AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile processor built on the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, and fabricated on a 12 nm process by GlobalFoundries. It integrates 4 cores with 8 threads, a base clock of 2.30 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, along with Radeon Vega 10 integrated graphics. The benchmark data positions this chip squarely in the mid-range of the database, holding a 44th percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1833 across all tested workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U’s average benchmark score of 1833 places it in a tightly contested cluster of competing processors. The nearest rival, the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G, scores 1836, representing a negligible 0.1% delta in favor of the Athlon. This effectively means the two chips are performance equals in aggregate, a surprising result given the Ryzen 7’s higher tier designation. Meanwhile, the Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 scores 1840, putting it 0.4% ahead of the 3700U, while the Intel Xeon D-1537 trails by a mere 0.2% with a score of 1830.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 reveals the processor’s peak throughput capability. In single-core R23, the score drops to 874, which is a substantial reduction but consistent with a mobile chip designed for power efficiency. The Geekbench results tell a similar story: a multi-core score of 2977 versus a single-core score of 935. These numbers suggest that the 3700U delivers competitive multi-threaded performance for its class, yet its single-thread showing is notably less impressive. The data implies that in mixed workloads, the processor relies heavily on its ability to engage all 8 threads to stay competitive with rivals that may have higher per-core clocks.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The disparity between single-core and multi-core scores is pronounced. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 6197 is roughly 7.1 times higher than the single-core score of 874, which is a typical ratio for a 4-core/8-thread part. However, the absolute single-core numbers—874 in R23 and 935 in Geekbench—point to a clear weakness. For applications that rely on a single thread, such as legacy software or lightly-threaded games, the 3700U will lag behind more modern architectures that boast higher IPC and faster boost clocks.

Conversely, the multi-core performance tells a more optimistic story. A Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 624 and an R20 score of 2602 indicate that the processor scales well when all cores are active. The data suggests that tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation that can leverage 8 threads will see near-linear improvement, allowing the 3700U to outperform its single-core limitations. This split implies a workload-dependent experience: responsive for parallel tasks, but underwhelming for serial ones. The boost clock of 4.00 GHz is high, yet the architecture’s Zen+ design means it cannot sustain that frequency effectively for single-thread bursts compared to newer rivals.

Who Should Consider It

For gaming, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U presents a mixed profile. The Radeon Vega 10 integrated graphics handle display output, but the CPU’s single-core scores—874 in R23 and 935 in Geekbench—suggest that frame rates in CPU-bound titles will be limited. The data indicates that esports titles with modest CPU demands may run acceptably, but triple-A games that require strong per-core performance will likely bottleneck. Users seeking a gaming laptop should look at the multi-core scores for physics and AI calculations, but the 367 single-core score in Cinebench R20 is a warning sign for sustained high-refresh-rate gaming.

For content creation, the 3700U is more compelling. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 6197 and R20 score of 2602 demonstrate solid throughput for rendering and batch processing. A user editing 1080p video or exporting large images will benefit from the 8 threads, though the 12 nm process and 15 W TDP mean long render times will push the thermal limits. Office and productivity workloads are the safest bet. The Geekbench multi-core score of 2977 exceeds what most daily tasks require, and the processor’s ability to boost to 4.00 GHz for short bursts ensures responsive spreadsheet, browser, and document handling. The data suggests this is a chip for a user who prioritizes parallel throughput over raw single-thread speed.

How It Compares

Against the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G, the 3700U is effectively tied, with the Athlon holding a 0.1% average score advantage (1836 vs 1833). This is remarkable because the Athlon is a lower-tier part, yet the benchmark data shows no meaningful performance gap, implying that the 3700U’s extra features like integrated Radeon Vega 10 do not translate into CPU compute superiority.

The Intel Xeon D-1537 is a server-oriented chip, and its average score of 1830 puts it 0.2% behind the 3700U. This near-parity is notable given the Xeon’s enterprise positioning; the 3700U matches it in aggregate benchmarks, though the Xeon likely excels in sustained workloads due to different thermal design goals. For the 3700U, this comparison highlights that its performance is respectable even against server parts.

The Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 leads the 3700U by 0.4%, with a score of 1840. This is a small but consistent margin, suggesting that the older Xeon’s higher base clocks and different architecture provide a slight edge in the average benchmark mix. The 3700U’s delta of -0.4% means it is within a rounding error of this rival, indicating that the Ryzen’s efficiency does not sacrifice much raw performance.

Finally, the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 scores 1821, which is 0.6% behind the 3700U. The 3700U’s lead is minimal, but it demonstrates that a modern mobile chip can outpace a desktop-class Xeon from a previous generation in these benchmarks. The data shows a very flat competitive landscape where the 3700U neither dominates nor is dominated by its nearest rivals.

Power and Thermals

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is rated at a 15 W TDP, which is a standard figure for ultraportable and thin-and-light laptops. The 12 nm process node and 210 mm² die size, containing 4,940 million transistors, are relevant context: this is not a high-power desktop part. A 15 W TDP implies that the processor is designed for passive or low-noise cooling solutions, likely a small fan or a heat pipe connected to a modest heatsink.

The benchmark scores, particularly the multi-core figures, suggest that the 3700U can reach its full performance only when the thermal solution allows sustained boost. In a 15 W envelope, the processor’s 4.00 GHz boost clock is likely bursty, with sustained all-core workloads causing the clocks to drop to maintain thermal limits. The data indicates that a capable air cooler with a low-profile design is sufficient, but a user should not expect desktop-level sustained performance. The transistor count and die size also hint at a design that balances power efficiency with compute, rather than raw throughput. For system integrators, the 15 W TDP means battery life can be prioritized, but thermal throttling under prolonged load is a real risk based on the score-to-TDP ratio.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U?

A: The average benchmark score is 1833, placing it in the 44th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare to the Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5?

A: The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has an average score of 1840, which is 0.4% higher than the 3700U’s 1833.

Q: What are the single-core and multi-core Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The single-core score is 874, while the multi-core score is 6197.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: What is the socket type for this processor?

A: It uses AMD Socket FP5.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U?

A: The TDP is 15 W, indicating a low-power mobile design.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is built for the AMD Socket FP5, a mobile-specific socket that is not compatible with desktop platforms. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support, which aligns with its consumer and business mobile positioning. The memory bus is dual-channel, which provides adequate bandwidth for the integrated Radeon Vega 10 graphics, though the FACT PACK does not specify a memory bandwidth figure.

For expansion, the processor supports PCIe Gen 3, which is a previous-generation standard but remains sufficient for NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs in a laptop chassis. The integrated graphics, Radeon Vega 10, means a discrete GPU is optional for basic tasks, but the PCIe lanes allow for a dedicated graphics card in larger laptops. The architecture is Zen+ (Picasso), and the production status is listed as Active, meaning it is still a current product for system builders.

The upgrade path is limited by the socket. Since FP5 is a mobile socket, users cannot swap processors easily; the chip is typically soldered to the motherboard. The 12 nm process and 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die indicate a mature design, but the lack of an unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) means no overclocking headroom. The release date of April 7, 2019, positions it as a slightly older part, yet the active production status suggests it remains relevant in budget and mid-range laptops. For compatibility, users must ensure their laptop motherboard supports DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3, which is standard for the era. The data shows a platform that prioritizes integration and efficiency over expandability, with the memory and PCIe support serving the needs of a thin-and-light design rather than a high-performance desktop replacement.