate for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 197.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Is there a significant performance drop between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes. The average frame rate falls from 134.6 FPS at Low to 57.7 FPS at Ultra at 2560x1440, representing a substantial 57% reduction in performance.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the processor in this combo?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has a launch MSRP of $294.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 536 out of 1727 tested configurations places it in the 69th percentile of all tested systems. This is a strong showing, indicating that the i5-14600KF and RX 9070 combination is well-suited for Archeage. The data suggests that this pairing is significantly more powerful than the average tested system, making it a reliable choice for smooth gameplay.

However, the rank also reveals that there are 535 configurations that perform better. These higher-ranking systems likely feature more powerful GPUs or CPUs that can better handle the game’s demanding Ultra preset. The measured frame rates confirm this, as the combo struggles to maintain high averages at 4K Ultra (33.7 FPS) and even at 1440p Ultra (57.7 FPS). The processor’s strong multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32889, is not the limiting factor; the GPU and game optimization are the primary constraints at higher settings. This rank suggests a balanced system that excels at moderate settings and resolutions, but it is not a top-tier contender for maximum visual fidelity.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the primary driver of frame rates in this configuration. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for Archeage at all tested resolutions, even at 4K Ultra, where the game’s texture and asset loading demands are highest.

The GPU’s clock speeds are notable: a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The game clock is particularly relevant for sustained gaming performance. The data shows that the GPU’s capabilities are best utilized at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU delivers an average of 197.3 FPS on Low settings, indicating it is not the bottleneck. However, at 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops to 45.2 FPS on High, showing the GPU is working much harder. The RT cores and shading units, while not directly measured in this game, contribute to the overall rendering capability. The GPU’s performance percentile of 79 places it above the majority of other graphics cards, but its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA A2, are within a 0.2% margin, suggesting that performance headroom is limited when compared to the top 20% of GPUs.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience balances visual quality with frame rate stability. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset is the clear choice. At 1920x1080, it delivers 197.3 FPS, and at 2560x1440, it maintains 134.6 FPS. These frame rates are well above the threshold for smooth gameplay and provide significant headroom for demanding scenes.

For a more visually rich experience, the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It offers a substantial improvement in graphical fidelity over Low while still maintaining high performance. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate is 175.1 FPS, and at 2560x1440, it is 120.6 FPS. This preset provides a good balance for most users. The High preset is also viable, but the performance cost is noticeable. At 2560x1440, it drops to 80.8 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 45.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended for this combo, as the performance penalty is severe. At 1440p, it only achieves 57.7 FPS, and at 4K, it drops to 33.7 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. The data indicates that Medium is the optimal setting for this combination, providing excellent performance and a meaningful visual upgrade.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers excellent performance across all settings. The Low preset yields the highest average frame rate at 197.3 FPS. Medium follows closely with 175.1 FPS, while High drops to 123.1 FPS. The Ultra preset is significantly more demanding, with an average of 84 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 113.3 FPS, indicating a steep performance curve.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings produce an average of 134.6 FPS, which is still very high. Medium maintains a solid 120.6 FPS, while High falls to 80.8 FPS. Ultra is the most demanding, with an average of 57.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 76.9 FPS. This resolution is well-handled by the RX 9070, with even High settings providing a playable experience.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed to its limits. Low settings still achieve a respectable 77.2 FPS, making it the only playable option at this resolution. Medium drops to 68.7 FPS, which is borderline. High falls further to 45.2 FPS, and Ultra is the worst performer at 33.7 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable with Low settings on this combo. The performance degradation from Low to Ultra is a steep 43.5 FPS, highlighting the extreme demands of the Ultra preset at this resolution. The overall trend indicates that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can consistently deliver high frame rates.