AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile processor from the 3000 series, built on the Zen+ architecture (codenamed Picasso) using a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, operating within a 35 W TDP. Benchmark data places this chip at the 46th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1989, indicating a mid-range position in the mobile landscape.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 3750H delivers a balanced but modest performance profile across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 6833 in multi-core and 964 in single-core tests. The multi-core result is substantially stronger when contextualized against the single-core figure, but the absolute numbers reveal a chip that sits in the entry-to-mid tier of mobile processors. The Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 3070 and a single-core score of 989.

Comparing the 3750H to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly clustered group. The processor's average benchmark score of 1989 is exactly equal to the Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4, which also scores 1989, resulting in a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B trails by a negligible 0.2%, with an average score of 1986. Two Intel mobile chips, the Core i5-1035G7 and Core i5-8300H, both score 1985, placing them 0.2% behind the 3750H as well. These deltas are within the margin of error for most benchmarking suites, suggesting that the 3750H offers performance parity with its direct competitors rather than a decisive advantage.

In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 2869 and single-core score of 404 reinforce the chip's positioning. The multi-core performance is roughly seven times the single-core figure, which is consistent with a 4-core/8-thread design that scales reasonably well under parallel loads but lacks the raw single-thread strength of newer architectures. The Cinebench R15 results, with 688 multi-core and 96 single-core, follow the same trend. The 3750H's multi-core advantage over its single-core performance is pronounced, but the absolute scores indicate that it will not challenge higher-tier mobile processors in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering or scientific computing.

The percentile ranking of 46% is telling: this processor outperforms slightly less than half of all CPUs in the database. That places it in the middle of the pack, with the nearest rivals all within 0.2% of its average score. The data suggests that for synthetic benchmarks, the 3750H is functionally indistinguishable from the Intel Core i5-8300H and i5-1035G7, making the choice between them dependent on other factors like platform features rather than raw computational throughput.

Who Should Consider It

The Ryzen 7 3750H is best suited for users with moderate computing demands. For office productivity tasks—word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and email—the 3750H provides ample performance. The single-core score of 964 in Cinebench R23 indicates that day-to-day applications, which typically rely on single-thread performance, will run smoothly without noticeable lag. The 4-core/8-thread configuration also handles multitasking well, allowing users to run multiple office applications simultaneously without significant degradation.

For content creation, the 3750H is a capable but not exceptional option. The multi-core score of 6833 in Cinebench R23 suggests that light photo editing, audio processing, and casual video editing are within its reach. Users who regularly work with 4K video or complex 3D renders will find the performance lacking, as the chip's multi-core throughput is modest by modern standards. However, for hobbyist-level creation or occasional editing tasks, the 3750H delivers acceptable results. The integrated Radeon Vega 10 graphics can assist with GPU-accelerated workloads, though the data does not include specific graphics benchmarks.

Gamers should approach the 3750H with measured expectations. The single-core performance is adequate for most games, which typically rely heavily on one or two threads. The Geekbench single-core score of 989 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 964 suggest that the processor will not bottleneck entry-level and mid-range graphics cards in most titles. However, the integrated Radeon Vega 10 graphics are not designed for high-end gaming, and the 35 W TDP limits sustained performance in thin-and-light laptops. For esports titles and older games at lower settings, the 3750H can provide a playable experience, but demanding AAA games will require a dedicated GPU.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 7 3750H uses the AMD Socket FP5, a mobile-specific socket that is not compatible with desktop platforms. The processor is based on the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, which is a refinement of the first-generation Zen design. It is manufactured on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 210 mm² and 4,940 million transistors. The chip includes 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache, providing a total cache hierarchy that is adequate for its performance class.

Memory support is limited to DDR4, operating on a dual-channel bus. The system does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for data integrity. The processor includes PCIe Gen 3 support, which is standard for its era but not the latest generation available in newer platforms. The integrated Radeon Vega 10 graphics provide display output and basic GPU acceleration, making the processor suitable for systems without a discrete graphics card.

The production status is listed as Active, meaning the processor is still in production. The release date was January 5, 2019, which places it in the early 2019 mobile lineup. The multiplier is not unlocked, so users cannot overclock the processor through conventional means. The part number is YM3700C4T4MFG. For upgrade paths, the Socket FP5 platform is mobile-specific, so users are generally limited to the processor that ships with the laptop. There is no path to a desktop socket upgrade, and the platform does not support newer processor generations without a motherboard change, which is not feasible in most laptop designs.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 3750H compare to the Intel Core i5-8300H?

A: The two processors are effectively tied in average benchmark scores. The Ryzen 7 3750H scores 1989, while the Core i5-8300H scores 1985, a delta of 0.2%. In practical terms, this means there is no meaningful performance difference in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 3750H?

A: The processor has a TDP of 35 W, which is typical for a mobile chip designed for thin-and-light laptops. This power envelope allows for adequate performance while maintaining reasonable thermal and battery characteristics.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 3750H support ECC memory?

A: No, the processor does not support ECC memory. It is limited to standard DDR4 memory operating on a dual-channel bus.

Q: Can I overclock the Ryzen 7 3750H?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The processor is designed for mobile platforms where overclocking is not a standard feature, and the 35 W TDP provides limited headroom for additional performance.

Q: What integrated graphics does the Ryzen 7 3750H include?

A: The processor includes Radeon Vega 10 integrated graphics. This provides basic display output and GPU acceleration, suitable for office tasks and light media consumption, but not for demanding gaming without a discrete GPU.

Q: When was the Ryzen 7 3750H released?

A: The release date was January 5, 2019. It is part of the 3000 series and remains in active production, according to the data.

How It Compares

The Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 is the closest rival, matching the Ryzen 7 3750H with an identical average benchmark score of 1989 and a 0% delta. This is a notable comparison because the Xeon is a desktop-class processor, yet the mobile Ryzen chip achieves parity in synthetic workloads. The Xeon's advantage lies in platform features like ECC support, but the 3750H offers comparable raw performance in a mobile form factor.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B trails by a mere 0.2%, scoring 1986 against the 3750H's 1989. Both processors share the same underlying Zen+ architecture, which explains the close results. The Embedded V1756B is designed for industrial and embedded applications, so the performance parity with the 3750H suggests that the mobile chip does not sacrifice computational capability for its lower-power design.

The Intel Core i5-1035G7 is another close competitor, scoring 1985 with a 0.2% delta. The i5-1035G7 is a newer 10nm Ice Lake processor, yet the older 12nm Zen+ chip matches its average performance. This indicates that the 3750H's architecture remains competitive for its class, though the i5-1035G7 may offer advantages in specific workloads or power efficiency that are not captured by the average score.

The Intel Core i5-8300H also scores 1985, placing it 0.2% behind the 3750H. This is a direct mobile competitor, and the results show that the two processors are effectively interchangeable in terms of synthetic benchmark performance. The i5-8300H is a 4-core/8-thread design as well, which explains the similar multi-threaded behavior. The choice between these two would come down to other platform factors, as the raw scores are indistinguishable.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Ryzen 7 3750H exhibits a significant disparity between its single-thread and multi-thread performance, which is characteristic of a 4-core/8-thread processor with a moderate boost clock. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 964, while the multi-core score is 6833, yielding a ratio of approximately 7.1:1. This ratio is close to the theoretical maximum of 8:1 for a processor with 8 threads, indicating that the chip scales well under parallel loads without significant contention for shared resources like L3 cache or memory bandwidth.

The single-thread performance, as measured by the Geekbench single-core score of 989, is modest by modern standards. This suggests that applications relying heavily on single-thread performance—such as legacy software, certain games, and some productivity tools—will see limited benefit from this processor. The boost clock of 4.00 GHz is respectable, but the older Zen+ architecture does not deliver the instructions-per-clock efficiency of newer designs like Zen 3 or Intel's 10nm and 7nm parts.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 3750H performs better relative to its peers. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 2869 and R15 multi-core score of 688 indicate that the processor can handle parallel tasks like video encoding, batch file processing, and compilation with reasonable efficiency. The multi-thread advantage over its single-thread performance is the chip's primary strength, making it better suited for productivity workloads that can utilize all 8 threads. However, the absolute multi-thread scores are not high enough to compete with higher-core-count processors, so the 3750H is best viewed as a balanced mobile option rather than a specialized workhorse.