Intel Core 9 273PE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core 9 273PE, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. The Intel part shows strong results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31,288 points in multi-core and 4,417 points in single-core. The R20 run shows 13,140 multi-core and 1,855 single-core, while R15 lands at 3,153 multi-core and 445 single-core.

PassMark results reinforce the Intel chip's position. The multi-thread score is 36,810, with integer math at 139,410 and floating-point math at 107,884. Data compression reaches 405,885, and data encryption hits 22,719. Extended instructions score 24,630, while random string sorting posts 45,098. Find prime numbers is the outlier at 203, and physics comes in at 3,120. The single-thread PassMark score is 3,650.

The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 49,845, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show how competitive this score is. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 trails by just 0.1% with an average score of 49,796. The Intel Core i5-14600KF sits 0.9% behind at 49,394. The Intel Core i9-13980HX leads by 1.1% with 50,398, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is 1.2% ahead at 50,448. These are tight margins, indicating the Core 9 273PE sits squarely in a dense performance cluster.

Since the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head section must rely on architectural and specification data alone. The recorded data shows a clear asymmetry: one processor has extensive measured results, the other has none. That absence is itself a notable fact for buyers tracking mobile silicon.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply at the architectural level. The Intel Core 9 273PE uses a 10 nm process built by Intel, while the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The Intel chip is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 9 generation. The Qualcomm part uses the Glymur codename, part of the Snapdragon X2 Elite generation.

Core counts differ in a meaningful way. The Intel processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, meaning each core supports two threads via Hyper-Threading. The Snapdragon part has 18 cores and 18 threads, so it operates with one thread per core. This suggests different design philosophies: Intel leans on simultaneous multithreading, Qualcomm relies on a higher physical core count.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, a wide range that indicates aggressive single-core boosting. The Snapdragon part runs at a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, a much narrower range. The Qualcomm chip's base clock is nearly double the Intel chip's base clock, but its maximum boost is significantly lower. This points to different thermal and power envelopes, though the Snapdragon's TDP is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon processor has 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and only 9 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip's L3 advantage is substantial, while the Snapdragon's per-core L1 is much larger. The die size for the Snapdragon is recorded at 220 mm², while the Intel die size is not listed.

Memory support differs completely. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Snapdragon part supports LPDDR5X in a triple-channel configuration with 228.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a major bandwidth gap, likely tied to the Qualcomm chip's mobile integration strategy. The Intel chip supports ECC memory; the Snapdragon does not. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2343, confirming the former is a desktop part and the latter is mobile.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are present on both: Intel uses UHD Graphics 730, Qualcomm uses Adreno X2-90. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549; no MSRP is recorded for the Snapdragon. The Intel chip was released on 2026-03-08, and the Snapdragon on 2026-04-05, less than a month apart.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data only covers the Intel Core 9 273PE, so any victory for the Snapdragon must be inferred from its specifications. In raw benchmark scores, the Intel part wins every recorded category because it is the only one with scores. Its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database. The dense rival cluster around it, with deltas under 1.2%, shows that this performance tier is highly contested.

For desktop workloads, the Intel chip's 24 threads and 36 MB of shared L3 give it a structural advantage in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, code compilation, and scientific computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,288 reflects that capability. The 5.70 GHz boost clock supports strong single-thread performance, confirmed by the 4,417 R23 single-core score and the PassMark single-thread score of 3,650.

The Snapdragon's strengths are architectural rather than measured. Its 3 nm process and 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth position it for mobile workloads where power efficiency and memory throughput matter. The triple-channel LPDDR5X support is a clear differentiator. The 4.45 GHz base clock across 18 cores suggests sustained multi-core performance without relying on boost behavior. The 16 MB of L2 per module could benefit workloads that fit within that local cache.

The production status for both is Active, and both are multiplier-unlocked false, so neither offers overclocking headroom through an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part's market segment is Desktop; the Snapdragon's is Mobile. That alone dictates where each processor wins: the Intel chip is built for socketed desktop systems, the Qualcomm chip for integrated mobile platforms.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core 9 273PE in multi-core workloads than its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has an average benchmark score of 49,845. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, scores 49,796, which is 0.1% behind. The Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.9% behind at 49,394.

Q: Does the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the Snapdragon X2E-94-100, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. All recorded performance data belongs to the Intel Core 9 273PE.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads, one thread per core. The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, two threads per core.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 supports LPDDR5X in a triple-channel configuration with 228.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Intel Core 9 273PE and the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 have multiplierUnlocked set to false, meaning neither supports multiplier-based overclocking.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PE | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 |

|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 18 |

| Threads | 24 | 18 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 4.45 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.70 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | Not recorded |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Glymur |

| Generation | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 220 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB (per module) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 9 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 228.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X2-90 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-05 |

| Launch MSRP | $549 | Not recorded |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear decision path for each use case. The Intel Core 9 273PE is the only one of the two with measured performance, and those measurements are strong. Its 90th percentile ranking, combined with a 24-thread configuration and 36 MB of L3 cache, makes it suitable for desktop workloads that demand parallel throughput. The 5.70 GHz boost clock and top-tier single-core scores in the 90th percentile range cover single-threaded responsiveness. The launch MSRP of $549 places it in the desktop enthusiast tier, though no pricing comparison to the Snapdragon is possible since no MSRP is recorded for the latter.

The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 cannot be evaluated on benchmark merit because no scores exist in the database. Its case rests on specifications alone. The 3 nm process, 18 cores, 4.45 GHz base clock, 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and triple-channel LPDDR5X support describe a mobile processor engineered for bandwidth-heavy and power-sensitive environments. The 9 MB of shared L3 is small relative to the Intel part, but the 16 MB L2 per module may compensate for workloads with high locality.

For a desktop builder seeking a socketed processor with verified performance data, the Intel Core 9 273PE is the only viable choice between these two. For a mobile platform designer prioritizing process efficiency and memory bandwidth, the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 offers a compelling specification sheet, pending benchmark validation. The benchmark database currently provides no evidence of how the Snapdragon performs in practice, so any claim of superiority for that chip would be speculative. The Intel part's recorded scores, tight rival margins, and active production status make it the defensible pick for anyone needing measured results today.