Intel Core i3-13100TE vs Intel Core i5-1240P Comparison

The Verdict

The data splits this comparison into two distinct camps. The Intel Core i5-1240P wins the majority of the recorded Cinebench tests, taking 5 out of 6 head-to-head matchups. It is the clear choice for anyone prioritizing raw throughput in older or mixed rendering workloads, especially in the R15 and R20 suites. The Intel Core i3-13100TE, however, posts a significant victory in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, which is often the most demanding and representative of modern multi-threaded rendering. If your primary application is heavily reliant on the R23 metric, the i3-13100TE is the better pick. For broader, legacy, or single-threaded performance, the i5-1240P is the superior option. The overall average benchmark scores are close, with the i5-1240P at 3202 and the i3-13100TE at 3111, placing them in the 53rd and 52nd percentiles of all CPUs respectively.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and target different physical designs. The i5-1240P is based on Alder Lake architecture, using the Alder Lake-P codename, and is built for the mobile market segment on the Intel BGA 1744 socket. In contrast, the i3-13100TE uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, and is designed for desktop systems on the Intel Socket 1700. Both are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node, but the die sizes differ: the i5-1240P measures 217 mm², while the i3-13100TE is smaller at 163 mm².

Core counts are a major differentiator. The i5-1240P provides 12 cores and 16 threads, while the i3-13100TE offers only 4 cores and 8 threads. This explains the i5's dominance in most multi-threaded tests. Both share the same cache layout per core: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2, with a shared 12 MB L3 cache. Integrated graphics also differ: the i5-1240P uses Iris Xe 80EU, while the i3-13100TE pairs with UHD Graphics 730.

A notable feature split exists in platform support. The i5-1240P supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), whereas the i3-13100TE supports the newer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Memory support is identical in terms of type (DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel), but the i3-13100TE adds ECC memory support, which the i5-1240P lacks. The i5-1240P was released in February 2022, while the i3-13100TE followed in January 2023.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a clear pattern of the i5-1240P leading in most tests, with one notable exception. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-1240P scores 1566.5 against 1013, a 54.6% advantage. The single-core R15 test is even more lopsided: 226 versus 142, a 59.2% lead for the i5. These are the largest margins in the entire comparison.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-1240P continues its dominance. The multicore result is 5632 versus 4222, a 33.4% win. The single-core R20 test shows 795 against 595, a 33.6% advantage. These results indicate that the i5-1240P's higher core count and boost clock of 4.40 GHz provide a substantial edge in these workloads.

The single-core Cinebench R23 test follows the same trend, with the i5-1240P scoring 1600 and the i3-13100TE scoring 1419, a 12.8% lead for the i5. This is a smaller margin than in older R15 tests, suggesting the i3-13100TE's newer Raptor Lake architecture narrows the gap in more modern single-threaded workloads.

The critical reversal occurs in Cinebench R23 multicore. Here, the i3-13100TE scores 10054, while the i5-1240P scores 9392, giving the i3 a 6.6% victory. This is the only test the i3 wins, and it is a significant one. The i3-13100TE's base clock of 2.40 GHz and lower core count somehow translates into better sustained performance in this specific workload, likely due to the newer architecture and desktop-grade power envelope.

Specification Differences

Directly comparing the two processors, the following fields differ:

• Cores: 12 (i5-1240P) versus 4 (i3-13100TE)
• Threads: 16 versus 8
• Base Clock: 1700.00 MHz versus 2400.00 MHz
• Boost Clock: 4.40 GHz versus 4.10 GHz
• TDP: 28 W versus 35 W
• Socket: Intel BGA 1744 versus Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Alder Lake versus Raptor Lake
• Codename: Alder Lake-P versus Raptor Lake-S
• Generation: Core i5 (Alder Lake-P) versus Core i3 (Raptor Lake)
• Die Size: 217 mm² versus 163 mm²
• ECC Memory: false versus true
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) versus Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: Iris Xe 80EU versus UHD Graphics 730
• Market Segment: Mobile versus Desktop
• Release Date: 2022-02-22 versus 2023-01-03
• Part Number: SRLD9 versus SRMFT

The base clock difference is notable: the i3-13100TE runs at 2.40 GHz, which is 700 MHz higher than the i5-1240P's 1.70 GHz. Yet the i5-1240P has a higher boost clock at 4.40 GHz versus 4.10 GHz. The TDP figures show the i3-13100TE draws more power (35 W) than the i5-1240P (28 W), which is counterintuitive given the core count difference but reflects the desktop versus mobile design philosophy.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: Based on the recorded Cinebench tests, the Intel Core i5-1240P wins all three single-core benchmarks. It leads by 59.2% in R15, 33.6% in R20, and 12.8% in R23.

Q: Does the i3-13100TE win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the i3-13100TE wins the Cinebench R23 multicore test, scoring 10054 compared to the i5-1240P's 9392, a 6.6% advantage. This is the only head-to-head test it wins.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i5-1240P has an average benchmark score of 3202, while the i3-13100TE scores 3111. The i5 is also in the 53rd percentile of all CPUs, while the i3 is in the 52nd percentile.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: No, the i5-1240P does not support ECC memory. The i3-13100TE does support ECC memory, which is a key differentiator for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

Q: What are the socket requirements for each?

A: The i5-1240P uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform. The i3-13100TE uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform. These are not interchangeable.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The i5-1240P has 12 cores and 16 threads. The i3-13100TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the i5 a substantial advantage in heavily threaded workloads, as reflected in the R15 and R20 multicore results.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-1240P is the winner for:

• Multi-threaded workloads in older Cinebench versions (R15 and R20), with 54.6% and 33.4% leads respectively.
• All single-core tests, particularly the R15 test where it beats the i3-13100TE by 59.2%.
• Mobile or compact systems, given its BGA socket and lower 28 W TDP.
• Applications that benefit from the Iris Xe 80EU integrated graphics.
• General productivity where the 12-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel tasks efficiently.

The Intel Core i3-13100TE is the winner for:

• The most modern multi-threaded rendering test (Cinebench R23 multicore), where it outperforms the i5-1240P by 6.6%.
• Desktop builds using the standard Socket 1700 platform.
• Systems requiring ECC memory support.
• Workloads that prefer higher base clock speeds (2.40 GHz versus 1.70 GHz) and the newer Raptor Lake architecture.
• Users who want PCIe Gen 5 support, even with fewer lanes (16 versus 20).

The choice hinges on workload priority. The i5-1240P is the more versatile processor for most benchmark scenarios, while the i3-13100TE is a specialist that excels in the specific, modern R23 multicore test and offers platform features like ECC and PCIe Gen 5 that the mobile i5 cannot match.