Intel Core 7 250H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison

Intel Core 7 250H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100

The Intel Core 7 250H and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 represent two distinct approaches to mobile computing. The Intel part is a high-performance x86 processor with a long list of recorded benchmark results, while the Qualcomm part is a newer ARM-based design with a different feature set but no recorded performance scores in the database. The data shows that the Intel Core 7 250H has a substantial body of measured performance, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has an empty benchmark profile and sits at the 50th percentile by default. This makes any direct comparison of compute speed one-sided, but the architectural and specification differences are clear enough to draw conclusions about their intended roles.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 250H is the only one of the two with measurable performance data, so any user looking for verified compute results must choose it. Its average benchmark score of 35728 places it among capable mobile processors, and its percentile rank of 85 means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no rivals listed, meaning there is no data to confirm its actual speed. The Intel chip is also the only one with a launch MSRP, listed at $502, while the Qualcomm part has no such figure.

For users who prioritize raw multi-threaded performance, the Intel Core 7 250H is the clear pick based on its Cinebench results. For users who prioritize power efficiency and a modern fabrication process, the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has the advantage on paper, with a 3 nm node from TSMC compared to Intel's 10 nm process. However, the lack of any benchmark data for the Qualcomm part means its real-world performance is entirely unverified in the database. The Intel part is also the safer choice for software compatibility, as it uses a conventional x86 architecture, while the Snapdragon part uses an ARM-based design that may require different software support.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 250H wins in every category where actual measurements exist. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, which is more than the Snapdragon's 12 cores and 12 threads. This gives it a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. Its recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16561 and single-core score of 1931 provide concrete evidence of its capability. The PassMark suite shows strong results across the board, including 99100 in integer math, 65094 in floating point math, and 27030 in multithreaded performance.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 wins on paper in power efficiency and process technology. Its 3 nm process node from TSMC is significantly more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically indicates lower power consumption and better thermal behavior. It also has a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz compared to the Intel's 2.50 GHz, although the Intel part has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz while the Qualcomm part has no listed boost clock. The Snapdragon part also has a higher PCIe lane count with 12 lanes compared to the Intel's 8 lanes, both using Gen 5. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s is a notable specification, though the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H, and is part of the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The chip has 14 cores and 20 threads, which indicates a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The socket is Intel BGA 1744, and it was released on December 17, 2024.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses the Glymur codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 220 mm². It has 12 cores and 12 threads, meaning no hyper-threading or equivalent. The cache layout is different: 288 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L2, with no L3 cache listed. It supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s. The integrated graphics are Adreno X2-85. The socket is Qualcomm BGA 2343, and the release date is listed as April 5, 2026, which is later than the Intel part. The manufacturer is listed as "Unknown" in the database, which is unusual, but the foundry is confirmed as TSMC.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the base clock of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no listed boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 7 250H uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. The Intel Core 7 250H has 17 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 supports LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 250H has no memory bandwidth figure listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark results in the database for these two processors. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the win counts for both are 0. This means no side-by-side test data exists to compare their performance in identical workloads. The Intel Core 7 250H, however, has a full set of standalone benchmarks that can be examined on their own merits.

The Intel Core 7 250H delivers strong Cinebench results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3147 in multi-core and 298 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9697 in multi-core and 1368 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16561 in multi-core and 1931 in single-core. These numbers show a consistent pattern of high multi-threaded throughput, which is expected from a 14-core, 20-thread design.

The PassMark suite for the Intel part shows additional strengths. It scores 303269 in data compression, 18206 in data encryption, 17318 in extended instructions, 106 in find prime numbers, 65094 in floating point math, 99100 in integer math, 27030 in multithreaded performance, 1824 in physics, 34136 in random string sorting, and 4148 in single-threaded performance. The integer math score of 99100 is particularly strong, indicating good general-purpose compute capability. The physics score of 1824 is lower relative to other scores, which may suggest a specific workload characteristic. The find prime numbers score of 106 is notably low, though this test often stresses a specific part of the pipeline.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 7 250H provide context for its average score of 35728. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average score of 35719, a difference of 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H has an average score of 35670, which is 0.2 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has an average score of 35802, which is 0.2 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has an average score of 35909, which is 0.5 percent ahead. This places the Intel Core 7 250H in a tightly packed group where the top performers are within half a percent of each other. The data shows that the Intel part is competitive with these established desktop and mobile processors, despite being a mobile chip.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no such context. With no benchmarks and no rivals, the database cannot confirm its performance level. Its percentile of 50 is the default value for an unmeasured part, not a reflection of actual capability. The only objective data for the Snapdragon part comes from its specifications, such as the 4.00 GHz base clock, the 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, and the 3 nm process node. These specs suggest a design focused on efficiency and bandwidth, but without test results, any performance claim remains speculative.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Intel base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz; the Qualcomm base clock is 4.00 GHz with no boost clock listed. The Intel TDP is 45 watts, while the Qualcomm TDP is not listed. The Intel socket is Intel BGA 1744, compared to Qualcomm BGA 2343 for the Snapdragon.

The architecture differs completely. Intel uses Raptor Lake with a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. Qualcomm uses the Glymur codename with a 3 nm process at TSMC, and a die size of 220 mm². The cache structures are different: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Qualcomm has 288 KB L1 per core and 16 MB shared L2, with no L3 listed. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X. The Intel memory bus is dual-channel with no bandwidth figure, while the Qualcomm memory bus is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s.

PCIe configurations differ as well. Intel uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while Qualcomm uses Gen 5 with 12 lanes. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 EU on the Intel side, compared to Adreno X2-85 on the Qualcomm side. The release dates differ, with Intel launching on December 17, 2024, and Qualcomm launching on April 5, 2026. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $502, while the Qualcomm part has no launch MSRP listed. The Intel part number is SRQ6UQ5MK, while the Qualcomm part number is X2E78100. The Intel part is manufactured by Intel, and the Qualcomm part has its manufacturer listed as "Unknown" in the database, though the foundry is TSMC. Both parts are marked as Active production status, both are mobile segments, and neither has an unlocked multiplier or ECC memory support.