Intel Celeron G1820TE
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Celeron G1820TE Specifications
Celeron G1820TE Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Celeron G1820TE features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Celeron G1820TE Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Celeron G1820TE benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Celeron G1820TE by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Celeron G1820TE Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Celeron G1820TE processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Celeron G1820TE's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Haswell Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Celeron G1820TE is built on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Celeron G1820TE incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Haswell Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Celeron G1820TE by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Celeron G1820TE has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 54W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 1150 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Celeron G1820TE uses the Intel Socket 1150 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 1150 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Celeron G1820TE define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Celeron G1820TE determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Celeron G1820TE Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Celeron G1820TE includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Celeron G1820TE provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Celeron G1820TE by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
About Intel Celeron G1820TE
The Intel Celeron G1820TE is a dual-core desktop processor built on Intel's Haswell architecture and 22 nm process, running at a fixed 2.20 GHz with no turbo boost. It offers 2 threads, 3 MB of shared L3 cache, and a 54 W TDP, and its benchmark results place it in the 4th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 372 across the test suite. This is an entry-level part designed for basic computing, and its performance data confirms that position.
Benchmark Performance
The G1820TE delivers very low absolute scores across all measured workloads. In Cinebench R15, it reaches 87 points multi-core; in R20, 364 multi-core and 51 single-core; in R23, 867 multi-core and 122 single-core. Geekbench results show 707 multi-core and 407 single-core. The single-core numbers are especially telling: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 122 is near the floor for modern processors, and the Geekbench single-core figure of 407 is similarly modest. The multi-core scores, while higher, are still extremely limited because the chip has only two physical cores and no hyper-threading.
Relative to its nearest rivals, the G1820TE is effectively tied. Its average benchmark score of 372 is within 1% of all four listed competitors. The Intel Celeron 1020M posts an average score of 372, which is 0.1% lower; the AMD A8-5545M also scores 372, but 0.1% higher; the Intel Core i7-660UM averages 375, 0.9% lower; and the AMD Phenom II X2 B57 averages 368, 1% higher. These deltas are negligible in practice, meaning the G1820TE sits in a performance cluster where every chip delivers essentially the same user experience. The 4th percentile ranking reinforces that this is among the slowest CPUs in the benchmark database, with only 4% of all tested processors performing worse.
How It Compares
Intel Celeron 1020M – This mobile dual-core chip has an average score of 372, which is 0.1% behind the G1820TE. The two are functionally identical in performance, despite the 1020M being designed for laptops. Users upgrading from a 1020M to the G1820TE would see no meaningful change in compute speed.
AMD A8-5545M – Another mobile processor, the A8-5545M averages 372, just 0.1% ahead of the G1820TE. This AMD part includes a more capable integrated GPU, but in CPU-bound tasks the G1820TE is on par. The difference is far too small to affect real-world responsiveness.
Intel Core i7-660UM – A low-voltage mobile i7 from an older generation, the i7-660UM scores 375 on average, 0.9% higher than the G1820TE. Despite its "i7" branding, the 660UM was a low-power part, and its performance is essentially equivalent to the Celeron. The G1820TE's newer architecture does not translate into a measurable advantage here.
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 – A desktop dual-core from AMD, the B57 averages 368, which is 1% above the G1820TE. This is the largest delta among the rivals, but still within the margin of error for such low scores. The G1820TE trails slightly, but no user would notice the difference in typical workloads.
Power and Thermals
The G1820TE has a TDP of 54 W, which is modest for a desktop processor. This rating, combined with the absence of a boost clock, means the chip draws a steady, predictable amount of power under load. The 22 nm process and 1.4 billion transistors on a 177 mm² die contribute to efficient operation. A basic air cooler — even a low-profile or stock unit — is sufficient to keep the processor within safe temperatures, as the thermal load is low. The 54 W TDP also makes the chip suitable for small-form-factor builds or systems where cooling is limited. There is no need for liquid cooling or large tower coolers; the data indicates a simple, passive or low-speed fan solution would be adequate.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Celeron G1820TE support ECC memory?
A: No, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory as false.
Q: What type of memory does it use?
A: It supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration.
Q: Does it have integrated graphics?
A: Yes, it includes Intel HD (Haswell) integrated graphics.
Q: What socket does it use?
A: It uses Intel Socket 1150.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the multiplier is locked.
Q: When was it released?
A: The release date is November 30, 2013.
Q: How much L3 cache does it have?
A: It has 3 MB of shared L3 cache.
Who Should Consider It
Given its benchmark scores, the G1820TE is only suitable for the lightest computing tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 867 and Geekbench multi-core of 707 indicate that it can handle basic office applications, web browsing, and document editing without significant lag, provided the software is not too demanding. However, any workload that requires sustained multi-core performance — such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or modern gaming — will be severely constrained. The single-core scores of 122 in R23 and 407 in Geekbench are too low for smooth gameplay or responsive creative tools. This processor is best suited for a secondary PC, a home server running simple services, or a dedicated machine for word processing and email. It is not a gaming CPU, nor is it a content-creation CPU; the data clearly shows it sits at the bottom of the performance spectrum.
Platform and Compatibility
The G1820TE is built for the Intel Socket 1150 platform, which supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel layout. It provides PCIe Gen 3 connectivity, allowing for compatible expansion cards. The integrated Intel HD (Haswell) graphics eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic setups. Because the socket is shared with other Haswell-generation desktop processors, users have a potential upgrade path within the same platform, though the G1820TE's low performance means any upgrade would be a significant step up. The processor is still listed as "Active" in production, and its 22 nm process node and 1.4 billion transistors are typical of the Haswell generation. The lack of ECC memory support limits its use in error-sensitive server environments, but for a home or office machine, the platform is straightforward and compatible with common DDR3 modules.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The G1820TE's single-thread and multi-thread scores reveal a chip that is uniformly weak. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 867 is about 7.1 times the single-core score of 122 — a ratio that seems high, but only because the single-core number is so low. The Geekbench results are more indicative: multi-core 707 versus single-core 407 gives a ratio of 1.74, close to the theoretical 2.0 for a dual-core without hyper-threading. This suggests the processor scales reasonably with additional cores, but the absolute performance per core is minimal. In real workloads, this means that while adding a second core helps, the entire chip is still far below what modern software expects. The single-core performance is particularly limiting for tasks that rely on one thread, such as older games or some office applications, where the G1820TE will feel sluggish. The multi-core advantage, while present, does not rescue the overall experience because even the best-case multi-core scores are very low. Users should expect consistent, but very low, performance across all types of workloads.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the Intel Celeron G1820TE are below.
Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Celeron G1820TE performs in parallel rendering workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Celeron G1820TE. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Celeron G1820TE. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Celeron G1820TE after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Celeron G1820TE maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.
geekbench_multicoreSource
Geekbench multi-core tests Intel Celeron G1820TE across real-world workloads including image processing, machine learning, and data compression. All available threads are utilized to measure parallel performance. Higher scores indicate better capability in multitasking and content creation. The cross-platform nature of Geekbench allows direct comparison with systems running different operating systems.
geekbench_singlecoreSource
Geekbench single-core measures how fast one thread of Intel Celeron G1820TE can process tasks like web browsing and document editing. This score correlates with how snappy the system feels during normal use. Many applications still depend primarily on single-thread performance. Gaming performance is also heavily influenced by single-core speed in CPU-limited scenarios.
Compare with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs