AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500T and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G are both desktop processors that land in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, with average benchmark scores of 28065 and 28032, respectively. Despite this near-identical overall standing, the two chips diverge sharply in workload-specific performance, with the Intel part winning 14 of 17 head-to-head tests while the AMD part claims three significant victories. The data reveals a tale of two very different architectures: Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake design excels in parallel integer and physics workloads, while AMD’s 6-core Zen 3 chip dominates in the Cinebench R23 suite, suggesting substantial differences in how each processor handles sustained rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G with an average benchmark score of 28065 compared to 28032, a difference of just 0.1%. Both CPUs sit in the 80th percentile of all processors.

Q: How do the two chips compare in the Cinebench R23 multicore test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is the clear winner in this test, scoring 17249 versus Intel’s 11790. The delta is 31.6% in AMD’s favor, making it the largest single-test victory for either processor.

Q: What is the biggest performance advantage for the Intel Core i5-14500T?

A: Intel’s largest win comes in the Passmark physics test, where it scores 1288 against AMD’s 686, a 87.8% advantage. This is followed closely by a 65.3% lead in the Passmark find prime numbers test (81 vs 49).

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-14500T and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G list ECC memory support as a feature.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel’s core count is more than double AMD’s, yet the average scores are nearly identical.

Q: What are the memory support differences between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports only DDR4. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but AMD’s memory bandwidth is specified at 51.2 GB/s, whereas Intel’s is not listed in the data.

The Verdict

The data points to a split decision based on workload. For users prioritizing multi-threaded rendering in Cinebench R23, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is the definitive choice, delivering 17249 versus Intel’s 11790 — a 31.6% advantage that cannot be ignored for sustained CPU rendering tasks. However, the Intel Core i5-14500T is the more versatile performer across the broader benchmark suite, winning 14 of 17 tests and posting dominant leads in physics (87.8%), prime number finding (65.3%), and floating-point math (52.3%). The Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads clearly drive these wins, but the AMD part’s higher base clock of 3.90 GHz versus 1.70 GHz and its 7 nm TSMC process node contribute to its R23 superiority. For general productivity, integer math, and single-threaded Passmark tests, the Intel part is the stronger pick; for specific rendering workloads where R23 is the standard, the AMD chip wins outright. The near-identical average scores (28065 vs 28032) mean neither processor is a universal loser, but the workload distribution heavily favors Intel in most measured areas.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a lopsided contest, with the Intel Core i5-14500T winning 14 of 17 benchmarks. The most striking Intel victories include a 87.8% lead in Passmark physics (1288 vs 686), a 65.3% lead in Passmark find prime numbers (81 vs 49), and a 52.3% lead in Passmark floating-point math (58869 vs 38649). In integer math, Intel scores 80922 against AMD’s 67561, a 19.8% margin, and the same 19.8% delta appears in Passmark multithread (22910 vs 19129). Single-threaded Passmark performance also favors Intel, with a score of 3736 versus 3241, a 15.3% advantage. Cinebench R15 and R20 multicore tests show Intel ahead by 16.3% (2022 vs 1738) and 12.9% (8177 vs 7244), respectively, with the same 12.9% delta in R20 singlecore (1154 vs 1022). Smaller Intel wins include data compression (262417 vs 255608, 2.7%), data encryption (15410 vs 15253, 1%), and random string sorting (28462 vs 25253, 12.7%).

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G wins three tests, all in the Cinebench R23 suite. Its multicore score of 17249 dwarfs Intel’s 11790, a 31.6% difference. The singlecore R23 result follows the same pattern: AMD scores 2435 versus Intel’s 1838, a 24.5% lead. The third AMD win is in Passmark extended instructions, where it scores 17944 against Intel’s 16043, a 10.6% margin. Notably, the R23 multicore result is anomalous compared to the R15 and R20 multicore tests, where Intel leads by double digits — this suggests AMD’s Zen 3 architecture handles the R23 workload’s specific instruction mix far better than the older Cinebench versions, even with fewer cores. The extended instructions win reinforces that AMD’s core design has an edge in certain SIMD-heavy operations.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are dramatically different: Intel runs at 1.70 GHz, AMD at 3.90 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with Intel at 4.80 GHz and AMD at 4.40 GHz. Thermal design power also diverges significantly, with Intel rated at 35 W and AMD at 65 W. The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1700, AMD uses Socket AM4. Process nodes differ as well, with Intel on a 10 nm node from its own foundry and AMD on a 7 nm node from TSMC. Die size is similar — Intel at 215 mm², AMD at 180 mm² — but AMD lists 10,700 million transistors while Intel’s transistor count is not provided. Memory support separates the two: Intel accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, AMD only DDR4, though both use dual-channel buses. AMD specifies 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth; Intel does not list a figure. PCIe generations differ, with Intel supporting Gen 5 (16 lanes) and AMD Gen 3 (16 lanes). Integrated graphics are different models: Intel has UHD Graphics 770, AMD has Radeon Vega 7. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $232, while AMD’s launch MSRP is not listed. Both are desktop segments, active production, and have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two CPUs is fundamental. Intel’s Core i5-14500T is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. AMD’s Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G uses Zen 3 architecture under the codename Cezanne, fabricated on a 7 nm node by TSMC. Cache hierarchies differ notably: Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a smaller 16 MB L3 cache. The core counts are the most consequential difference — Intel’s 14 cores and 20 threads versus AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads — which explains Intel’s dominance in multi-threaded Passmark tests. However, AMD’s higher base clock (3.90 GHz vs 1.70 GHz) and larger process node advantage (7 nm vs 10 nm) appear to drive its R23 wins. The Cezanne codename indicates AMD’s design is optimized for that specific generation, while Intel’s Raptor Lake-R is a refresh of the 14th Gen family. Both support ECC memory, but Intel’s memory controller is more flexible with DDR4 and DDR5 support. The PCIe Gen 5 capability on Intel provides a bandwidth advantage for storage and GPU connectivity, though AMD’s Gen 3 implementation is more conservative. The integrated GPU differs, with Intel’s UHD Graphics 770 and AMD’s Radeon Vega 7, but no benchmark data is provided for either iGPU. The transistor count of 10,700 million on AMD’s die suggests a dense 7 nm design, while Intel’s 215 mm² die with unspecified transistors reflects its larger 10 nm process.