Archeage

Archeage, a 2014 MMORPG, remains a demanding title for modern hardware, particularly when pushing higher resolutions and detail settings. The combination of the Intel Core i5-14600K and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT offers a specific performance profile that is heavily influenced by the game's age and its reliance on both CPU and GPU resources. This analysis breaks down the measured performance of this pairing across various resolutions and settings, using only the data available from benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of the Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination in Archeage?

A: According to the data, this specific combo ranks 960th out of 1727 tested combinations in the game. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the tested pairings, indicating that while it can play the game, many other hardware configurations deliver higher frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 49166. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 49062, which is a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i5-14600KF is also close with a score of 49367, making it 0.4% faster than the 14600K in this metric. The AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.9% ahead, and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 1% behind.

Q: What is the best measured performance for this combo at 1920x1080 resolution?

A: The highest average frame rate achieved at 1920x1080 was 154.4 FPS on the "Low" settings preset. The "Medium" preset delivered 137.7 FPS, while "High" settings resulted in a 96.2 FPS average. The most demanding "Ultra" preset still produced a playable 63.6 FPS average.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score position it against the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721. The AMD Radeon RX 6800, its nearest rival, has an average score of 33493. This means the RX 6700 XT is 0.7% ahead of the RX 6800 in this particular aggregate benchmark.

Q: Does the combo achieve a 60 FPS average at 3840x2160 resolution on any settings?

A: Yes, at 4K resolution (3840x2160), the combo achieves a 61.9 FPS average on the "Low" settings preset. However, on "Medium" settings, the average drops to 51.3 FPS, and on "High" it falls to 36 FPS. The "Ultra" preset yields only a 25.8 FPS average.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the Intel Core i5-14600K?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core processor with 20 threads. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and it is based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. Its performance in Archeage shows a clear dependency on resolution and settings. The GPU's role becomes more critical as the resolution increases, but the game's engine also shows significant sensitivity to the settings preset. The data shows a massive difference between the "Low" and "Ultra" presets at every resolution. For instance, at 1920x1080, the average frame rate goes from 154.4 FPS on "Low" to 63.6 FPS on "Ultra," demonstrating the heavy load that higher graphical fidelity places on the GPU. This pattern is consistent at higher resolutions, with the "Ultra" preset at 2560x1440 averaging 40.8 FPS and at 3840x2160 dropping to a 25.8 FPS average.

The GPU's performance at 4K resolution highlights its limitations in this title. While it can push past the 60 FPS mark on "Low" settings with a 61.9 FPS average, the "High" and "Ultra" presets at 3840x2160 produce averages of 36 and 25.8 FPS, respectively. This indicates that the RX 6700 XT, while a capable card, is not sufficient for high-detail 4K gaming in Archeage. Its benchmark scores support this positioning. It has a percentile rank of 77 among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 33721. This places it in the upper-middle tier, with its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, being 0.7% slower in aggregate score. The data indicates a GPU that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates at the most demanding settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600K, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, serves as a strong foundation for gaming. Its high boost clock of 5.30 GHz is particularly relevant for an MMORPG like Archeage, which often has single-threaded performance bottlenecks. The processor's performance is robust, as indicated by its 93rd percentile rank among all CPUs. The CPU's average benchmark score of 49166 places it in a tight competitive group. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, is only 0.2% behind, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.4% ahead. This suggests that the 14600K is a well-balanced performer. While the CPU's role is less visible in the measured FPS data than the GPU's, its capabilities ensure that it is not a limiting factor in most scenarios. The data shows that the combination's rank of 960 out of 1727 is influenced by the GPU's performance at higher settings, but the CPU's strong scores suggest it provides a solid platform.

The interaction between the CPU and GPU is evident when examining the frame rates. At 1920x1080, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in some scenarios, but the data shows the GPU still has a significant impact. For example, at 1080p, the difference between "Low" and "Ultra" settings is 90.8 FPS (from 154.4 to 63.6), which is a massive drop. This indicates that the game's visual effects are heavily dependent on GPU processing. However, the CPU's ability to handle the game's logic and draw calls is crucial. The i5-14600K's high single-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4642, should help maintain consistent frame rates in less demanding scenes. The CPU's specifications, including a 24 MB shared L3 cache, are well-suited for a modern gaming workload.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Archeage, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 960th out of 1727. This rank places it just past the midpoint of all tested combos, meaning there are 767 configurations that perform worse and 959 that perform better. The rank is a holistic measure that considers the combined performance of the CPU and GPU. Given that the GPU has a 77th percentile ranking and the CPU has a 93rd percentile ranking, the combo's overall rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's performance in the most demanding settings. The CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU, while solid, is not in the same class. This is reflected in the measured frame rates, where the combo excels at lower resolutions but falls behind at 4K Ultra settings.

The performance gap between this combo and higher-ranked ones is likely significant, as the rank of 960 suggests a mid-pack finish. The data shows that the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which is 0.7% slower in aggregate benchmark score. This indicates that the RX 6700 XT is a strong performer in its class. However, for a game like Archeage, the combination's rank is a clear indicator that it is a mid-range solution. The CPU's performance is not the issue, as its average benchmark score is within 1% of its nearest rivals. Instead, the GPU's limitations at higher settings are what define this combo's overall standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo's performance scaling across resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. On the "Low" preset, it achieves an average of 154.4 FPS. Moving to "Medium" drops the average to 137.7 FPS, a decrease of 16.7 FPS. The "High" preset results in a 96.2 FPS average, which is a significant 41.5 FPS drop from "Medium". The "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, yielding a 63.6 FPS average. This shows that while the combo can handle 1080p gaming with ease on lower settings, even the "Ultra" preset remains playable.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The "Low" preset produces a 102.8 FPS average, which is still very smooth. The "Medium" preset delivers a 94.5 FPS average, a smaller drop of 8.3 FPS compared to the previous resolution's gap. The "High" preset averages 60.6 FPS, which is right at the threshold for smooth gameplay. The "Ultra" preset drops significantly to a 40.8 FPS average, which may be considered less fluid for some users. This resolution shows a clear trade-off between visual quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. The "Low" preset is the only one that provides a consistently playable experience, with a 61.9 FPS average. The "Medium" preset drops to a 51.3 FPS average, which is still playable but less smooth. The "High" preset averages 36 FPS, which is a noticeable step down. The "Ultra" preset is the worst performer, with a 25.8 FPS average, making it not suitable for smooth gameplay. The data shows a consistent pattern: the frame rate penalty for increasing settings is more severe at higher resolutions. For example, moving from "Low" to "Ultra" at 1080p costs 90.8 FPS, while at 4K it costs 36.1 FPS. This is because the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, and the absolute difference in frame rates becomes smaller.