Intel Core i7-11375H

The Intel Core i7-11375H is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the Tiger Lake-H family, built on Intel's 10 nm process. Its benchmark profile places it at the 55th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3058, indicating a mid-range standing that is competitive with, but not dominant over, its closest rivals. The data reveals a processor engineered for responsiveness in short bursts, with a significant gap between its single-thread and multi-thread capabilities that defines its practical applications.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-11375H show a processor that is closely matched with its nearest rivals, with all deltas within a narrow 1.6% band. The average benchmark score of 3058 puts it just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U (average score 3063), a negligible difference that places the two effectively at parity. The data shows a slightly larger gap against the Intel Core i7-8700B, where the i7-11375H trails by 0.6% (3077 average score), and a 1.1% deficit versus the Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 (3092 average score). The largest disadvantage is against the Intel Xeon W-2133, which leads by 1.6% with an average score of 3107.

In specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9959 reveals the processor's sustained throughput capability, while the single-core score of 1406 highlights its burst performance. The Geekbench scores further corroborate this split: a single-core score of 1800 versus a multi-core score of 5383. The Cinebench R20 results show 4182 multi-core and 590 single-core, while R15 shows 1003 multi-core and 141 single-core. These numbers indicate that the i7-11375H is not a top-tier performer in its class, but rather a competent mid-range option whose performance is statistically indistinguishable from its immediate competitors. The percentile ranking of 55 confirms that more than half of all CPUs outperform it, yet its positioning suggests it will handle everyday tasks with ease.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core i7-11375H is built on the Tiger Lake architecture and uses the Intel BGA 1449 socket, which is permanently attached to the motherboard, meaning there is no upgrade path for the processor itself. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is sufficient for its class. ECC memory is not supported, so users requiring error-correcting memory for data integrity must look elsewhere. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for modern NVMe SSDs and discrete graphics cards, though the number of available lanes is limited compared to desktop platforms.

The integrated graphics are Iris XE 96EU, which offers a baseline level of visual output without a dedicated GPU. The processor was released on January 10, 2021, and its production status is listed as Active, meaning it remains available for system integrators. The socket and platform characteristics indicate this is a mobile-first design, prioritizing integration over expandability. The lack of an unlocked multiplier, with multiplierUnlocked set to false, means overclocking is not officially supported, so performance is fixed at the factory settings. The 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry keeps the die size at 146.1 mm², a compact footprint that suits thin-and-light laptops.

Who Should Consider It

Given the benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-11375H is best suited for users whose workloads emphasize single-thread performance and light multi-threading. The single-core scores, such as the Cinebench R23 result of 1406, indicate strong responsiveness for everyday office applications, web browsing, and productivity software that rarely utilizes more than a few threads. The multi-core score of 9959 in Cinebench R23, while respectable, shows that heavily threaded tasks like video rendering or 3D modeling will not see exceptional performance, as the 4-core design limits parallel throughput.

For gaming, the processor's single-thread strength is a positive indicator, as many game engines rely on a few fast cores. However, the 4-core limitation may become a bottleneck in modern titles that scale across more threads, so the i7-11375H would pair best with a mid-range GPU rather than a top-tier one. Content creators working with short clips or photo editing in applications that favor single-core speed will find it adequate, but those doing long-form 4K video exports should consider a higher-core-count alternative. The integrated Iris XE 96EU graphics allow for basic media playback and light casual gaming without a dedicated card, but the data suggests this is not a processor for demanding graphical workloads. The dual-channel DDR4 memory support and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most office and consumer workloads, though power users will notice the ceiling.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-11375H compare to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U?

A: The average benchmark score of the i7-11375H is 3058, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U's average score of 3063. This places the two processors at near-identical performance levels.

Q: What is the single-core performance of the i7-11375H?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1406, while the Geekbench single-core score is 1800. These results indicate strong burst performance for lightly threaded tasks.

Q: Does the i7-11375H support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so the processor runs at its specified base and boost clocks without user adjustment.

Q: What memory type does the i7-11375H support?

A: It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the integrated graphics solution on this processor?

A: The i7-11375H features Iris XE 96EU integrated graphics, which provides basic video output and light graphical capability without a dedicated GPU.

Q: Which socket does the i7-11375H use, and can it be upgraded?

A: It uses the Intel BGA 1449 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, so the processor cannot be upgraded or replaced.

Power and Thermals

The Intel Core i7-11375H has a thermal design power (TDP) of 28 watts, which classifies it as a low-power mobile processor. This TDP figure implies that a capable air cooler or a modest heat pipe solution in a thin-and-light chassis will be sufficient to manage thermals under load. The 28 W TDP is typical for processors designed for portability, balancing performance and battery life. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is high for this power class, suggesting that sustained single-core loads may cause the processor to reach higher temperatures, but the 10 nm process helps mitigate heat generation. The base clock of 3.00 GHz provides a baseline for all-core operations, and the 4-core design means that heat density is manageable within a compact laptop form factor. Users should expect that a laptop housing this processor will likely run quietly during normal use but may produce audible fan noise during extended multi-core workloads, given the boost behavior.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The data reveals a pronounced asymmetry between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The single-core Geekbench score of 1800 and Cinebench R23 score of 1406 are strong, reflecting a high boost clock of 5.00 GHz that allows the processor to deliver rapid responses in tasks that depend on a single core. In contrast, the multi-core Geekbench score of 5383 and Cinebench R23 score of 9959 suggest that scaling across the 4 cores is efficient but limited by the physical core count. The ratio between single-core and multi-core scores, when compared to the 4-core/8-thread configuration, implies that hyper-threading provides a modest uplift, but the processor cannot match the parallel throughput of higher-core-count alternatives.

This behavior means that real-world applications will see excellent performance in tasks like opening applications, scrolling through documents, or compiling code that is not fully parallelized. Conversely, workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or running multiple virtual machines will be constrained by the 4-core limit, and the multi-core scores confirm that the i7-11375H will fall behind processors with more cores in these scenarios. The single-thread advantage, however, makes it a good fit for legacy software or applications with poor multi-threading optimization, where the high boost clock will shine.

How It Compares

Against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, the i7-11375H is effectively tied, with the Ryzen holding a 0.2% average score advantage. The data suggests that in single-thread tasks, the Intel part's high boost clock may give it an edge, but in multi-thread workloads, the two are indistinguishable. This rivalry is close enough that other factors like platform features or price would likely decide a purchase.

The Intel Core i7-8700B presents a 0.6% performance lead over the i7-11375H. The 8700B, being a desktop-class chip, likely benefits from higher sustained power limits, but the i7-11375H's modern architecture and faster boost clock narrow the gap. In practice, the i7-11375H would offer similar responsiveness in single-threaded tasks but may trail in prolonged multi-threaded runs.

The Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3, a workstation processor, leads the i7-11375H by 1.1% in average score. The Xeon's advantage likely comes from having more cores, which boosts its multi-thread results, but the i7-11375H counters with superior single-core speed. For users prioritizing single-thread performance, the i7-11375H is competitive, but for multi-threaded workstation tasks, the Xeon is stronger.

The Intel Xeon W-2133 has the largest lead over the i7-11375H, at 1.6%. This Xeon part likely offers more cores and higher memory bandwidth, which explains its multi-thread advantage. However, the i7-11375H's single-core scores are likely higher, making it a better choice for applications that are latency-sensitive. The data shows that the i7-11375H sits at the bottom of this rival group in average performance, but the deltas are small enough that real-world differences will be minor for most users.