Archeage
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 67 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 31 | 46 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 37 | 54 | 80 | 90 |
| 1080p Full HD | 55 | 81 | 119 | 134 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers a highly playable Archeage experience at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K Ultra settings prove too demanding for this combination. The data shows a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance keeps frame rates stable at lower resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across three resolutions and four settings presets, contextualizes the combo’s overall rank, and examines the individual roles of the processor and graphics card.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a sharp decline in performance as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, indicating that the Radeon RX 6650 XT is the limiting component at higher pixel counts. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 81 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 27 FPS, and then further down to 31 FPS at 4K, representing a 50 FPS total loss from the baseline. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the rendering workload grows exponentially with pixel count, and the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus of the RX 6650 XT begin to strain under 4K loads.
The Low settings preset shows a similar trend but with higher absolute numbers: 134 FPS at 1080p, 90 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is approximately 61%, which is less severe than the 62% drop seen at High settings, suggesting that the GPU still has headroom at lower graphical loads but remains the dominant constraint. Medium settings follow the same pattern with 119 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K, showing that the resolution scaling penalty is consistent across presets.
Ultra settings present the most dramatic scaling, with 55 FPS at 1080p dropping to 37 FPS at 1440p and finally to 21 FPS at 4K. This 62% reduction from 1080p to 4K mirrors the High preset’s behavior, reinforcing that the RX 6650 XT’s compute resources and memory bandwidth are insufficient for 4K Ultra workloads. The data indicates that players targeting 4K should stick to Low or Medium settings, where the frame rates of 52 FPS and 46 FPS respectively remain playable, while High and Ultra at 4K fall below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
The fact that 1080p Low achieves 134 FPS while 4K Ultra only manages 21 FPS highlights the GPU’s pixel-rate limitations. With a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s, the RX 6650 XT can handle 1080p rendering with ease but struggles to fill the 8.3 million pixels of a 4K display at high graphical fidelity. The 17.5 Gbps effective memory clock and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth further constrain performance at 4K, where texture and shader data demands increase substantially.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ranks 2418 out of 3708 tested combos in Archeage, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the benchmark database. This percentile position, roughly the 35th percentile, indicates that while the combo is not a top-tier performer, it still offers adequate frame rates for most playable scenarios at 1080p and 1440p. The rank reflects the GPU’s middling standing among all tested graphics cards, as the RX 6650 XT sits at the 65th percentile versus all GPUs, while the CPU performs better relative to its peers.
The combo’s rank of 2418 suggests that many other hardware pairings deliver higher average FPS in Archeage, likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs with better multi-threaded performance. However, the rank is not a measure of playability; it simply positions this combo against all other tested configurations. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, this combo achieves 134 FPS, which would place it comfortably in the upper echelon of competitive playability, but the overall rank drags down by the 4K and Ultra results.
Comparatively, the CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32697 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.3% higher). These delta percentages are negligible, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7400F’s processing power is essentially on par with these alternatives, meaning the combo’s game rank is driven more by GPU performance than CPU differences.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (average score 19885, 0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D300 (19637, 0.7% lower), the AMD FirePro W7000 (19905, 0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19602, 0.8% lower). These are all professional or older workstation cards, which suggests that the RX 6650 XT’s gaming performance in Archeage is comparable to these enterprise-focused alternatives, though the RX 6650 XT benefits from modern RDNA 2.0 architecture and features like DirectX 12 Ultimate support.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip using the RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC with 11,060 million transistors. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The GPU’s boost clock of 2635 MHz and game clock of 2410 MHz are relatively high, allowing it to maintain strong performance in lighter loads, as evidenced by the 134 FPS at 1080p Low settings.
The GPU’s shading units number 2048, with 128 texture mapping units and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s, which are modest figures for modern gaming. The FP32 performance of 10.79 TFLOPS places the RX 6650 XT in the mid-range segment, and the data shows that this compute power is adequate for Archeage’s engine, which appears to favor lower resolutions and medium settings.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in Archeage’s performance, especially at 4K Ultra settings where the average FPS drops to 21. At 4K, the game’s texture and geometry data likely exceed the VRAM buffer, causing the GPU to rely on slower memory transfers or compression techniques, which degrades performance. The memory clock of 2190 MHz (17.5 Gbps effective) and the 128-bit bus width are the primary bottlenecks at high resolutions, as the 280.3 GB/s bandwidth cannot keep up with the demands of 4K rendering.
Interestingly, the GPU’s performance in synthetic benchmarks shows a passmark G3D score of 17166 and a passmark G2D score of 918, placing it at the 65th percentile versus all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 indicate that the GPU handles modern APIs well, but Archeage’s older engine (released in 2014) may not fully utilize these features. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility are present, but the game’s performance is more dependent on raw rasterization power than advanced features.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results, with Low settings achieving an average of 134 FPS, Medium at 119 FPS, and High at 81 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, still playable but with a significant performance hit. The Medium preset shows a minimum FPS of 101 and a maximum of 137, indicating good frame time consistency, while the other presets do not report min/max values. These numbers suggest that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, allowing for high refresh rate monitors at Low or Medium settings, and still maintaining smooth gameplay at High.
Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops noticeably: Low settings achieve 90 FPS, Medium 80 FPS, High 54 FPS, and Ultra 37 FPS. The Medium preset again provides min/max data with 68 FPS minimum and 92 FPS maximum, showing a wider variance than at 1080p. The 1440p results indicate that the GPU is being pushed harder, but the combo remains viable for 60 FPS gaming at Low or Medium settings, while High and Ultra require compromises.
At 3840x2160, the performance declines sharply: Low settings average 52 FPS, Medium 46 FPS, High 31 FPS, and Ultra 21 FPS. The Medium preset reports a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS, which is the only 4K preset with min/max data, suggesting that the others have too much variance or the data collection was limited. The 4K results show that the combo is only suitable for Low or Medium settings, and even then, the frame rates are on the edge of playability for fast-paced MMORPG combat.
Across all resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra settings is consistent: at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 79 FPS (134 to 55), at 1440p it is 53 FPS (90 to 37), and at 4K it is 31 FPS (52 to 21). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance headroom at lower settings cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations at 4K. The data also shows that the combo performs best at 1080p Medium, where the 119 FPS average with a 101 FPS minimum provides a smooth experience without the visual compromises of Low settings.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, making it an efficient desktop CPU. The processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample cache for MMORPG workloads that often involve complex game logic and scripting.
In Archeage, the CPU’s role is evident in the frame rates at lower resolutions and settings, where the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 134 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s maximum frame delivery capability for this game, given the CPU’s single-threaded performance. The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 3072 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3689 in Passmark single-thread, placing it at the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, which indicates strong per-core performance that benefits games with limited multi-threading.
The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a Passmark multithread score of 25645. However, Archeage, released in 2014, likely does not scale well across 12 threads, so the CPU’s performance in this game is more dependent on its single-core capabilities. The data supports this, as the combo’s frame rates at 1080p are competitive with more powerful systems, suggesting that the CPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution.
The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 and dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s also contributes to overall system performance, though the game’s engine may not fully utilize this bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes ensures that the GPU has sufficient bandwidth for data transfer, but the RX 6650 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is still adequate for this GPU’s performance level. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and active production status indicate that it is a modern, power-efficient part that pairs well with the mid-range GPU.
In terms of rivals, the Ryzen 5 7400F’s average benchmark score of 32750 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.2% lower), showing that CPU performance differences are minimal. This means that in Archeage, the combo’s rank is unlikely to change significantly with a different CPU in the same performance class, and the GPU choice has a greater impact on the game’s frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with an average of 119 FPS and a minimum of 101 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in busy MMORPG scenes. The High preset at 81 FPS is also viable for players prioritizing visuals, but the 38 FPS drop from Medium may not justify the graphical improvements.
For 2560x1440, the Low preset at 90 FPS is the most reliable choice for maintaining high frame rates, while the Medium preset at 80 FPS (minimum 68 FPS) still provides a playable experience. The High preset at 54 FPS is borderline, and the Ultra preset at 37 FPS is not recommended for competitive play, as frame drops below 30 FPS could occur in crowded areas. Players with 1440p monitors should select Low or Medium settings to ensure a consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 52 FPS is the only setting that offers a smooth experience, with Medium at 46 FPS (minimum 39 FPS) being acceptable for less demanding scenarios. The High preset at 31 FPS and Ultra at 21 FPS are too low for enjoyable gameplay, and players should avoid these settings unless they prioritize visual fidelity over performance. For 4K, the combo’s limitations are clear, and lowering resolution or settings is necessary for playable frame rates.
When considering the entire dataset, the Medium preset at 1080p provides the highest frame rate with min/max data (101 to 137 FPS), making it the recommended setting for most players. This configuration delivers over 100 FPS minimum, which is sufficient for smooth MMORPG combat, while maintaining better visual quality than Low. For players with high refresh rate monitors (144 Hz or higher), the Low preset at 134 FPS is the only setting that can approach those refresh rates, but the Medium preset’s 119 FPS average is still close enough for a satisfying experience.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Archeage?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Medium settings provides 119 FPS average and a 101 FPS minimum, making it the best balance of performance and visual quality. For higher resolutions, 2560x1440 Low (90 FPS) or Medium (80 FPS) are viable, while 4K should be limited to Low (52 FPS) or Medium (46 FPS).
Q: Can this combo handle Archeage at 4K resolution?
A: At 4K, the combo achieves 52 FPS on Low settings and 46 FPS on Medium, but drops to 31 FPS on High and 21 FPS on Ultra. The 4K experience is only playable at Low or Medium settings, with Ultra being too demanding for the Radeon RX 6650 XT.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F or the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT the bottleneck in this game?
A: The data indicates that the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as frame rates drop significantly from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072) allows for high frame rates, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit 4K performance.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested hardware in Archeage?
A: The combo ranks 2418 out of 3708 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle range. This rank is influenced by the GPU’s 65th percentile standing versus all GPUs, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile performance is relatively stronger.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS drops from 134 on Low settings to 55 on Ultra settings, a reduction of 79 FPS. This indicates that Ultra settings impose a significant load on the GPU, and Medium settings (119 FPS) provide a better compromise.
Q: Does this hardware support modern graphics APIs for future games?
A: The Radeon RX 6650 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which are modern APIs. However, Archeage was released in 2014 and may not fully utilize these features, as evidenced by the performance scaling that favors lower resolutions and settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 21.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 90.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 37.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 134.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 81.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 55.0 |
Archeage with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 6650 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.