Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Xeon Gold 6336Y Specifications
Xeon Gold 6336Y Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y features 24 physical cores and 48 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Gold 6336Y Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon Gold 6336Y benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon Gold 6336Y by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Xeon Gold 6336Y Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Gold 6336Y processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon Gold 6336Y's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Ice Lake Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y is built on Intel's 10 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Gold 6336Y incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Ice Lake Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Xeon Gold 6336Y by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Gold 6336Y Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 185W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 4189 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Xeon Gold 6336Y uses the Intel Socket 4189 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 4189 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Gold 6336Y define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon Gold 6336Y determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Xeon Gold 6336Y Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon Gold 6336Y by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Xeon Gold 6336Y Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. Higher scores mean faster render times in professional applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y after thermal limits kick in.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y maintains boost clocks under continuous load.
About Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y is a 24-core, 48-thread Ice Lake-SP server processor that lands in the 71st percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 11,191. The data shows a chip engineered for sustained multi-threaded throughput, but its single-core results reveal a more modest capability that shapes its workload profile. Its nearest rivals in the database — a mix of AMD EPYC parts and a low-power Intel Core mobile chip — bracket its average score within a narrow ±0.8% window, indicating that the 6336Y sits in a highly competitive performance tier where architectural differences matter more than raw score gaps.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The 6336Y's benchmark split is stark. In Cinebench R23, it scores 5,462 in single-core and 38,689 in multi-core — a ratio of roughly 7.1:1, which is exactly what one would expect from a 24-core design with a 3.60 GHz boost clock. The single-core score places it in a modest range for a 2021 server chip; the 2.40 GHz base clock clearly limits lightly-threaded responsiveness, while the 3.60 GHz boost provides only a moderate ceiling. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score of 2,294 against a multi-core score of 16,249 shows the same pattern: roughly 7.1x scaling, confirming that the chip scales almost linearly with core count in heavily parallel workloads.
This behavior means real-world applications that rely on a few fast cores — such as interactive database queries, single-threaded scripting, or lightly-parallel compilation stages — will not see the same benefits as fully parallel workloads. The multi-threaded results, however, are where the 6336Y makes its case. The R15 multi-core score of 3,899 and R20 multi-core score of 16,249 both indicate that the chip sustains high throughput across all 24 cores, likely due to the 36 MB shared L3 cache and the Ice Lake architecture's improved IPC over older server designs. For workloads that can saturate 48 threads, the single-thread deficit becomes irrelevant; for anything latency-sensitive or branch-heavy, it will be a limiting factor.
Power and Thermals
The 6336Y carries a 185 W TDP, which places it in the high-power segment of Intel's server lineup. This is not a chip for passive cooling or compact chassis; the data implies a robust thermal solution is mandatory. A 185 W TDP class typically requires a high-end air cooler or a liquid cooling loop in a server context, and the Ice Lake-SP architecture's 10 nm process node from Intel suggests that thermals are manageable but not trivial — the boost clock of 3.60 GHz on 24 cores will generate significant heat under sustained load. The eight-channel DDR4 memory bus, with a peak bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s, further indicates that the memory controllers and uncore will contribute to overall power draw, though the FACT PACK provides no separate figures for idle or partial-load consumption. For a system builder, the 185 W TDP means power delivery and chassis airflow must be planned for, not assumed; the 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes also draw additional power when populated, though no exact figures are given.
Benchmark Performance
Cinebench results show a consistent pattern: the 6336Y is a multi-core specialist. In R23, the 38,689 multi-core score is roughly 7.1x the single-core score of 5,462, which is excellent scaling. In R20, the 16,249 multi-core result versus 2,294 single-core yields the same ratio, and in R15, 3,899 versus 550 gives a 7.1x multiplier again. This linear scaling indicates that the 24 cores are fully utilized without significant thermal or power throttling in the benchmark environment. The average benchmark score of 11,191 places it just below the Intel Core i3-1305U (score 11,225, delta -0.3%) and just above the AMD EPYC 7542 (score 11,152, delta +0.4%). The delta percentages are tiny — less than one percent in all cases — meaning that in the database's aggregate metric, the 6336Y is effectively tied with its nearest rivals. However, the Cinebench multi-core scores tell a different story: the 6336Y's R23 multi-core result of 38,689 is substantially higher than what a 2-core mobile chip like the i3-1305U could produce, indicating that the average score is skewed by the i3's strong single-core performance. The 6336Y's 71st percentile ranking reflects this duality: it outperforms most CPUs in multi-threaded tests but underperforms many in single-threaded tests.
