Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PQE and Intel Core i5-14450HX are two Intel processors separated by platform intent, one a desktop chip built for a fixed socket, the other a mobile part designed for high-performance laptops. The database holds complete benchmark results for the i5-14450HX, while the 223PQE has no recorded scores, so the quantitative analysis must rely on the available measurements for the mobile part and the architectural data for both. The i5-14450HX occupies the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32040, placing it in a competitive tier against other recent Intel and older high-end parts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only one of the two with benchmark records, and its data shows a clear strength profile across multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20108 multi-core and 2838 single-core, figures that place it firmly in the upper tier of mobile processors. The PassMark suite reinforces this: it reaches 23680 in multithread, 3643 in single thread, 78330 in integer math, and 58037 in floating point math. These results indicate a processor that handles both heavily parallel rendering tasks and everyday responsiveness without a dramatic drop-off.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark entries in the database, so its wins cannot be measured directly. What the data does show is a desktop part with a 125 W TDP, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications suggest the 223PQE is designed to sustain high clock speeds under continuous load, which typically favors the desktop form factor where cooling is less constrained. The i5-14450HX, by contrast, carries a 55 W TDP and a 4.80 GHz boost clock, characteristics that point to power-limited operation in a mobile chassis. The recorded data cannot confirm a win for the 223PQE, but the platform differences imply it would hold an advantage in sustained all-core workloads if the mobile part were thermally constrained.

For single-threaded tasks, the i5-14450HX delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2838 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3643. These are strong numbers for a mobile chip. The 223PQE’s higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to 4.80 GHz suggests it could outperform in lightly threaded applications, but without recorded benchmarks, that remains a specification-based inference rather than a measured result.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a manufacturing node, both built on Intel’s 10 nm process, and both use the same per-core cache configuration: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core. The differences begin with core counts. The 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads. That arrangement means the mobile chip offers two additional physical cores but the same thread count, suggesting a hybrid core layout or a configuration where some cores lack hyper-threading.

The L3 cache differs as well. The 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3, while the i5-14450HX has 20 MB. Despite having fewer cores, the desktop part carries more shared cache, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set. The process node is identical at 10 nm, and both parts are produced by Intel, so architectural efficiency differences come down to core design and cache hierarchy rather than fabrication.

The sockets separate them completely. The 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform, while the i5-14450HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a soldered mobile package. The 223PQE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed as part of the Core 5 generation, while the i5-14450HX is a Raptor Lake-HX refresh part from the Core 14th Gen series. The mobile chip has a die size of 257 mm², a figure not recorded for the desktop part. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory. The 223PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14450HX has no bandwidth figure in the database.

Integrated graphics differ: the 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14450HX uses UHD Graphics 710. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The 223PQE has a locked multiplier, while the i5-14450HX has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking on the mobile part if the platform permits it. The desktop part has a launch MSRP of $319, while the mobile part has no recorded launch price.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the two processors. All quantitative analysis must therefore come from the i5-14450HX’s standalone results. In Cinebench R15, the i5-14450HX scores 2026 multi-core and 285 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8445 multi-core and 1191 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results, 20108 multi-core and 2838 single-core, show a scaling pattern where multi-core scores increase substantially with each newer version of the test, while single-core scores also rise but at a slower relative rate.

PassMark results for the i5-14450HX cover a broad set of workloads. Data compression reaches 278538, a very high figure that indicates strong performance in archiving and storage-related tasks. Data encryption scores 15574, and extended instructions (SIMD) reach 17207. Prime number finding scores 98, a low figure typical of this benchmark’s scaling. Floating point math hits 58037, integer math reaches 78330, and random string sorting scores 29565. Physics simulation scores 1475.

The nearest rivals in the database for the i5-14450HX provide context for its average score of 32040. The Intel Core i7-13705H scores 32076, a delta of -0.1 percent. The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a delta of -0.3 percent. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a delta of -0.6 percent. These deltas show that the i5-14450HX is effectively tied with these four processors, sitting within 0.6 percent of each one’s average score. It is neither clearly ahead nor behind any of them in aggregate performance.

For the 223PQE, there are no scores to compare. Its percentile rank is 50, which places it at the median of all CPUs in the database, but that percentile is based on no recorded average score. The i5-14450HX sits at the 82nd percentile, a substantial gap that reflects its measured performance across the full benchmark suite.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both have the same thread count, but the mobile part offers two additional physical cores.

Q: What is the highest boost clock between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The desktop part’s boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher.

Q: How does the i5-14450HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14450HX has an average benchmark score of 32040. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32076 (-0.1 percent), Intel Core i5-14400 at 32115 (-0.2 percent), Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121 (-0.3 percent), and Intel Core i9-11900 at 32226 (-0.6 percent). All four are within 0.6 percent of its score.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i5-14450HX support ECC memory. They also both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The desktop part has 4 MB more L3 despite having fewer cores.

Q: What are the socket types for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile soldered package.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PQE | Intel Core i5-14450HX |

|----------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Die size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $319 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part number | SA4QC | SRMXK |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 82 |

| Avg benchmark score | 0 | 32040 |

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only one of the two with recorded performance data, and that data is strong. Its 82nd percentile rank, average score of 32040, and Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 20108 place it among capable mobile processors. The nearest rival scores, all within 0.6 percent, confirm that it trades blows with the Intel Core i7-13705H, Intel Core i5-14400, Intel Core i7-12800H, and Intel Core i9-11900. For a laptop part, that level of aggregate performance is notable.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE cannot be evaluated on measured performance because the database contains no benchmarks for it. Its specifications tell a different story: a 125 W desktop part with 8 cores, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache. It targets the desktop segment with a fixed socket, a locked multiplier, and a launch MSRP of $319. The higher TDP and boost clock suggest it is built for sustained performance in a desktop chassis, while the i5-14450HX operates within a 55 W envelope.

Who should pick which depends entirely on what the data supports. The i5-14450HX is the choice for anyone needing a mobile processor with verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as evidenced by its benchmark scores and close competition with several established Intel parts. The 223PQE is the choice for a desktop build where the higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, and higher memory bandwidth figure are the relevant specifications, but no measured performance confirms its standing. The data records one processor with proven results and one with only architectural promise.