Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 7 160HL Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core 7 160HL are both desktop processors built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet they target different segments of the market. The Core 5 213PTE is a Bartlett Lake part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 160HL is a Raptor Lake-PS part with 14 cores and 20 threads. Both share the same 45 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, but their architectures, integrated graphics, memory bandwidth, and PCIe configurations differ significantly. The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, so the analysis relies on their individual recorded measurements and architectural specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not include any head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 213PTE versus the Intel Core 7 160HL. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and there are no recorded wins for either processor in a direct comparison. This absence of data means that any performance differentiation must be inferred from the individual benchmark scores of the Core 5 213PTE and the architectural characteristics of the Core 7 160HL.

The Core 5 213PTE has a substantial set of recorded benchmark results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2192 in multicore and 309 in singlecore. Cinebench R20 results show 9135 in multicore and 1289 in singlecore. Cinebench R23 yields 21751 in multicore and 3070 in singlecore. PassMark tests include data compression at 261083, data encryption at 14413, extended instructions at 16146, find prime numbers at 157, floating point math at 71722, integer math at 93109, multithread at 25590, physics at 2199, random string sorting at 30106, and single thread at 3718. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 213PTE is 32924, and it sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs.

The Core 7 160HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile is 50. This means the database provides no direct performance measurements for this processor, making a numeric comparison impossible. The Core 5 213PTE, by contrast, is fully characterized across multiple rendering and compute workloads.

Given the lack of direct comparisons, the data shows that the Core 5 213PTE is a measured performer with verified scores, while the Core 7 160HL remains unmeasured in this database. The nearest rivals to the Core 5 213PTE offer context for its standing. The Intel Core i7-12700 has an average score of 32942, which is 0.1% higher than the Core 5 213PTE. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G also scores 33089, 0.5% higher. These deltas show that the Core 5 213PTE is effectively within a narrow band of these rivals, trailing the two AMD desktop parts by half a percent and the Intel i7-12700 by a tenth of a percent, while edging out the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by three tenths of a percent.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 160HL uses Raptor Lake-PS. Both are built on a 10 nm process node and fabricated by Intel. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Core 7 160HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. This core count difference is the most prominent architectural divergence, with the Core 7 160HL offering 6 more cores and 4 more threads.

Cache configurations are identical in structure. Both processors feature 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core cache sizes mean the Core 7 160HL has more total L2 cache due to its higher core count, but the database does not specify total L2 capacity. The L3 cache is the same 24 MB shared across all cores for both.

Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5, and both use a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 5 213PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 160HL has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support differs: the Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 160HL does not.

PCIe configurations diverge. The Core 5 213PTE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 160HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This means the Core 5 213PTE provides a newer PCIe generation and double the lane count, which can affect bandwidth for expansion cards and NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 160HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The database does not provide benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so the performance gap cannot be quantified, but the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU typically represents a higher-tier integrated solution compared to UHD Graphics 730.

The Core 5 213PTE has a release date of March 8, 2026, while the Core 7 160HL was released on April 7, 2024. The Core 5 213PTE has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Core 7 160HL has no recorded launch MSRP. Both are active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split between the two processors. The Core 5 213PTE is a fully benchmarked processor with scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests. Its average benchmark score of 32924 places it in the 83rd percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score. The Core 7 160HL has no benchmark data, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of 0. This means the database cannot confirm any performance level for the Core 7 160HL.

From a specification standpoint, the Core 7 160HL offers more cores and threads, which suggests potential for higher multi-threaded throughput, but no recorded measurements support this. The Core 5 213PTE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ECC memory support, and a higher memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s. The Core 7 160HL counters with a newer integrated GPU tier (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU versus UHD Graphics 730) and an earlier release date.

For a user relying strictly on the database, the Core 5 213PTE is the only processor with verified performance data. Its benchmark scores indicate strong single-thread and multi-thread capability, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 and a singlecore score of 3070. The Core 7 160HL remains an unmeasured entity, so any performance claim about it cannot be substantiated from this database.

The choice between them depends on whether raw core count or verified performance and platform features matter more. The Core 7 160HL has 14 cores and 20 threads versus 8 cores and 16 threads, but without benchmark results, the practical benefit is unknown. The Core 5 213PTE has a measured average score that rivals established CPUs like the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, both of which are within a half percent of its score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 160HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, while the Intel Core 7 160HL has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, but the Intel Core 7 160HL does not.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does each processor provide?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 7 160HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Intel Core 7 160HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Q: What is the recorded memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Core 7 160HL has no recorded memory bandwidth in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every category where the database provides measurable data. It has a recorded boost clock of 5.20 GHz, matching the Core 7 160HL, but its base clock is 2.10 GHz versus 2.50 GHz for the Core 7 160HL. Despite the lower base clock, the Core 5 213PTE delivers verified benchmark results across all tested workloads, including Cinebench R15 multicore at 2192, Cinebench R20 multicore at 9135, and Cinebench R23 multicore at 21751. Its PassMark multithread score of 25590 and single thread score of 3718 provide concrete performance figures.

The Core 5 213PTE also wins on platform features. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a newer and wider interface compared to the Core 7 160HL's PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. It has ECC memory support, which the Core 7 160HL lacks. Its memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is recorded, while the Core 7 160HL has none listed. The Core 5 213PTE also has a launch MSRP of $221, which can be stated as a reference point.

The Intel Core 7 160HL wins on core and thread count. With 14 cores and 20 threads, it offers substantially more parallelism than the Core 5 213PTE's 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 2.10 GHz, which could benefit lightly threaded workloads if the architecture scales accordingly. The Core 7 160HL features Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, a more advanced integrated graphics unit compared to UHD Graphics 730, which may deliver better display and media capabilities, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Core 7 160HL also has an earlier release date of April 2024, while the Core 5 213PTE was released in March 2026.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. Core count: the Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores, while the Core 7 160HL has 14 cores. Threads: 16 versus 20. Base clock: 2.10 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE, 2.50 GHz for the Core 7 160HL. Boost clock is identical at 5.20 GHz for both.

Codename: Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 213PTE, Raptor Lake-PS for the Core 7 160HL. Generation: Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS). Architecture: the Core 7 160HL is listed as Raptor Lake, while the Core 5 213PTE has no architecture field. Process node is the same: 10 nm for both.

Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 213PTE, none recorded for the Core 7 160HL. ECC memory: true for the Core 5 213PTE, false for the Core 7 160HL. PCIe: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 5 213PTE, Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core 7 160HL.

Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 5 213PTE, Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for the Core 7 160HL. Release date: March 8, 2026 for the Core 5 213PTE, April 7, 2024 for the Core 7 160HL. Launch MSRP: $221 for the Core 5 213PTE, none recorded for the Core 7 160HL.

Cache sizes are identical in per-core structure: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 for both. Memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) and memory bus (dual-channel) are also the same. Both use Intel Socket 1700, have a 45 W TDP, are desktop parts, are active in production, and have locked multipliers. The part number for the Core 5 213PTE is SA4QM, while the Core 7 160HL has an unknown part number.