CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8324P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.65 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 128 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 180W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6780E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest
CORE SPECS 144 Cores / 144 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 108 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 330W
ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
4,894
7,431
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
690
1,049
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
20,393
30,963
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
2,879
4,371
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
48,557
73,723
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
6,855
N/A
passmark_data_compression
980,907
2,557,582
passmark_data_encryption
63,195
193,004
passmark_extended_instructions
60,304
114,008
passmark_find_prime_numbers
347
708
passmark_floating_point_math
139,022
433,862
passmark_integer_math
248,447
641,817
passmark_multithread
57,127
86,734
passmark_physics
4,637
10,951
passmark_random_string_sorting
113,610
326,954
passmark_single_thread
2,367
1,923
passmark_singlethread
2,367
1,923

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8324P vs Intel Xeon 6780E

the AMD AMD EPYC 8324P and 6780E (Intel) deliver almost identical processing power in the test. Any variations between these two sit inside testing variance, meaning either would meet consumers equally well. The balance leaves the selection nuanced. Alternative elements get particularly significant. Availability often influences the choice.

No CPU holds a definitive advantage in this matchup. the AMD AMD EPYC 8324P wins barely in some benchmarks, while 6780E (Intel) takes alternative tests. The trading trend demonstrates fundamental equivalence between them. Any differences are minor and possibly negligible in real-world tasks. Either offer solid capability.

Playing games benchmarks additionally show close scores between the AMD AMD EPYC 8324P and 6780E (Intel). Smoothness variations usually sit within single digits. Such marginal gaps are barely detectable during practical gaming sessions. Both chips achieve fluid gaming. Gamers can decide safely between them.

At the end of the day: the AMD AMD EPYC 8324P and 6780E (Intel) are tightly matched. No merits a definite preference over the rival. Allow cost and ecosystem choices shape your final choice. Both CPUs should serve you effectively. This is a safe decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8324P
6780E
Core Specs
Cores
32
144 +350.0%
Threads
64
144 +125.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.65
2.2 -17.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
3 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.65
2.2 -17.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
3 0.0%
Multiplier
26.5
22 -17.0%
SMP CPUs
1
2 +100.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
4 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
128 MB (shared)
108 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
180
330 +83.3%
Configurable TDP
155-225 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Sierra Forest
Codename
Siena
Sierra Forest
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
35,500 million
Die Size
4x 73 mm²
578 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$1895
$11350
Part Number
100-000001133
SRPG3
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
106°C
Bundled Cooler
None
None
View EPYC 8324P Details View Xeon 6780E Details