AMD Ryzen 5 40 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full set of recorded measurements for the AMD Ryzen 5 40, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no benchmark entries logged at this time. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. Instead, the analysis must rely on the existing Ryzen 5 40 results and the architectural specifications of the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 to establish expected performance boundaries.

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 4841 and a single-core score of 1150. In Cinebench R15, it records 790 for multi-core and 165.5 for single-core. These figures place the chip at the 70th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score sits at 15882. The nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 75F3 with an average score of 15859 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U at 15910 (0.2% lower), the AMD EPYC 9354P at 15826 (0.4% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9334 at 15940 (0.4% lower). The Ryzen 5 40 effectively sits within a tight cluster of server and mobile parts, with all deltas under half a percent.

Passmark results for the AMD chip show integer math at 31598, floating point math at 15194, and extended instructions at 6437. Data compression reaches 141533, while data encryption records 6646. Random string sorting completes at 15124. The multi-threaded Passmark score is 9341, and the single-thread score is 2477. Prime number finding is notably low at 20, and physics simulation records 432.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no recorded scores, so the database cannot confirm any specific win for either part. However, the structural differences between the two are substantial. The Snapdragon uses 18 cores with 18 threads, a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Ryzen 5 40 uses 4 cores with 8 threads, a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. On paper, the core count and clock rates suggest the Snapdragon should produce higher multi-threaded throughput, but no measured data exists to verify this.

The Snapdragon also has a significantly larger cache hierarchy: 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and 9 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen 5 40 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. Memory bandwidth favors the Snapdragon at 228.6 GB/s over the Ryzen's 88.0 GB/s, and the Snapdragon uses triple-channel LPDDR5X while the Ryzen uses dual-channel LPDDR5. These figures suggest the Snapdragon has more headroom for data-intensive workloads, but again the absence of benchmark scores leaves this as an unverified expectation.

The Ryzen 5 40's nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow band, indicating that its performance profile is well understood and consistent. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100, with a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, has no comparable entries. The database shows zero wins for either part in the head-to-head section, which confirms that no measured comparison exists yet.

Given the lack of direct measurements, the only definitive statement from the data is that the Ryzen 5 40 has a complete benchmark record while the Snapdragon does not. Any claim about which chip wins in a given test cannot be supported by recorded numbers.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Ryzen 5 40 is the only part with verified performance results. Its 70th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 15882 place it in the upper-middle range of all CPUs in the database. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100, with no benchmark scores, cannot be positioned relative to the Ryzen or any other chip based on measurements.

Buyers or system integrators who require confirmed performance data should select the AMD Ryzen 5 40. It has a complete set of Cinebench and Passmark results that show consistent behavior across single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its average score, which indicates that its performance tier is stable and predictable.

The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 should only be considered if its architectural specifications alone are sufficient for a decision. It offers 18 cores, a higher boost clock, larger caches, and triple-channel memory support. These features may appeal to workloads that scale with core count and memory bandwidth, but the database has no evidence to confirm how those features translate into actual performance.

For verified results, the AMD Ryzen 5 40 is the clear choice. For unverified potential based on specifications, the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 remains an unknown quantity.

FAQ

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Snapdragon X2E-94-100. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 15 benchmark entries across Cinebench and Passmark tests.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 40 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The Ryzen 5 40 has an average benchmark score of 15882. The AMD EPYC 75F3 scores 15859 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U scores 15910 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 9354P scores 15826 (0.4% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9334 scores 15940 (0.4% higher). All deltas are under one percent.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads. The Snapdragon has no hyperthreading equivalent, while the Ryzen uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Snapdragon also has a higher base clock at 4.45 GHz compared to the Ryzen's 2.80 GHz.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 supports LPDDR5X over a triple-channel bus with 228.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 40 supports LPDDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 88.0 GB/s. The Snapdragon offers roughly 2.6 times the memory bandwidth based on the recorded figures.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 40 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC. Both chips are fabricated by TSMC, but on different nodes.

Specification Differences

The database records several direct specification differences between the two parts.

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads. Base clocks are 2.80 GHz for the Ryzen and 4.45 GHz for the Snapdragon. Boost clocks are 4.30 GHz and 4.70 GHz respectively. The Ryzen has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Snapdragon has no TDP recorded.

The Ryzen uses AMD Socket FT6, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2343. The Ryzen's part number is listed as unknown, while the Snapdragon's part number is X2E94100. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

Memory support differs: the Ryzen uses LPDDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 88.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Snapdragon uses LPDDR5X over a triple-channel bus with 228.6 GB/s bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs: the Ryzen has Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon has Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ: the Ryzen uses Radeon 610M, while the Snapdragon uses Adreno X2-90.

Release dates differ: the Ryzen was released on 2025-09-30, while the Snapdragon was released on 2026-04-05. Both are listed as Active in production status and both target the Mobile market segment.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Mendocino. It uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC and has a die size of 100 mm². The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses the codename Glymur, belongs to the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process node from TSMC with a die size of 220 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Ryzen has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon has 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and 9 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon's L2 cache is 32 times larger per module in raw terms, and its L3 is more than double the Ryzen's.

The Ryzen's architecture is explicitly listed as Zen 2, while the Snapdragon's architecture field is null in the database. The Snapdragon's generation is listed as Snapdragon X2 (Elite), which indicates a different design family entirely. The Ryzen is a low-power mobile processor with a 15-watt TDP, while the Snapdragon has no TDP recorded, though its 18-core configuration suggests a different power envelope.

Both chips use TSMC as the foundry, but on different nodes. The Ryzen's 6 nm node is older and less dense than the Snapdragon's 3 nm node. Die size reflects this: the Snapdragon is 220 mm², more than double the Ryzen's 100 mm², despite using a smaller process node. This indicates a much larger transistor budget on the Snapdragon, though the transistor counts are not recorded in the database.

Memory controller architecture also differs. The Ryzen uses a dual-channel LPDDR5 controller, while the Snapdragon uses a triple-channel LPDDR5X controller. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s is roughly 2.6 times the Ryzen's 88.0 GB/s, which reflects both the wider bus and the faster memory type.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has verified wins in every recorded benchmark category because it is the only chip with scores in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 4841 and single-core score of 1150 establish a baseline for mobile processors in the 70th percentile. Passmark results show solid integer math at 31598, floating point math at 15194, and data compression at 141533. These numbers indicate a balanced performer for general-purpose mobile computing tasks that do not require extreme core counts.

The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 cannot claim any measured wins because no benchmark scores exist. However, its specifications suggest potential advantages in specific workload categories. The 18-core configuration with 18 threads and a 4.70 GHz boost clock could favor heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, scientific simulation, or server-style multitasking. The triple-channel LPDDR5X memory with 228.6 GB/s bandwidth could benefit memory-bound applications like large dataset processing or in-memory analytics. The larger L2 and L3 caches could reduce latency for repetitive access patterns.

The Ryzen 5 40's 4-core, 8-thread design with a 15-watt TDP positions it for efficiency-focused mobile tasks. Its 2.80 GHz base clock and 4.30 GHz boost clock are moderate, and its dual-channel 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for typical productivity workloads. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics provide basic display output without requiring a discrete GPU.

For users who need confirmed performance data, the Ryzen 5 40 is the only option with recorded results. For users who prioritize core count, cache size, memory bandwidth, and the latest process node, the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 offers those specifications on paper, but without benchmark validation, its actual performance remains unverified. The database shows zero wins for either chip in head-to-head comparisons, which means no measured advantage exists for either part at this time.