AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100. However, the recorded data for the AMD processor provides a comprehensive picture of its performance profile, while the Qualcomm part currently has no benchmark scores listed in the database.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G, the Cinebench results indicate a substantial multi-threaded capability. The R15 multicore score of 1738 and R20 multicore score of 7244 show strong scaling across its 6 cores and 12 threads. The R23 multicore result of 17249 confirms this trend, delivering roughly seven times the single-core R23 score of 2435. That ratio suggests effective utilization of simultaneous multithreading in heavily threaded workloads.

Single-threaded performance for the AMD part is solid but not exceptional. The R15 single-core score of 245, R20 single-core score of 1022, and R23 single-core score of 2435 place it in the upper midrange of desktop processors. The PassMark single-thread score of 3241 reinforces this positioning. The PassMark multithread score of 19129, combined with the single-thread score, yields a scaling factor of roughly 5.9, which is consistent with a 6-core, 12-thread design under ideal conditions.

In specialized workloads, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G shows distinct strengths. The PassMark data compression score of 255608 is a strong result, indicating efficient execution of compression algorithms. Data encryption scores 15253, while extended instructions score 17944. Floating-point math reaches 38649, and integer math hits 67561. Random string sorting produces 25253. The physics score of 686 and prime number finding score of 49 are lower absolute numbers but reflect the specific nature of those tests.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 28032, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE with an average score of 28054 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i9-12900H at 28003 with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i5-14500T at 28065 with a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at 28128 with a delta of -0.3%. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G sits within a tight cluster, effectively matching these processors in overall average score.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, the database records no benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking of 50 indicates a mid-pack position, but without measured performance data, direct numerical comparison against the AMD part is not possible.

FAQ

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Qualcomm part, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD part scores 28032 on average. The Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28003, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128, which is 0.3% lower.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G ranks at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 does not support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The data presents two very different processors with different intended markets. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is a desktop part with a full set of recorded benchmarks, showing strong multi-threaded performance, a high percentile ranking, and close competition with several recent Intel and AMD parts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is a mobile part with no recorded benchmark scores, making direct performance comparison impossible from the database.

For users selecting based on measured performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G clearly offers verifiable results. Its 80th percentile ranking and average score of 28032 place it alongside the Intel Core i9-12900H and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435. The data shows that the AMD part excels in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17249 and a PassMark multithread score of 19129. Its single-thread performance is respectable as well, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3241.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, by contrast, has no performance measurements in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests a mid-tier position, but this is not supported by any benchmark data. The processor is designed for mobile use with a lower TDP of 30 watts, compared to the AMD part's 65 watts. It also has a higher memory bandwidth specification at 135.2 GB/s versus the AMD's 51.2 GB/s, but without benchmark scores, the practical impact of these specifications cannot be quantified.

The choice depends on the use case. For desktop workloads requiring proven multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is the only option with recorded data. For mobile applications where lower power consumption and higher memory bandwidth are priorities, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 may be relevant, but its performance remains unmeasured in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G uses 6 cores with 12 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses 8 cores with 8 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Qualcomm part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the AMD part is rated at 65 watts, while the Qualcomm part is rated at 30 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Qualcomm part uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.

ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Qualcomm processor. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Qualcomm part uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD part featuring Radeon Vega 7 and the Qualcomm part featuring Adreno X1-45.

The market segments are distinct: the AMD processor is a desktop part, while the Qualcomm processor is a mobile part. Release dates also differ, with the AMD processor released on 2024-05-06 and the Qualcomm processor released on 2024-09-02. Both parts are listed as Active in production status, and both have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process node at TSMC. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process node, also at TSMC. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen 5 generation, while the Qualcomm part belongs to the Snapdragon X Plus generation.

Cache configurations diverge sharply. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm processor has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's total transistor count is listed as 10,700 million, with a die size of 180 mm². The Qualcomm part has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

The AMD processor has 6 cores based on the Zen 3 architecture, which supports simultaneous multithreading, producing 12 threads. The Qualcomm processor has 8 cores with no recorded architecture name and supports 8 threads, indicating no simultaneous multithreading. The Qualcomm part also lacks a series designation, while the AMD part belongs to the 5000 series.

Memory architecture differs as well. The AMD part uses DDR4, while the Qualcomm part uses LPDDR5X. The AMD part's memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, while the Qualcomm part's is 135.2 GB/s. The AMD part supports ECC memory, the Qualcomm part does not. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Qualcomm part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes. These differences reflect the distinct design goals: the AMD part targets desktop compute with broad compatibility, while the Qualcomm part targets mobile efficiency with faster memory and newer PCIe generation.