INTEL

Intel Xeon 6780E

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

144
Cores
144
Threads
3
GHz Boost
330W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

Intel
Cores / Threads 144C / 144T
Boost Clock 3 GHz
Base Clock 2.2 GHz
L3 Cache 108 MB (shared)
TDP 330W
Architecture Sierra Forest
Socket Intel Socket 4710
nm
Process 5 nm
Released Jun 2024

Intel Xeon 6780E Specifications

Xeon 6780E Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Xeon 6780E features 144 physical cores and 144 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
144
Threads
144
SMP CPUs
2

6780E Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon 6780E benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon 6780E by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.2 GHz
Boost Clock
3 GHz
Multiplier
22x

Intel's Xeon 6780E Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the 6780E processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon 6780E's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
4 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
108 MB (shared)

Sierra Forest Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Xeon 6780E is built on Intel's 5 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in 6780E incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Sierra Forest
Codename
Sierra Forest
Process Node
5 nm
Foundry
Intel
Die Size
578 mm²
Generation
Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Sierra Forest Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Xeon 6780E by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
FMA3
SHA
AES-NI
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Intel 64
VT-x
VT-d

6780E Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Xeon 6780E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 330W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
330W
Tj Max
106°C

Intel Socket 4710 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Xeon 6780E uses the Intel Socket 4710 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA18N
DDR5

Intel Socket 4710 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the 6780E define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon 6780E determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Xeon 6780E Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon 6780E by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Jun 2024
Launch Price
$11350
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
SRPG3
Bundled Cooler
None

Xeon 6780E Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Xeon 6780E performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #41 of 1967
7,431
50%
Max: 14,978
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Xeon 6780E handles tasks that can't be parallelized.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #36 of 1400
1,049
50%
Max: 2,114
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Xeon 6780E. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #41 of 1786
30,963
50%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Xeon 6780E. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #36 of 1776
4,371
50%
Max: 8,811
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Xeon 6780E after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #41 of 1938
73,723
50%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast Intel Xeon 6780E can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.

passmark_data_compression #17 of 696
2,557,582
45%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

Nearby Performers

#12 Intel Xeon 6960P
2,797,724
#13 AMD EPYC 9575F
2,773,634
#14 AMD EPYC 9684X
2,698,807
#15 AMD EPYC 9555P
2,639,400
#16 AMD EPYC 9565
2,579,631
#18 Intel Xeon 6781P
2,441,690
#19 Intel Xeon 6980P
2,364,519
#20 Intel Xeon 6774P
2,309,868
#21 AMD EPYC 9535
2,308,822
#22 Intel Xeon 696X
2,264,907

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast Intel Xeon 6780E can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.

passmark_data_encryption #9 of 696
193,004
55%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests Intel Xeon 6780E performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.

passmark_extended_instructions #33 of 696
114,008
30%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
383,298
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests Intel Xeon 6780E ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #35 of 696
708
29%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how Intel Xeon 6780E handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.

passmark_floating_point_math #22 of 696
433,862
38%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,153,453
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219

Nearby Performers

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast Intel Xeon 6780E processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.

passmark_integer_math #19 of 696
641,817
33%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

Nearby Performers

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests Intel Xeon 6780E across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.

passmark_multithread #35 of 696
86,734
51%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how Intel Xeon 6780E handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.

passmark_physics #23 of 696
10,951
39%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655
25,947
#3 AMD EPYC 9655P
25,847
#4 Intel Xeon 6960P
24,937
#5 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast Intel Xeon 6780E can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.

passmark_random_string_sorting #13 of 696
326,954
52%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Xeon 6780E across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_single_thread #676 of 696
1,923
38%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Xeon 6780E across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_singlethread #676 of 696
1,923
38%
Max: 5,087

About Intel Xeon 6780E

The Intel Xeon 6780E is a 144-core, 144-thread server processor built on Intel’s Sierra Forest architecture, targeting the high-density compute segment of the data center market. It operates at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz, with a 330 W TDP that places it firmly in the flagship power envelope. As a production-active part with a launch MSRP of $11350, it is positioned for scale-out workloads where core count trumps raw frequency.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for the Intel Xeon 6780E is sparse, with no recorded average benchmark score and a percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs. This percentile figure indicates that the processor sits at the median of the database’s tracked CPUs, but this should be interpreted cautiously given the absence of concrete performance scores. The lack of nearest rivals in the dataset further complicates direct comparison, meaning the performance analysis must rely on architectural characteristics rather than measured deltas.

The 144-core configuration is the defining feature of this chip. With 144 threads and no hyper-threading, each core is dedicated to a single thread, which is a deliberate design choice for energy efficiency in throughput-oriented tasks. The 108 MB of shared L3 cache provides a substantial pool for data reuse across the many cores, while the 4 MB L2 cache per module helps reduce latency for frequently accessed data. The 2.20 GHz base clock is modest, but the 3.00 GHz boost clock allows for bursts of higher performance when thermal headroom permits.

In the absence of direct rival scores, the architectural data suggests this processor is engineered for parallel workloads that scale linearly with core count. The 5 nm process node from Intel enables the integration of 144 cores on a 578 mm² die, which is a significant density achievement. The 50th percentile ranking implies that in the broader CPU landscape, this chip is neither a standout nor a laggard, but this is likely skewed by the inclusion of consumer processors with far fewer cores in the database.

