Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head test results between the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores at all, with an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs. The Core Ultra 5 336H, in contrast, has a complete benchmark profile with an average score of 34485 and a percentile rank of 84.

The Core Ultra 5 336H delivers substantial multi-threaded performance in Cinebench tests. It scores 2418 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 10076 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 23991 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Single-core results follow a similar pattern: 341 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1422 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 3387 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores place the chip in the upper tier of the database, within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which posts an average score of 34554. The Core Ultra 5 336H also sits ahead of the Intel Core i5-13450HX by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 by 0.8%.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 5 336H show consistent strength across workloads. Integer math reaches 62070, floating point math reaches 82415, and extended instructions score 24542. The chip processes data compression at 280340 and data encryption at 21291. Random string sorting completes at 34402, while the prime number search scores 299. The multithread score is 28545, and the single-thread score is 4013. Physics testing yields 2682.

Because the Core 5 223PQE lacks recorded benchmarks, no comparison of wins or losses between the two parts can be made from the database. The data confirms that the Core Ultra 5 336H is fully characterized, while the Core 5 223PQE is not yet represented in benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core 5 223PQE?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has an average benchmark score of 0, and it has no entries in the benchmark results list. Its percentile rank among all CPUs is 50.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34485 points. It trails the Intel Core i7-13700HX by 0.2%, and it leads the Intel Core i5-13450HX by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 by 0.8%.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 3387 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1422 in Cinebench R20 single-core, 341 in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 4013 in PassMark single-thread testing.

Q: What is the multi-thread performance of the Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 10076 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, 2418 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, and 28545 in PassMark multithread testing.

Q: Does the Core 5 223PQE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the Core 5 223PQE, so no performance scores are available for that processor.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and target different market segments. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node and manufactured by Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake codename with the Panther Lake-H architecture and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 generation. It is built on a 3 nm process node, also by Intel.

Core organization differs sharply. The Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 5 336H therefore doubles the physical core count but does not double the thread count, which indicates a hybrid core arrangement without hyper-threading across all cores. The Core 5 223PQE uses 16 threads on 8 cores, implying simultaneous multithreading on all cores.

Cache hierarchies follow different designs. The Core 5 223PQE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H has larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations, while the Core 5 223PQE has a larger shared L3 pool.

Memory support differs as well. The Core 5 223PQE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 336H offers higher peak bandwidth and adds LPDDR5X support, while the Core 5 223PQE retains DDR4 compatibility.

ECC memory is present on the Core 5 223PQE but absent on the Core Ultra 5 336H. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core 5 223PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 336H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 5 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel Xe3 Graphics.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 5 223PQE runs at higher frequencies in both states.

Thermal design power differs by a wide margin. The Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 watts. The Core 5 223PQE draws five times the thermal envelope of the mobile chip.

Sockets are not interchangeable. The Core 5 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel BGA 2540. The former is a desktop socket, the latter is a mobile BGA package.

Core and thread counts differ as detailed above: 8 cores and 16 threads versus 16 cores and 16 threads. The L3 cache also differs: 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared. L1 and L2 per-core capacities differ: 80 KB versus 192 KB for L1, and 2 MB versus 2.5 MB for L2.

Memory bandwidth differs: 89.6 GB/s versus 115.2 GB/s. ECC support is present on the Core 5 223PQE and absent on the Core Ultra 5 336H. PCIe lane count differs: 16 lanes versus 12 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 770 versus Intel Xe3 Graphics.

The Core 5 223PQE has a launch MSRP of $319. The Core Ultra 5 336H has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both processors have locked multipliers and active production status. The Core 5 223PQE was released later, with a release date in March 2026, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has a release date in January 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 336H wins in every recorded benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with benchmark data. Its 16-core configuration, higher memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and 3 nm process node position it as the stronger performer in the database. The chip ranks at the 84th percentile among all CPUs and holds its own against the Intel Core i7-13700HX, the Intel Core i5-13450HX, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.

The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded wins because it has no recorded scores. Its specifications, however, indicate a different role. The 125 watt TDP, 5.50 GHz boost clock, 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, and ECC capability describe a desktop processor designed for sustained multi-core workloads in a stationary platform. The Socket 1700 form factor and UHD Graphics 770 further confirm a desktop orientation.

The data supports a clear split. The Core Ultra 5 336H belongs in mobile systems where its 25 watt TDP and LPDDR5X support matter, and its benchmark results show it can handle demanding multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Core 5 223PQE belongs in desktop systems where its higher clocks, larger L3 cache, ECC memory, and expanded PCIe lane count are relevant, but its actual performance cannot be verified from the database.

The Verdict

The benchmark data offers only one fully measured processor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H delivers a complete performance profile with an average score of 34485, an 84th percentile ranking, and competitive positioning against the Intel Core i7-13700HX, Intel Core i5-13450HX, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. Its 16 cores, 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 3 nm fabrication make it the stronger choice for users who need measurable performance from a mobile platform.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE cannot be evaluated through benchmark results because no scores exist in the database. Its specifications describe a desktop processor with a 125 watt TDP, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 24 MB of L3 cache, ECC memory support, and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Users who require those specific desktop features would consider it on specification alone, but the database provides no evidence of its performance relative to the Core Ultra 5 336H or any other processor.

The selection between the two parts depends on platform and data availability. For mobile use with verified performance, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the only choice with recorded benchmark evidence. For desktop use with ECC memory and high-frequency operation, the Core 5 223PQE offers the relevant specifications, but its performance remains unmeasured in the database.