AMD Athlon II X2 220
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Athlon II X2 220 Specifications
Athlon II X2 220 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Athlon II X2 220 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Athlon II X2 220 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Athlon II X2 220 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Athlon II X2 220 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Athlon II X2 220 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Athlon II X2 220's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
K10 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 is built on AMD's 45 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Athlon II X2 220 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
K10 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Athlon II X2 220 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Athlon II X2 220 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket AM3 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Athlon II X2 220 uses the AMD Socket AM3 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket AM3 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Athlon II X2 220 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Athlon II X2 220 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's Athlon II X2 220 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Athlon II X2 220 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Athlon II X2 220 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Athlon II X2 220 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Athlon II X2 220 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD Athlon II X2 220 performs in parallel rendering workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD Athlon II X2 220. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD Athlon II X2 220. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD Athlon II X2 220 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD Athlon II X2 220 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.
About AMD Athlon II X2 220
The AMD Athlon II X2 220 is a dual-core desktop processor from the K10 architecture family, built on a 45 nm process under the Regor codename. Released in late 2010, it operates at a base clock of 2.80 GHz and is now end-of-life, occupying a distinctly entry-level position in the benchmark database with an average score of 303.
Benchmark Performance
The Athlon II X2 220 delivers an average benchmark score of 303, which places it in the absolute lowest percentile tier of all CPUs tracked, at a percentile value of 0. This indicates that virtually every other processor in the database outperforms it in aggregate. The specific workload scores confirm a consistent, if modest, level of capability. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 88 points, while in Cinebench R20 multi-core it reaches 370 points and 52 points in single-core. The newer Cinebench R23 results show 883 points multi-core and 124 points single-core.
These numbers tell a clear story of a processor designed for basic tasks rather than demanding parallel workloads. The multi-core scores, while higher than single-core, reflect the limitation of having only two physical cores and two threads. The single-core scores, particularly the 124 points in Cinebench R23, indicate that even lightly-threaded applications will not see exceptional performance. The data positions this chip as a baseline performer, where the gap to even modest modern processors is substantial. For context, the average benchmark score of 303 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, suggesting that within its immediate competitive set, it is neither a standout nor a laggard, but rather a typical representative of its class.
Power and Thermals
The processor carries a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts, a figure that classifies it as a low-power part by contemporary standards. This TDP rating implies that a basic, stock air cooler is sufficient for maintaining operational temperatures. The 45 nm process node and the relatively low clock speed of 2.80 GHz contribute to this modest thermal envelope. Users should expect quiet operation and minimal heat output, making the chip suitable for compact or passively cooled systems where thermal management is a priority. The lack of a boost clock means the processor runs at a constant frequency, which simplifies thermal behavior; it will not spike to higher power states under load. The 65-watt class also suggests that power supply requirements are minimal, though specific wattage figures are not part of the available data.
How It Compares
Against the Intel Pentium E6300, the Athlon II X2 220 shows a razor-thin advantage of 0.5% in average benchmark score (303 vs. 301). This effectively makes the two processors performance equals, with any real-world difference being within the margin of error. The data suggests that users upgrading from one to the other would see no tangible benefit.
The comparison with the Intel Celeron N2940 shows a slight deficit, with the Athlon II X2 220 trailing by 0.7% (303 vs. 305). The N2940 is a quad-core part, yet its lower per-core performance keeps it in the same performance band. This indicates that the Athlon's dual-core design is competitive with low-power quad-core alternatives in aggregate workloads, though the N2940 may have an edge in multi-threaded scenarios.
Versus the Intel Celeron N2930, the Athlon II X2 220 leads by 0.7% (303 vs. 301). Like the N2940, the N2930 is a quad-core processor, but the results show that core count alone does not guarantee superiority. The Athlon's higher clock speed appears to offset the Celeron's additional cores in the benchmark aggregate.
Finally, the AMD Athlon II X2 240 is a direct sibling, and the X2 220 trails it by 1.5% (303 vs. 308). This is the largest delta among the listed rivals, though still a small margin. The X2 240 likely benefits from a slightly higher clock speed, but the performance gap remains minor, reinforcing that these two parts are nearly interchangeable in everyday use.
Who Should Consider It
Benchmark results indicate that the Athlon II X2 220 is suited exclusively for basic office productivity, light web browsing, and document editing. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 124 and multi-core score of 883 illustrate that it can handle single-threaded tasks like spreadsheet manipulation and word processing without significant strain, but it will struggle with more complex workloads. For gaming, the data suggests this is not a viable option; modern titles require far greater multi-core throughput than the 370 points in Cinebench R20 can provide. Similarly, content creation workloads such as video editing or 3D rendering are out of reach, as the multi-core scores are far below what those applications demand. The processor is best viewed as a functional, low-cost solution for a secondary machine, a basic home PC, or a dedicated office terminal where performance expectations are minimal. Users with more demanding needs should look to parts with higher benchmark scores, as the percentile rank of 0 indicates this chip is at the very bottom of the performance spectrum.
Platform and Compatibility
The Athlon II X2 220 uses the AMD Socket AM3 interface, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same platform generation. It supports dual-channel DDR3 memory, though specific bandwidth figures are not provided. The memory controller does not support ECC memory, which limits its use in error-sensitive server or workstation environments. PCIe Gen 2 is supported, offering adequate bandwidth for older expansion cards and storage devices. Integrated graphics are not included on the processor die; instead, they are available as a chipset feature on certain motherboards, meaning a discrete GPU is typically required for video output. The processor has a locked multiplier, preventing overclocking through that route, although base clock adjustments may be possible on some motherboards. The 45 nm process and 410 million transistors on a 117 mm² die size indicate a mature manufacturing technology. The socket's compatibility with other AM3 processors means users can potentially upgrade to higher-performing parts within the same platform, provided the motherboard BIOS supports them. However, with the production status listed as end-of-life, new units are no longer manufactured, so procurement is limited to existing stock or the used market. The part number is ADX220OCK22GM, which can be used for identification. The platform does not support PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5, nor does it offer any modern connectivity features, reinforcing its legacy status.
The Intel Equivalent of Athlon II X2 220
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-580M offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Athlon II X2 220 Comparisons
See how the Athlon II X2 220 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Athlon II X2 220 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs