Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 5 213PTE includes a full set of benchmark results, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE currently has no benchmark entries in the database. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. However, the available metrics for the 213PTE can be examined against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline, and the architectural differences between the two processors can be analyzed to project likely behavior.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE achieves an average benchmark score of 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700, scores 32942, a difference of only 0.1 percent in favor of the rival. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H trails by 0.3 percent, scoring 32812. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G both sit ahead by 0.5 percent, with scores of 33079 and 33089 respectively. These margins are within a narrow band, indicating the 213PTE performs competitively with established mid-range and upper-mid-range parts.

Looking at specific workload results, the 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and a single-core score of 3070. In R20, the multi-core result is 9135, with a single-core score of 1289. The R15 run shows 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. These numbers suggest a processor that scales well across threaded and lightly threaded tasks alike.

PassMark results for the 213PTE show a multi-thread score of 25590 and a single-thread score of 3718. Integer math reaches 93109, while floating point math hits 71722. Data compression scores 261083, and data encryption reaches 14413. Extended instruction performance is 16146, and random string sorting completes at 30106. Prime number finding scores 157, and physics simulation scores 2199. The single-thread metric of 3718 appears twice in the database, once under the label "passmark_single_thread" and once under "passmark_singlethread", confirming consistency in the recorded result.

Because the 223PQE has no benchmark scores, the head-to-head section must rely on the specifications that differentiate the two. The 223PQE operates at a 4.00 GHz base clock and a 5.50 GHz boost clock, compared to the 213PTE's 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost. The higher base clock of the 223PQE suggests a substantial advantage in sustained all-core workloads, while the boost clock advantage of 0.30 GHz gives it an edge in single-threaded and lightly threaded scenarios. The 213PTE's lower base clock may indicate a power-optimized design, but the 223PQE's 125 W TDP versus the 213PTE's 45 W TDP points to a much higher thermal envelope for the former, which likely enables those higher clocks.

Memory bandwidth also differs: the 223PQE supports 89.6 GB/s, while the 213PTE supports 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory and support DDR4 and DDR5, but the higher bandwidth figure for the 223PQE should translate to better performance in memory-sensitive workloads such as data compression and encryption, assuming the rest of the memory subsystem behaves equivalently.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same foundational architecture. Each is built on Intel's 10 nm process node and uses the Bartlett Lake codename, with the generation listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). Both have 8 cores and 16 threads, and both use the Intel Socket 1700. The cache hierarchy is identical on paper: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and both support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ. The 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770. This indicates a higher-tier iGPU on the 223PQE, which could matter for systems running without a discrete graphics card. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, so expansion capability is the same.

The production status for both is Active, and both have the same release date of 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z. The part numbers differ: SA4QM for the 213PTE and SA4QC for the 223PQE. The market segment for both is Desktop.

The most significant architectural differences are the clock speeds, TDP, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics tier. The 223PQE is configured for higher performance at the cost of substantially more power. The 213PTE appears designed for efficiency, given its 45 W TDP and lower base clock. Both share the same core count, thread count, and cache layout, so the performance gap between them should stem primarily from clock speed and power delivery rather than from any difference in core design or cache capacity.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Core 5 223PQE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 W, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: Are the cache sizes the same?

A: Yes, both have 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Intel Core 5 213PTE.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. The base clock is 2.10 GHz for the 213PTE and 4.00 GHz for the 223PQE. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for the 213PTE and 5.50 GHz for the 223PQE. The TDP is 45 W for the 213PTE and 125 W for the 223PQE.

Memory bandwidth differs: 76.8 GB/s for the 213PTE versus 89.6 GB/s for the 223PQE. The integrated graphics differ as well, with UHD Graphics 730 on the 213PTE and UHD Graphics 770 on the 223PQE.

The launch MSRP differs. The 213PTE has a launch MSRP of $221. The 223PQE has a launch MSRP of $319.

The part numbers are different: SA4QM for the 213PTE and SA4QC for the 223PQE.

Identical specifications include cores (8), threads (16), socket (Intel Socket 1700), codename (Bartlett Lake), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (2 MB per core), L3 cache (24 MB shared), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (true), PCIe (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), release date (2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z), and multiplier unlock status (false).

The Verdict

The data shows two processors from the same Bartlett Lake family that share a core configuration but diverge sharply in power and clock strategy. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924 and sits in the 83rd percentile, with performance nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-12700, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. The 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be verified from the database at this time.

Based on specifications alone, the 223PQE should deliver higher sustained throughput due to its 4.00 GHz base clock, 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 125 W TDP. The 213PTE, with a 45 W TDP and a 2.10 GHz base clock, appears oriented toward power-constrained environments, though its 5.20 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded peaks high. The 223PQE also offers higher memory bandwidth and a better integrated GPU, which could make it the stronger choice for systems relying on the iGPU or memory-heavy applications.

The 213PTE is the only one of the two with benchmark data, and its results place it in strong company. Its average score is within 0.5 percent of four well-known rivals, making it a balanced performer in its current database standing. The 223PQE has no such data, so any claim about its real-world performance cannot be substantiated from the recorded measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in efficiency-oriented deployments. Its 45 W TDP is drastically lower than the 223PQE's 125 W TDP, making it better suited for systems where thermal output and power draw are primary constraints. Its benchmark results confirm it can still compete with established CPUs: the 213PTE sits within 0.5 percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and 8700G, and within 0.1 percent of the Intel Core i7-12700. For workloads that match its recorded strengths, such as integer math (93109), floating point math (71722), and data compression (261083), the 213PTE shows it can handle demanding compute tasks despite its modest power envelope.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins in raw performance scenarios, based on its specification sheet. The 4.00 GHz base clock is nearly double that of the 213PTE, which should translate to faster sustained multi-core execution in workloads that run at base clock for extended periods. The 5.50 GHz boost clock provides a 0.30 GHz advantage in single-threaded bursts. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is 12.8 GB/s higher than the 213PTE, which should benefit memory-bound operations. The UHD Graphics 770 is a higher tier than the UHD Graphics 730, giving the 223PQE an advantage in integrated graphics performance. The 125 W TDP indicates the 223PQE is designed to sustain high clocks under load, which should make it the stronger option for uncompromised desktop workloads where power consumption is not a limiting factor.

The two processors do not overlap in their apparent design goals. The 213PTE offers proven competitive performance at low power, while the 223PQE offers higher clocks, more bandwidth, and a better iGPU at a much higher power cost. Buyers seeking a low-power desktop part with verified benchmark results have data supporting the 213PTE. Buyers seeking maximum performance from the Bartlett Lake Core 5 lineup have a specification-based case for the 223PQE, though its lack of recorded benchmarks means its actual performance remains unmeasured in this database.