AMD Ryzen 5 5625U vs Intel Core i5-1240P Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data paints a consistently one-sided picture in the head-to-head comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U and the Intel Core i5-1240P. Across all four shared benchmark tests, the Intel part emerges victorious, though the margin varies significantly depending on the workload type.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Core i5-1240P scores 1566.5 against the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U's 1447, a 7.6% advantage. This is the narrowest gap in the entire comparison, suggesting that when the thread count is relatively modest, the AMD chip's efficiency can keep it within striking distance. The single-core result in the same test is even closer: 226 for Intel versus 223 for AMD, a mere 1.3% difference. That margin is almost negligible and indicates that both processors deliver fundamentally similar per-thread performance in this older benchmark.

The picture shifts more decisively in the newer Cinebench R23 tests. In the multicore run, the Intel chip posts 9392 versus AMD's 8290, expanding the lead to 11.7%. The single-core test shows the largest disparity of all: Intel scores 1600 while AMD manages 1379, a 13.8% gap. This is notable because Cinebench R23 single-core is often viewed as a strong indicator of general responsiveness and lightly threaded application performance. The data here suggests Intel's architecture holds a clearer advantage in that specific metric.

Looking at the overall benchmark averages, the Intel Core i5-1240P records 3202 against the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U's 3096, a difference of roughly 3.4%. Both processors sit in similar percentile territory: the AMD chip ranks at the 52nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel chip ranks at the 53rd. That near-identical percentile placement is a useful context clue; while the Intel part wins every direct head-to-head test, the aggregate picture places both in the same performance tier.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark results, the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U does not win any of the four recorded head-to-head tests. Its wins are zero, while Intel's tally stands at four. That said, the data invites a more nuanced reading of what "winning" means in practice.

The Intel Core i5-1240P's strongest area is clearly Cinebench R23 single-core performance, where its 13.8% lead over the AMD chip is the most pronounced gap in the dataset. For workloads that depend heavily on single-threaded speed, such as certain legacy applications, lightly threaded productivity tools, or games that cannot scale across many cores, this advantage would likely translate into tangible real-world benefits.

The multicore results are somewhat more complex. In Cinebench R15 multicore, Intel leads by only 7.6%, while in R23 multicore the lead grows to 11.7%. The R23 test is generally more demanding and scales better with additional cores and threads. Since the Intel part offers 12 cores and 16 threads versus the AMD part's 6 cores and 12 threads, the widening gap in the more intensive test aligns with the core count disparity. For sustained multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the Intel processor's additional cores appear to provide a meaningful advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U, despite losing all direct comparisons, still records respectable absolute scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore result of 8290 and single-core result of 1379 are not weak numbers in isolation. The data suggests that for users whose workloads are moderate and who do not heavily stress all available threads, the AMD chip would still deliver competent performance, just not at the level of its Intel competitor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U is built on TSMC's 7 nm process and uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo. It belongs to the 5000 series and is specifically described in the database as Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)). The Intel Core i5-1240P, by contrast, uses Intel's 10 nm process and the Alder Lake architecture, codenamed Alder Lake-P, listed as Core i5 (Alder Lake-P).

The core configurations differ dramatically. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, all presumably based on the same Zen 3 design. Intel provides 12 cores and 16 threads, which in the Alder Lake-P design implies a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores, although the database does not explicitly break down the core types. The thread count difference is notable: Intel offers 16 threads versus AMD's 12, despite having twice the core count. This indicates that not all Intel cores are hyper-threaded, whereas all AMD cores appear to be.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD chip features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 80 KB of L1 per core, a substantially larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but only 12 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core L2 on Intel could benefit certain workloads that exhibit high cache locality, while AMD's larger shared L3 pool could aid in multi-core scenarios where data is shared across cores.

The memory support differs as well. AMD supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. Notably, AMD supports ECC memory while Intel does not, which could be relevant for users prioritizing data integrity.

PCIe capabilities favor Intel: Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) versus AMD's Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a potential advantage in bandwidth for any external devices or accelerators that use PCIe lanes.

The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon Vega 7, while Intel uses Iris Xe 80EU. The database does not provide benchmark comparisons for these iGPUs, so no performance conclusions can be drawn from the recorded data.

Physical specifications show Intel's die size at 217 mm² versus AMD's 180 mm², though AMD's transistor count is recorded at 10,700 million while no transistor figure is available for Intel. The TDP values differ as well: AMD at 15 W versus Intel at 28 W, which could have thermal and battery-life implications in mobile devices, though the database does not include battery or thermal measurements.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points decisively toward the Intel Core i5-1240P as the stronger performer in this comparison. It wins all four recorded head-to-head tests, with advantages ranging from a narrow 1.3% in Cinebench R15 single-core to a substantial 13.8% in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its multicore leads of 7.6% and 11.7% in the two R15 and R23 tests respectively reinforce the pattern.

The Intel part also offers more cores and threads, a larger L2 cache, support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. These architectural advantages align with its benchmark victories. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U counters with a lower TDP, ECC memory support, and a smaller die size, but none of these features translate into a recorded benchmark win.

For users whose priority is maximum performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, the data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-1240P. For users who might prioritize lower power consumption or the availability of ECC memory, the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U remains a defensible choice, but the recorded benchmarks do not show it outperforming the Intel part in any measured test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core i5-1240P scores 1600 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U scores 1379, giving Intel a 13.8% lead.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor offer?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-1240P has 12 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-1240P does not.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two mobile processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U has a TDP of 15 W, while the Intel Core i5-1240P has a TDP of 28 W.

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Core i5-1240P wins all 4 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core i5-1240P supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | Intel Core i5-1240P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 1700.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Alder Lake |

| Codename | Barcelo | Alder Lake-P |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 217 mm² |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | Iris Xe 80EU |

| Release Date | 2022-01-05 | 2022-02-22 |

| Part Number | 100-000000583 | SRLD9 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 3096 | 3202 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 52 | 53 |