Intel Core i3-2367M

The Intel Core i3-2367M is a dual-core mobile processor from Intel’s Sandy Bridge generation, released in late September 2011. It operates with a base clock of 1400.00 MHz, supports four threads via Hyper-Threading, and draws a rated TDP of 17 watts. Its benchmark results place it near the very bottom of the overall performance distribution, sitting at the 3rd percentile when compared against all CPUs. The average benchmark score across its two Geekbench tests is 348, with a multi-core score of 476 and a single-core score of 219. This processor is now end-of-life and targets ultra-portable laptops where power efficiency takes priority over raw speed.

How It Compares

Against the Intel Core i3-2312M, the closest rival in the data set, the i3-2367M is essentially tied. The rival’s average score is 347, while the i3-2367M posts an average of 348, yielding a delta of 0.2% in favor of the newer part. This is a negligible difference in real-world terms; both chips sit in the same performance class. The i3-2312M is a more conventional 35-watt dual-core part, yet the benchmark data shows that the power-optimized 17-watt i3-2367M does not sacrifice any measurable average performance relative to that higher-power sibling.

The Intel Core i7-680UM is a rival from an older ultra-low-voltage line, with an average score of 349. The i3-2367M trails it by 0.4%, a margin so small that it falls within typical run-to-run variance. Despite the i7 branding on the rival, the i3-2367M matches it almost exactly in aggregate benchmark output. The i7-680UM also carries a 17-watt TDP class, so this comparison shows that the i3-2367M delivers comparable efficiency-tier performance without needing the premium i7 label.

The AMD Opteron 2222 is a server-oriented dual-core processor, scoring an average of 350. The i3-2367M is 0.6% behind this rival. That delta is statistically insignificant, but it is notable that a low-power mobile chip from 2011 can keep pace with a server part in these synthetic benchmarks. The Opteron targets a completely different market segment, yet the average scores converge, indicating that the i3-2367M’s architecture is competitive even outside its intended usage.

The Intel Celeron 3755U is a more modern budget mobile chip, with an average score of 345. The i3-2367M leads by 0.8%, the largest margin among its nearest rivals. While the Celeron is built on a newer process and architecture, the i3-2367M’s higher thread count (4 threads vs. likely 2) helps it edge ahead in the aggregate benchmark. This is the only rival where the i3-2367M shows a clear, albeit modest, advantage.

Power and Thermals

The i3-2367M carries a TDP rating of 17 watts, placing it firmly in the ultra-low-power mobile segment. This TDP class implies that the processor can be cooled by a passive heatsink or a very small, low-speed fan, making it suitable for thin-and-light notebooks, netbooks, and fanless designs. The 17-watt envelope is less than half of what many standard mobile dual-core processors from the same era required, allowing system builders to prioritize battery life and compact form factors over peak performance.

Because the base clock is just 1400.00 MHz, the thermal density is low even under sustained loads. The processor does not require a robust cooling solution; a simple heat pipe attached to a small radiator is typically sufficient. For users upgrading or repurposing an old laptop, any stock cooler designed for a 17-watt Sandy Bridge part will be adequate. The absence of a boost clock means there are no transient thermal spikes to manage, as the chip runs at a constant frequency. This predictable power draw also simplifies thermal design for embedded or industrial applications that might use this processor.

Benchmark Performance

The Geekbench multi-core score of 476 for the i3-2367M is the strongest individual result in its benchmark suite, but it still places the chip near the bottom of the overall CPU hierarchy. In single-core testing, the score drops to 219, reflecting the low base clock. The average benchmark score of 348 is derived from these two tests, and it aligns closely with the nearest rivals.

Relative to the Intel Core i3-2312M, the i3-2367M achieves a 0.2% higher average score (348 vs. 347). This is effectively a tie, meaning the lower clock speed of the i3-2367M is fully compensated by other architectural factors or by the specific workloads in the benchmark. The multi-core score of 476 suggests that the four threads help in parallel workloads, while the single-core score of 219 indicates that lightly threaded tasks will feel sluggish.

