Archeage
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 77 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 36 | 53 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 63 | 92 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 64 | 93 | 137 | 154 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a playable, though not consistently smooth, experience in Archeage, with performance heavily dictated by the graphics preset rather than resolution. The data indicates a system that handles the game’s engine capably at lower settings, but struggles to maintain high frame rates when visual fidelity is maximized. This analysis breaks down the measured results across resolutions and settings, examining the roles of the CPU and GPU, and providing actionable recommendations based solely on the observed frame rates.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic pattern of GPU-bound performance, particularly at higher settings. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 154 FPS at 1920x1080 to 104 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 59 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 32% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 43% reduction from 1440p to 4K, showing that the GPU's rendering workload increases substantially with pixel count.
At Medium settings, the scaling is similar but with slightly lower absolute numbers: 137 FPS at 1080p, 92 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 33% and 42% respectively, indicating a consistent relationship between resolution and performance that is independent of the preset. This consistency suggests that the RX 6700 XT's rendering pipeline is the primary limiter, as the CPU is able to feed frames adequately across all tested resolutions.
The High preset shows a more pronounced drop at 4K, falling to 36 FPS from 63 FPS at 1440p, a 43% reduction. This steeper decline at the highest pixel count, coupled with the Ultra preset's 25 FPS at 4K, points to the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading capacity being saturated when both resolution and graphical complexity are high. The data shows that the limiting component is clearly the GPU, as the CPU's performance headroom is not exhausted until frame rates reach very high levels, which only happens at 1080p with lower settings.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, with its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, provides a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This memory configuration appears sufficient for the texture loads at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results suggest it becomes a bottleneck at higher settings. The GPU’s base clock of 2321 MHz and boost clock of 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz, are the driving forces behind the pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant factor in this pairing. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate of 25 FPS is barely playable, and the 4K High setting at 36 FPS is not much better. This is a clear indication that the RX 6700 XT’s compute units, 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, are overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum visual effects. The GPU's percentile ranking of 72 vs all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27425, places it in the upper mid-range, but Archeage's engine appears to be particularly demanding at 4K.
The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is telling. It scores essentially identically to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta) and is only 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in average benchmark score. This suggests that in synthetic tests, the RX 6700 XT is competitive with those cards, but the in-game measurements here show that it cannot maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, which is a common limitation for cards in this performance tier.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600, with 6 cores and 12 threads, has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This Zen 4 architecture processor provides a strong single-threaded foundation, as evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 999 and cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1852. This is crucial for an MMORPG like Archeage, where game logic and network handling often rely on a few heavily loaded threads.
The CPU’s role in the measured frame rates appears to be secondary to the GPU. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 154 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU could become a limiting factor, but the scaling to 1440p and 4K shows that the GPU is the first bottleneck. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 12735 and a passmark_multithread score of 27058, is more than adequate to feed the GPU at most settings.
The data shows that the CPU is not the constraining component in this configuration. Even at 1080p Ultra, where the GPU is heavily loaded, the frame rate of 64 FPS is likely CPU-bound, but the CPU's 78th percentile ranking vs all CPUs indicates it has ample headroom. The nearest rivals in CPU performance, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and Intel Core i9-11900KF, are within 0.4% of the 7600's average benchmark score of 26324, suggesting that swapping to those processors would yield negligible gains in Archeage. The CPU's job is to maintain minimum frame times, and the data indicates it does so effectively, allowing the GPU to be the sole determinant of performance across the tested settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of the system's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the results are strong: Low averages 154 FPS, Medium averages 137 FPS (with a min of 117 and max of 158), and High averages 93 FPS. The Ultra preset is the outlier, dropping to 64 FPS, which is a significant 31% reduction from High, indicating a heavy performance cost for the highest quality settings.
At 2560x1440, the pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low averages 104 FPS, Medium averages 92 FPS (min 79, max 106), and High averages 63 FPS. Ultra drops to 43 FPS, which is a 32% reduction from High. This shows that the Ultra preset is consistently the most demanding, and the gap between High and Ultra widens as resolution increases.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles with higher settings. Low averages 59 FPS, which is playable, and Medium averages 53 FPS (min 45, max 61), which is borderline. High drops to 36 FPS, and Ultra becomes nearly unplayable at 25 FPS. The data shows that only Low and Medium settings are viable at 4K, and even Medium has a minimum frame rate that could cause stuttering in crowded areas. The 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS confirms that the GPU is not capable of handling maximum settings at this resolution.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of 60 FPS at 1080p with High settings?
A: No. The measured average frame rate for 1920x1080 High is 93 FPS, which is well above 60 FPS. The system easily maintains 60 FPS at this resolution and setting.
Q: What is the best resolution for Ultra settings?
A: The data shows that Ultra settings are only playable at 1920x1080, where the average frame rate is 64 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra drops to 43 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 25 FPS.
Q: Can this system run the game at 4K?
A: Yes, but only at Low and Medium settings, which average 59 FPS and 53 FPS respectively. High and Ultra settings are not recommended, as they average 36 FPS and 25 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. The differences are minimal.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 27425, which is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta), and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. It is 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Medium and High at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Medium averages 92 FPS, while High averages 63 FPS. This represents a 29 FPS difference, or a 32% reduction in performance when moving from Medium to High.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend on the user's target resolution and preference for smoothness versus visual quality. For 1080p, the High preset is the best balance, delivering an average of 93 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides good visual fidelity. The Ultra preset is also viable at 64 FPS, but the 31% drop from High suggests that the visual improvements may not justify the performance cost for all users.
At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, with an average of 92 FPS and a minimum of 79 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with good detail. The High preset at 63 FPS is playable, but the minimum frame rate is not reported, making it a riskier choice for maintaining consistent performance. Ultra at 43 FPS is not recommended for competitive or smooth play.
At 4K, the data is clear: only Low and Medium presets are recommended. Low averages 59 FPS, which is just below the ideal 60 FPS target, while Medium averages 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS. High at 36 FPS and Ultra at 25 FPS are too low for a comfortable experience. For the best experience at this resolution, Medium is the highest preset that maintains playable frame rates, and users may need to accept lower visual settings to achieve consistent performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination ranks 1950 out of 3708 tested combos in Archeage. This places it in the 47th percentile, meaning that it performs better than roughly half of all tested systems, but worse than the other half. This ranking is consistent with the measured frame rates, which show strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, but weakness at 4K with high settings.
The combo's ranking is likely held back by the GPU's performance at 4K, as the CPU is a strong performer in its own right. The data shows that the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates at medium-to-high settings. However, for users seeking maximum visual fidelity at 4K, this combination is not sufficient, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The ranking of 1950 out of 3708 suggests that there are many other combinations that can outperform it, particularly those with more powerful GPUs that can handle 4K Ultra settings. For the target resolutions of 1080p and 1440p, this combo is a solid choice, but it does not excel at the highest resolution tier.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 104.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 154.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 64.0 |
Archeage with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.