Intel Core 7 160HL vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Intel Core 7 160HL and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are two distinct processor designs targeting different market segments. The data shows a clear split between a desktop-oriented Raptor Lake part and a mobile Panther Lake chip. The Core Ultra 5 336H is the only one with recorded benchmark scores, making direct numerical comparison impossible. The verdict must rely on architectural differences and the available performance data for the Core Ultra 5.

The Verdict

The database contains benchmark scores for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H but none for the Intel Core 7 160HL. Therefore, any selection between the two must be based on the recorded data for the Core Ultra 5 and the known architectural positioning of both parts. The Core Ultra 5 336H sits at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34485. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which scores 34554, a delta of -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i5-13450HX, scoring 34333, a delta of 0.4 percent. This indicates the Core Ultra 5 336H performs nearly identically to these established mobile and desktop processors.

For users who require a mobile platform, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the only viable option, as the Core 7 160HL is a desktop part. The Core 7 160HL, with its higher boost clock and larger shared cache, may offer advantages in single-threaded workloads, but no data confirms this. The Core Ultra 5 336H, with its 3 nm process node and 16 cores, presents a more modern foundation. The data suggests that for any workload where the Core Ultra 5 336H has been measured, it delivers performance comparable to high-end processors from the previous generation, such as the Core i7-13700HX. Without benchmark data for the Core 7 160HL, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the only chip with a verifiable performance profile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in architecture, process technology, and platform. The Intel Core 7 160HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process node. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 desktop platform.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3, using the Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, suggesting a design without hyper-threading. The L1 cache is larger at 192 KB per core, and L2 is 2.5 MB per core, but the shared L3 cache is smaller at 18 MB. This chip uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, marking it as a mobile part. The process node difference, 10 nm versus 3 nm, is significant, indicating a major generational leap in manufacturing efficiency for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Memory support also differs. The Core 7 160HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The PCIe capabilities differ as well: the Core 7 160HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 336H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes. The integrated graphics are also different, with the Core 7 160HL using Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, and the Core Ultra 5 336H using Intel Xe3 Graphics. Both processors have a production status of Active, but the Core 7 160HL was released in April 2024, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has a release date in January 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides head-to-head benchmark results only for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. The Core 7 160HL has no benchmark entries, so a direct comparison of scores is impossible. The recorded data for the Core Ultra 5 336H shows strong performance across various Cinebench and Passmark tests.

In Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991 in multicore and 3387 in singlecore. For context, its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX, has an average score of 34554, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Core Ultra 5 336H's average of 34485. The Core Ultra 5 336H also edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which scores 34260, a delta of 0.7 percent. In Passmark tests, the Core Ultra 5 336H scores 28545 in multithread and 4013 in single-thread. It achieves 62070 in integer math and 82415 in floating-point math. Data compression scores 280340, and encryption scores 21291.

The Core 7 160HL, with no benchmarks, cannot be directly compared. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 336H delivers scores that place it slightly below the Core i7-13700HX but above the Core i5-13450HX and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. The wins recorded in the head-to-head section show zero wins for both items, as no direct comparative tests exist.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 160HL has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H have more cores than the Intel Core 7 160HL?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores, while the Core 7 160HL has 14 cores. However, the Core 7 160HL has 20 threads versus 16 threads for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 160HL is built on a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses a 3 nm process node.

Q: Which processor supports LPDDR5X memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 7 160HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare to the Intel Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485, which is 0.2 percent lower than the Core i7-13700HX's score of 34554.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core 7 160HL has a TDP of 45, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has recorded wins in all benchmark categories due to the absence of data for the Core 7 160HL. Its performance profile shows strengths in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23991. The Passmark multithread score of 28545 and integer math score of 62070 indicate solid compute performance. The single-thread score of 4013 in Passmark and 3387 in Cinebench R23 shows competitive single-core capability.

The Intel Core 7 160HL, without benchmarks, cannot be assigned wins. Its architectural features suggest potential advantages in certain areas. The larger 24 MB shared L3 cache may benefit workloads with high data reuse. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz could provide an edge in lightly threaded tasks. The support for DDR4 memory may offer more flexibility in system builds. These remain speculative without recorded data.

The data indicates the Core Ultra 5 336H is a capable mobile processor, positioned near the top of its class. The Core 7 160HL is a desktop chip with a different feature set, but its performance is unverified in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The core count differs, with the Core 7 160HL having 14 cores and the Core Ultra 5 336H having 16 cores. Thread counts also differ, 20 for the Core 7 160HL and 16 for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The base clock for the Core 7 160HL is 2.50 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for the Core 7 160HL and 4.60 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 336H. TDP values are 45 for the Core 7 160HL and 25 for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

The socket types are different: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 7 160HL and Intel BGA 2540 for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The architecture is Raptor Lake for the Core 7 160HL and Panther Lake for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Process nodes are 10 nm and 3 nm, respectively. Cache sizes vary, with L1 at 80 KB per core for the Core 7 160HL and 192 KB per core for the Core Ultra 5 336H. L2 is 2 MB per core versus 2.5 MB per core. L3 is 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared.

Memory support differs: DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core 7 160HL, DDR5 and LPDDR5X for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The memory bus is dual-channel for both. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while the Core 7 160HL has no such value. PCIe lanes are Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core 7 160HL and Gen 5 with 12 lanes for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for the Core 7 160HL and Intel Xe3 Graphics for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The market segment is Desktop for the Core 7 160HL and Mobile for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Release dates are April 2024 for the Core 7 160HL and January 2026 for the Core Ultra 5 336H.