Power and Thermals

The Intel Xeon 6780E carries a TDP of 330 W, which classifies it as a high-power server part requiring robust cooling solutions. This power envelope is typical for processors with extreme core counts, as the energy required to feed 144 cores at 2.20 GHz base frequency is substantial. The TDP figure dictates that this chip cannot be cooled by standard air coolers; instead, it demands high-end server cooling infrastructure, such as large heatsinks with high-static-pressure fans or liquid cooling loops.

The power characteristics align with the Sierra Forest architecture’s focus on efficiency per watt rather than raw single-core speed. The modest base clock of 2.20 GHz is a direct trade-off to keep the 330 W TDP within manageable thermal limits while operating all 144 cores simultaneously. When the boost clock of 3.00 GHz is engaged, it is likely on a subset of cores, as sustaining all 144 cores at that frequency would exceed the thermal design point. The 5 nm process node helps mitigate power draw, but the sheer transistor count on the 578 mm² die means heat density is a primary concern for system integrators.

For platform designers, the 330 W TDP necessitates careful attention to VRM (voltage regulator module) design and chassis airflow. The data shows this is not a drop-in upgrade for existing mid-range servers; it requires a platform engineered for the highest power tier. Thermal management becomes a primary consideration in rack density planning, as the heat output of multiple 6780E processors in a single chassis can overwhelm standard cooling systems.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Xeon 6780E uses the Intel Socket 4710, which is dedicated to the Sierra Forest-SP generation of Xeon 6 processors. This socket is not backward compatible with previous Xeon platforms, requiring a new motherboard for adoption. Memory support is limited to DDR5, operating on an eight-channel bus that delivers a theoretical memory bandwidth of 409.6 GB/s. This bandwidth is critical for feeding the 144 cores, as memory-bound workloads can easily become starved without sufficient channel width.

ECC memory is supported, which is a mandatory feature for server reliability. The eight-channel configuration is standard for high-end Xeon parts, allowing for large memory capacities with error correction. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 88 lanes available from the CPU itself, providing ample connectivity for high-speed accelerators, NVMe storage, and network interface cards. This lane count is generous, enabling multiple dual-slot GPUs or a dense array of storage devices without needing a separate PCIe switch.

The upgrade path for the 6780E is constrained by its socket and generation. Since it is part of the Xeon 6 family, future upgrades within the same platform would be limited to other Sierra Forest-SP parts, assuming they share the same socket. The architecture is specifically designed for cloud and hyperscale workloads, with a focus on core density rather than per-core features. The 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and eight-channel DDR5 support indicate a platform built for I/O-intensive applications, but the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required for any display output or GPU-accelerated compute.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals array is empty in the fact pack, which makes direct competitive positioning impossible. This absence of data means that no rival products with scores or deltaPct values are available for comparison. In this context, the analysis must focus on the 6780E’s absolute capabilities rather than relative performance against specific competitors.

Without rival data, the 6780E’s position in the market is defined by its 144-core design. Processors with similar core counts, such as AMD’s EPYC line, typically offer comparable thread counts but with different architectural trade-offs. The Sierra Forest architecture is optimized for efficiency cores, which generally have lower per-core performance than performance cores but allow for higher core densities. This suggests that the 6780E would outperform high-core-count rivals in parallel workloads that utilize all threads, but may lag in lightly-threaded tasks.

The 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a useful anchor point. This indicates that in the database’s broader collection, the 6780E is exactly average, but this is misleading because the database likely includes many consumer and mobile processors. Among server CPUs, the 6780E’s core count places it in the upper echelon. The launch MSRP of $11350 also signals a premium product aimed at enterprise buyers, not the broader enthusiast market.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Intel Xeon 6780E exhibits a pronounced bias toward multi-threaded performance. With 144 threads and a base clock of 2.20 GHz, the per-core performance is modest by design. The boost clock of 3.00 GHz provides a 36% frequency uplift over the base, but this is still low compared to consumer processors that can reach 5.0 GHz or higher. The architecture’s focus is on maximizing aggregate throughput across all cores rather than optimizing for a single-threaded workload.

In real-world terms, this means the 6780E excels in workloads that can utilize many threads simultaneously, such as database processing, scientific simulations, and virtualization hosts running numerous virtual machines. The 108 MB L3 cache is a critical asset for these workloads, as it reduces the need to access slower DDR5 memory. The 4 MB L2 cache per module (with each module containing multiple cores) helps maintain data locality for frequently used instruction and data sets.

Conversely, the 6780E is not suited for single-threaded applications that require high clock speeds. The 2.20 GHz base clock and 3.00 GHz boost clock are significantly lower than flagship consumer parts, meaning tasks like legacy software, some gaming, or lightly-threaded scripting would see below-average performance. The lack of hyper-threading further emphasizes the efficiency-core design, as each physical core operates independently without the extra logical thread that could improve single-core responsiveness.

The split between single-thread and multi-thread behavior is stark. The 144 threads provide 144-way parallelism, which is exceptional for server workloads, but the per-thread performance is limited by the low clock speeds and efficiency-oriented core design. This makes the 6780E a specialized tool for scale-out deployments where core count directly translates to throughput, not a general-purpose processor for diverse workloads. The data supports the conclusion that this chip is designed for specific high-density compute environments, and its performance profile reflects that singular focus.

Compare Xeon 6780E with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs