Archeage

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a compelling, if nuanced, performance profile in Archeage. The data indicates a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions and settings, while at 1080p Low, the CPU’s capabilities become the defining factor. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizing them within the broader benchmark database.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The processor has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel interface. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18760 and a Geekbench multicore score of 15371. Single-thread performance is also robust, as evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2525 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4063.

In the context of Archeage, an MMORPG that often relies on single-thread performance for game logic and world simulation, the Ryzen 7 7700’s high boost clock and solid single-core scores are critical. At 1080p with Low settings, the measured average FPS of 269 suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding frames to the GPU at a very high rate. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2043 indicate that the processor can handle lightly-threaded workloads efficiently, which is typical for this genre. However, the data also shows that as resolution and settings increase, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU’s headroom is less utilized. The 16 threads ensure that background tasks and the game’s auxiliary processes do not cause stuttering, a common requirement for smooth MMORPG experiences in crowded areas. While the CPU is not the limiting factor in most tested scenarios, its performance ceiling is what allows the system to reach the exceptionally high frame rates seen at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 203 out of 3708 tested combinations in Archeage. This places it in the top 5.5% of all tested systems, indicating a very high level of overall performance. This ranking is not surprising given the capabilities of both components. The CPU itself sits at the 87th percentile when compared to all other CPUs in the benchmark database, while the GPU is at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The high combo rank suggests that this pairing is well-balanced for this specific game, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other in the majority of settings tested.

When examining the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 7700’s average benchmark score of 40081 is remarkably close to its competitors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048 (a delta of 0.1%), the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246 (a delta of -0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313 (a delta of -0.6%). These sub-1% differences highlight that the Ryzen 7 7700’s raw processing power is essentially on par with these other options. Similarly, the RTX 4080’s average score of 54247 is nearly identical to the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54209 (a delta of 0.1%). The differences are minor compared to other GPUs like the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (-1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (-2.6%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S (-2.7%). The combo’s high rank, however, is a result of the synergy between these two components, not just their individual scores, and it demonstrates that this is a top-tier configuration for Archeage.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a classic scaling pattern that clearly illustrates the shift in bottleneck between the CPU and GPU as resolution increases. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-limited, especially at lower settings. For example, at Low settings, the average FPS is 269. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 181 FPS, a significant 32.7% decrease. At 4K Low, the average FPS falls further to 104, which is a 42.5% decrease from the 1440p figure. This dramatic drop when the GPU workload increases indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is holding the system back, and the GPU has spare capacity. The GPU is not being fully utilized at 1080p Low, so increasing the resolution to 1440p and then 4K allows the GPU to work harder, but the frame rate still drops because the total work per frame increases.

At higher settings, the pattern changes. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 163 at 1080p to 110 at 1440p (a 32.5% decrease) and then to 63 at 4K (a 42.7% decrease from 1440p). The percentage drops are very similar to those seen at Low settings, but the absolute FPS values are lower. This suggests that while the GPU is becoming more of a factor, the CPU is still a significant contributor to the performance ceiling. The most telling data comes from the Ultra settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 111. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 75 (a 32.4% decrease), and at 4K Ultra, it plummets to 43 (a 42.7% decrease from 1440p). The consistent ~32% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~42% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings is a strong indicator that the scaling is primarily due to the GPU’s rendering workload. The fact that the relative drops are nearly identical regardless of settings suggests that the CPU is not the primary limiter in these higher-resolution scenarios; instead, the RTX 4080’s pixel-pushing capabilities are the deciding factor. The system is well-balanced, but the data clearly shows that the GPU is the performance bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU is more of a constraint at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following breakdown uses the exact measured average FPS values from the FACT PACK to detail performance across all tested configurations.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: The average FPS is 269.
• Medium: The average FPS is 240, with a minimum of 204 and a maximum of 276.
• High: The average FPS is 163.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 111.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: The average FPS is 181.
• Medium: The average FPS is 161, with a minimum of 137 and a maximum of 186.
• High: The average FPS is 110.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 75.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: The average FPS is 104.
• Medium: The average FPS is 92, with a minimum of 79 and a maximum of 106.
• High: The average FPS is 63.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 43.