How It Compares
Intel Core i3-1305U: The 6336Y trails by 0.3% in average score (11,191 vs 11,225). This is a remarkable comparison because the i3-1305U is a low-power mobile chip with far fewer cores; the 6336Y's advantage in multi-threaded workloads is offset by the i3's superior single-core efficiency. In practice, the 6336Y will crush the i3 in any multi-threaded task, but the i3 will feel snappier in single-threaded desktop or light server tasks.
AMD EPYC 7542: The 6336Y leads by 0.4% (11,191 vs 11,152). The EPYC 7542 is a 32-core Zen 2 part, so the 6336Y's 24-core Ice Lake design manages to edge it out on average, likely due to higher per-core IPC. The delta is negligible, meaning both chips are interchangeable in aggregate performance, but the EPYC's higher core count may win in specific scale-out workloads while the 6336Y's higher clock speeds help in latency-bound tasks.
AMD EPYC 9224: The 6336Y leads by 0.7% (11,191 vs 11,118). The EPYC 9224 is a newer Genoa part, yet the 6336Y holds a slight edge in the database's average metric. This suggests that the 6336Y's 3.60 GHz boost clock and mature Ice Lake architecture compensate for the EPYC's architectural advantages in this particular benchmark suite. The gap is small enough to be noise, but the 6336Y is the nominal winner here.
AMD EPYC 7452: The 6336Y trails by 0.8% (11,191 vs 11,279). The EPYC 7452 is a 32-core Zen 2 chip, and its higher core count gives it a slight aggregate edge. The 6336Y's 24 cores are not enough to overcome the EPYC's core advantage in the average score, even though the 6336Y likely wins in single-threaded tests. This is the closest comparison, with the delta well within run-to-run variance.
Who Should Consider It
The 6336Y is designed for multi-threaded server and workstation workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,689 indicates strong performance for video rendering, 3D simulation, scientific computing, and batch data processing — tasks that scale across 48 threads. For gaming, the single-core score of 5,462 in R23 is mediocre compared to modern desktop chips, so this is not a gaming processor; the 185 W TDP and server socket also preclude typical consumer builds. For content creation, the multi-core results are compelling: the R20 score of 16,249 and R15 score of 3,899 show that rendering and encoding tasks will complete quickly, though single-threaded effects or plugin processing will lag. For office and general productivity, the 6336Y is overkill and underperforms in single-threaded tasks; a lower-core-count part with a higher boost clock would be more appropriate. The sweet spot is high-throughput computing: database servers, virtualization hosts, and multi-tenant workloads where the 48 threads and 36 MB L3 cache shine.
Platform and Compatibility
The 6336Y uses Intel Socket 4189, which is specific to Ice Lake-SP Xeon processors. It supports DDR4 memory in an eight-channel configuration, with a peak bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s — a figure that indicates high memory throughput for large datasets. ECC memory is supported, which is critical for server reliability. The chip provides 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and GPU connectivity. The platform's upgrade path is limited to other Ice Lake-SP Xeon parts, as Socket 4189 is not forward-compatible with newer architectures. The 10 nm process node from Intel suggests a mature manufacturing process, but the architecture is from 2021, so newer Xeon generations offer more features. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means no overclocking; the chip runs at stock clocks only. For a server platform, the eight-channel memory and 64 PCIe lanes are the key advantages, providing ample bandwidth for memory-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads.
FAQ
Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y?
A: The 6336Y has 24 cores and 48 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz.
Q: How does the 6336Y perform in single-threaded tasks?
A: Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5,462, which is modest for a server chip; the R20 single-core score is 2,294 and R15 single-core score is 550, indicating limited lightly-threaded performance.
Q: What memory configuration does the 6336Y support?
A: It supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with ECC, offering a peak bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s.
Q: Is the 6336Y good for gaming?
A: No. The single-core scores are too low for gaming, and the 185 W TDP plus server socket make it unsuitable for consumer gaming builds.
Q: What is the TDP of the 6336Y?
A: The TDP is 185 W, which requires a robust cooling solution in a server chassis.
Q: How does the 6336Y compare to the AMD EPYC 7542?
A: The 6336Y has an average score of 11,191 versus 11,152 for the EPYC 7542, a delta of +0.4%, meaning the 6336Y has a negligible aggregate advantage.
The AMD Equivalent of Xeon Gold 6336Y
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y Comparisons
See how the Xeon Gold 6336Y stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Xeon Gold 6336Y with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs