AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B is a 4-core, 8-thread processor built on the Zen architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It operates at a base clock of 3.25 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz, with a 45 W TDP and integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics. Released on 2018-02-20 for the AMD Socket FP5, this embedded chip targets compact, power-conscious systems. Benchmark results place it at the 46th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1986 across tested workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The V1756B delivers consistent multi-threaded performance across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15, it scores 692 points multi-core and 97 points single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 2884 multi-core and 406 single-core. The latest R23 test yields 6867 multi-core and 969 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that scales well with thread count—multi-core scores are roughly seven times the single-core figures across all three versions, reflecting efficient use of its 8 threads, though not perfect linear scaling (which would be 8x).

Against its nearest rivals, the V1756B is effectively tied. The Intel Core i5-1035G7 averages 1985, with a delta of 0% from the V1756B’s 1986 average. The Intel Core i5-8300H also averages 1985, showing a 0.1% delta. The Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 and AMD Ryzen 7 3750H each average 1989, representing a -0.2% delta (meaning the V1756B is 0.2% behind). These differences are within noise, so the V1756B sits in a tight performance cluster with these four parts. Its 46th percentile ranking underscores that it is a mid-range performer, not a high-end workstation part but far from a low-end chip.

The benchmark scores also reveal that the V1756B’s performance is consistent across different Cinebench generations, with no unexpected regressions or gains. The R23 multi-core score of 6867 is particularly useful for comparing modern workloads, as R23 is widely used in current reviews. At this level, the V1756B can handle everyday productivity tasks, light content creation, and multi-threaded applications that do not demand extreme core counts.

Power and Thermals

With a TDP of 45 W, the V1756B sits in a low-power class for desktop processors. This is a deliberate design choice for embedded systems where thermal and power budgets are constrained. The 45 W TDP means that a modest cooling solution is sufficient—a small form factor air cooler or even a low-profile heatsink can keep it within operating limits. The chip’s 14 nm process and 210 mm² die size contribute to its efficiency, though the 4,950 million transistor count suggests a relatively dense design.

Because the V1756B is an embedded part, it is often paired with compact motherboards and enclosures. The 45 W TDP allows for passive cooling in some chassis designs, though active cooling is recommended for sustained loads. The socket FP5 is a BGA-type socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the board, which further emphasizes its role in fixed, low-maintenance systems. For builders, the practical implication is that they do not need to plan for a high-end liquid cooler or large tower air cooler; a basic 92 mm fan or similar will handle the heat output. The absence of a launch MSRP means we cannot comment on cost, but the power profile is clearly aimed at efficiency over raw performance.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The V1756B’s single-thread scores are modest: 97 in R15, 406 in R20, and 969 in R23. These numbers reflect the base clock of 3.25 GHz and boost of 3.60 GHz—a relatively narrow frequency range. The boost clock is only 10.8% higher than base, so the chip does not have a large frequency headroom for bursty single-threaded workloads. In lightly threaded applications, the CPU will likely hover near its boost clock, but it will not reach the high frequencies seen in desktop parts with higher TDPs.

Multi-threaded performance is where the V1756B shows its strength. The 8 threads allow it to process parallel workloads effectively, as evidenced by the multi-core scores being approximately 7.1x the single-core scores. This ratio holds across all three Cinebench versions, indicating that the scheduler and memory subsystem are well-balanced for thread scaling. For workloads that can utilize all threads—such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation—the V1756B will perform closer to its multi-core potential. However, for tasks that are inherently single-threaded, like many older games or certain office macros, the chip will rely on its 3.60 GHz boost, which is adequate but not exceptional.

The dual-channel DDR4 memory support (without ECC) provides sufficient bandwidth for the 8 threads, though the lack of ECC may be a consideration for mission-critical embedded applications. The L3 cache is 2 MB shared, which is modest by modern standards but appropriate for a 4-core Zen part. Overall, the single-thread vs. multi-thread split suggests that the V1756B is best suited for workloads that can be parallelized, while single-thread performance is adequate for general use but not a standout feature.

Who Should Consider It

The V1756B is a candidate for systems where power efficiency and integrated graphics are more important than raw performance. Its 45 W TDP and Radeon Vega 8 graphics make it suitable for compact desktops, thin clients, digital signage, and industrial PCs. For office productivity—word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing—the single-thread performance is more than sufficient, and the multi-thread capability handles background tasks smoothly.

Content creators working with lightweight projects may find the V1756B workable. The R23 multi-core score of 6867 suggests it can handle 1080p video editing or basic 3D rendering, though longer renders will be slower than on higher-core parts. Gamers should temper expectations: the integrated Vega 8 GPU can drive display output, but without dedicated graphics, modern 3D titles will be limited to low settings and resolutions. Esports and older games are more feasible, but the CPU’s 46th percentile ranking indicates it is not a gaming powerhouse.

For embedded and industrial applications, the active production status and 14 nm process ensure long-term availability. The lack of ECC memory support may be a drawback for some reliability-critical uses, but for general-purpose embedded computing, the V1756B offers a balanced feature set. It is not a part for enthusiasts seeking maximum frames per second or shortest render times, but it is a dependable workhorse for power-constrained systems.

How It Compares

Intel Core i5-1035G7: The V1756B and the i5-1035G7 are statistical twins, with the Intel part averaging 1985 versus the V1756B’s 1986—a delta of 0%. Both are 4-core/8-thread parts, but the i5-1035G7 is a mobile chip with a lower base clock and a higher boost. In practice, they will trade blows depending on the workload. The V1756B has a higher TDP (45 W vs. typically 15 W for the i5), which may allow it to sustain higher clocks under load, but the i5’s newer architecture might compensate. The data shows no meaningful performance difference.

Intel Core i5-8300H: The i5-8300H also averages 1985, with a delta of 0.1% relative to the V1756B. This is a 45 W mobile processor from Intel’s Coffee Lake family, often found in gaming laptops. The V1756B matches it almost exactly in Cinebench performance, despite being an embedded part. The i5-8300H has a higher boost clock (4.0 GHz) but the V1756B’s Zen architecture and 8 threads keep the overall scores level. For users comparing an embedded system to a laptop CPU, the V1756B holds its own.

Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4: The Xeon averages 1989, giving a delta of -0.2%—the V1756B is 0.2% behind. The Xeon is a server-oriented part with a 65 W TDP and support for ECC memory, which the V1756B lacks. Despite the Xeon’s enterprise features, the raw Cinebench performance is nearly identical. The V1756B’s lower TDP and integrated graphics make it a more power-efficient choice for embedded roles, while the Xeon offers ECC and possibly better stability for server workloads. The performance difference is negligible.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Another near tie: the Ryzen 7 3750H averages 1989, with a -0.2% delta. This is a mobile Ryzen part with 4 cores/8 threads and a 35 W TDP, also featuring Vega graphics. The V1756B is essentially on par with the 3750H, which is a common choice in budget gaming laptops. The 3750H has a higher boost clock (4.0 GHz) but the V1756B’s slightly higher base clock and 45 W TDP allow it to match performance. For embedded systems, the V1756B offers a similar experience to a mainstream laptop CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B?

A: The TDP is 45 W, which places it in a low-power class suitable for compact cooling solutions.

Q: Does the V1756B support ECC memory?

A: No, the memory support is DDR4 dual-channel without ECC functionality.

Q: What integrated graphics does the V1756B include?

A: It features Radeon Vega 8 graphics, which can drive display output without a discrete GPU.

Q: What socket does the V1756B use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket FP5, a BGA-style socket for embedded and compact systems.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for this processor?

A: It is fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 210 mm² and 4,950 million transistors.

Q: How does the V1756B compare to the Intel Core i5-8300H?

A: The average benchmark score of the V1756B is 1986, while the i5-8300H averages 1985, a delta of 0.1%. They are effectively identical in Cinebench performance.