The data shows a clear hierarchy. At 1080p, the system is capable of very high frame rates, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 100 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p shows a tight range between 204 and 276 FPS, indicating consistent performance. At 1440p, the system remains highly playable, with the High preset hitting 110 FPS and the Ultra preset still managing a solid 75 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p has a range of 137 to 186 FPS, which is still smooth. At 4K, the system starts to show its limits. The High preset averages 63 FPS, which is just at the edge of smoothness for many users, while the Ultra preset drops to 43 FPS, which may be less desirable for fast-paced gameplay. The 4K Medium preset, with an average of 92 FPS and a range of 79 to 106 FPS, appears to be the sweet spot for 4K gaming on this hardware, providing a good balance between visual quality and frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS recorded at 1080p is 269, which is achieved with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming at high refresh rates?

A: The data shows that at 4K with High settings, the average FPS is 63. This is not enough for high refresh rate monitors (e.g., 144Hz), but it is sufficient for 60Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 43 FPS.

Q: How does the performance scale when moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 110 at 1440p to 63 at 4K. This represents a performance reduction of approximately 42.7%.

Q: Which settings preset provides the most consistent frame times at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p provides a frame rate range of 137 to 186 FPS, with an average of 161 FPS. This suggests a relatively stable experience, though the data does not include frame time variance.

Q: What is the rank of this specific CPU and GPU combo in the database for Archeage?

A: This combination is ranked 203 out of 3708 tested combinations, placing it in the top 5.5% of all tested systems.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this system?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 43, which occurs at 4K resolution with the Ultra settings preset.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For users with a 1080p high-refresh-rate monitor (e.g., 165Hz or 240Hz), the High preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 163 FPS. This provides a significant visual improvement over Low while still maintaining a frame rate that can keep up with most high-refresh displays. The Ultra preset at 1080p also performs well at 111 FPS, offering the best visual fidelity for those who prioritize image quality over maximizing the refresh rate. The Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 240 FPS, is an excellent choice for competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount, though the visual difference between Medium and High is often notable.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended starting point, achieving an average of 110 FPS. This is ideal for 100Hz to 120Hz displays and provides a good balance of quality and performance. The Medium preset at 1440p, averaging 161 FPS, is a strong alternative for users with 165Hz monitors who want to ensure they consistently hit high frame rates. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with an average of 75 FPS, is viable for users with 60Hz to 75Hz displays who want the best possible visuals. For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation, as it is the only preset that breaks the 90 FPS barrier (averaging 92 FPS). The High preset at 4K, averaging 63 FPS, is acceptable for a standard 60Hz monitor, but the drop to Medium provides a much smoother experience with a relatively minor loss in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 4K should be avoided for gameplay, as the 43 FPS average is below the threshold for smooth motion in most scenarios. Ultimately, the data suggests that the system is most balanced at 1440p, where it can handle all presets with playable frame rates.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a high-end graphics card based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features the AD103 chip with 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The card has a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The RTX 4080 also includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. Its benchmark scores reflect its position as a top-tier GPU, with a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739. It sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247, placing it in a virtual tie with the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209, delta 0.1%).

The GPU’s role in Archeage becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases. The data shows that at 4K, the RTX 4080 is the primary factor limiting performance. The significant drop in FPS from 1440p to 4K, regardless of settings, is a direct result of the GPU’s rendering workload. The 16 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, even at 4K Ultra, and is unlikely to be a bottleneck. The high boost clock of 2505 MHz and the substantial FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS are key contributors to the card’s ability to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. The card’s memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and data transfer are not limiting factors. In contrast to the CPU, which shows its limits at 1080p, the RTX 4080’s performance ceiling is only reached when the resolution is pushed to 4K with high settings. The measured results indicate that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU has ample headroom, and the system’s performance is often constrained by the CPU. This is a classic sign of a well-paired, high-end system where the balance shifts from CPU-bound at lower resolutions to GPU-bound at higher resolutions.