Against the Intel Core i7-680UM, the i3-2367M is 0.4% slower on average (348 vs. 349). That difference is within noise, but it shows that the i3-2367M does not outperform an older premium part. The i7-680UM likely has a higher turbo frequency, which would explain its slight edge in single-threaded tasks, but the i3-2367M’s consistent 1400.00 MHz clock keeps the gap minimal.

The AMD Opteron 2222 leads the i3-2367M by 0.6% (350 vs. 348). Given that the Opteron is a server chip with a much higher TDP, this result is surprising. It suggests that the i3-2367M’s Sandy Bridge architecture is highly efficient in these synthetic tests, even when competing against a part designed for entirely different workloads. The multi-core score of 476 would likely be higher than the Opteron’s in threaded tests, but the aggregate average pulls them close.

The Intel Celeron 3755U trails the i3-2367M by 0.8% (345 vs. 348). This is the largest delta in the rival group, and it comes from the i3-2367M’s additional threads. The Celeron, being a dual-core without Hyper-Threading, cannot match the parallel throughput of the i3-2367M. For multi-threaded applications that can use all four threads, the i3-2367M would show a more pronounced advantage than the 0.8% average suggests.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i3-2367M?

A: The TDP is rated at 17 watts, which classifies it as an ultra-low-power mobile processor.

Q: How many cores and threads does this processor have?

A: It has 2 physical cores and 4 threads, enabled by Hyper-Threading technology.

Q: What is the base clock speed?

A: The base clock is 1400.00 MHz. There is no boost clock available, so it runs at this frequency under all conditions.

Q: Does it support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The processor supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What integrated graphics does it include?

A: It includes Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics, which is the GPU generation paired with Sandy Bridge mobile processors.

Q: What is the release date of this processor?

A: It was released on September 30, 2011, and is now marked as end-of-life.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core i3-2367M uses the Intel BGA 1023 socket, which is a ball-grid array package designed for direct soldering to the motherboard. This means the processor is not upgradeable or replaceable in a typical laptop; it is permanently attached. The socket is specific to Sandy Bridge mobile chips, and the architecture is codenamed Sandy Bridge, built on a 32 nm process node from Intel. The processor integrates 624 million transistors on a die size of 149 mm².

Memory support is limited to DDR3, running in dual-channel mode. The memory bus width is dual-channel, which provides adequate bandwidth for the 1400.00 MHz core clock. There is no PCIe information provided in the data, so the expansion capabilities are not quantified here. The integrated graphics, Intel HD 3000, shares the system memory for its frame buffer, so dual-channel DDR3 is beneficial for graphics performance.

The upgrade path is essentially nonexistent for this processor due to the BGA socket. Users cannot swap it for a faster Sandy Bridge chip without replacing the entire motherboard. The platform is further constrained by the end-of-life production status, meaning no new motherboards or systems are being manufactured with this socket. For those already owning a laptop with this chip, the only practical upgrades are to the RAM or storage, not the CPU.

Who Should Consider It

The i3-2367M is suited for basic office productivity and web browsing, where its dual-core, four-thread configuration can handle light multitasking without issue. The multi-core score of 476 indicates that applications like word processing, spreadsheet management, and email clients will run acceptably, though not quickly. The single-core score of 219 is low, so any workload that relies heavily on one thread, such as script-heavy websites or older single-threaded software, will feel sluggish.

For gaming, this processor is not recommended. The integrated Intel HD 3000 graphics, combined with the low 1400.00 MHz core clock, will struggle with any modern 3D title. Even older games from the early 2010s would require reduced resolutions and low detail settings. The benchmark percentile of 3% places it far below what is needed for a playable gaming experience.

For content creation, the i3-2367M is inadequate. Video editing, 3D rendering, or photo processing tasks that benefit from parallel execution would see some benefit from the four threads, but the overall processing power is too limited. The average benchmark score of 348 is less than half of what a mid-range desktop processor from the same era would achieve, so long render times are inevitable.

The ideal use case for this chip is a secondary or backup laptop for light productivity, or a dedicated device for battery-conscious users who prioritize portability over performance. Its 17-watt TDP enables long battery life and silent operation, which are more valuable than raw speed for such scenarios. Users who already own a system with this processor should focus on maximizing RAM and using an SSD, as those upgrades will provide more noticeable improvements than any CPU-related tweak.