Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PE compare to the Intel Processor N250 in core and thread counts?

A: The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. This means the Core 5 213PE offers double the physical cores and quadruple the thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between these two processors?

A: The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The N250 has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The Core 5 213PE boosts nearly 1.4 GHz higher.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Core 5 213PE has a TDP of 65 watts, whereas the N250 has a TDP of 6 watts. The N250 consumes a fraction of the power, making it far more efficient for low-power applications.

Q: What memory configurations do each support?

A: The Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The N250 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 in a single-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Core 5 213PE offers exactly double the memory bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both feature UHD Graphics 730 as their integrated GPU. Despite the large performance gap in CPU benchmarks, the graphics solution is identical.

Q: What are the market segments and sockets for each?

A: The Core 5 213PE is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700, while the N250 is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1264. The Core 5 213PE also supports ECC memory, which the N250 does not.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different Intel design families. The Core 5 213PE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the N250 uses the Twin Lake architecture and is classified under the Intel Processor generation, derived from Alder Lake-N. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry.

Cache organization differs significantly. The Core 5 213PE allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The N250 uses 96 KB of L1 cache per core but shares 2 MB of L2 across all cores, with only 6 MB of shared L3. That is a fourfold difference in L3 capacity.

PCIe support also separates the two. The Core 5 213PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the N250 offers Gen 3 with 9 lanes. This gives the desktop part both a newer PCIe generation and more lanes for expansion.

Memory architecture is another major split. The Core 5 213PE runs dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the N250 runs single-channel with 38.4 GB/s. The desktop chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, and the mobile chip adds LPDDR5 support. ECC memory is available only on the Core 5 213PE.

The release timeline and market positioning also differ. The N250 launched in January 2025 as a mobile part, while the Core 5 213PE arrived in March 2026 as a desktop processor. Both are currently listed as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data points to two entirely different use cases. The Core 5 213PE is a high-performance desktop processor. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache place it in the top 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 35,428 places it right alongside processors like the Core i7-13700T, Core i7-12700KF, Core i5-13600T, and Core i7-12700K, all within 0.4 percent of its score. This is a chip designed for sustained throughput.

The N250 is a low-power mobile processor. Its 4 cores, 4 threads, 6 watt TDP, and 6 MB of L3 cache target efficiency rather than performance. It sits in the 50th percentile of all CPUs, and it has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The single-channel memory and Gen 3 PCIe further confirm its role as a lightweight, power-conscious part.

Users who need multi-threaded compute, fast memory bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 5 expansion should choose the Core 5 213PE. Users who prioritize minimal power draw, mobile form factors, and basic computing tasks should choose the N250. The N250 cannot compete on raw performance, but it does not need to, its design goals are entirely different.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PE | Intel Processor N250 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 6 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Twin Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | None |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 5 213PE has a full suite of benchmark results, while the N250 has no recorded scores in the database. This means all direct comparisons rely on the Core 5 213PE's absolute numbers, which in turn can be contextualized against its nearest rivals.

In Cinebench R23, the Core 5 213PE scores 22,468 in multi-core and 3,172 in single-core. The multi-core figure is roughly seven times the single-core score, which reflects strong scaling across its 16 threads. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9,436 multi-core and 1,332 single-core. The R15 run shows 2,264 multi-core and 319 single-core.

PassMark results show a similar pattern. The multi-thread score is 26,434, while single-thread is 4,060. Integer math reaches 92,089, floating point math reaches 68,587, and extended instructions hit 19,565. Data compression scores 298,804, data encryption scores 15,916, and random string sorting scores 32,027. Find prime numbers scores 114, and physics scores 1,624.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 35,428. That places the Core 5 213PE in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35,403, a delta of only 0.1 percent. The Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365, a 0.2 percent delta. The Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, a 0.3 percent delta. The Core i7-12700K scores 35,287, a 0.4 percent delta. In every case, the Core 5 213PE is ahead by less than half a percent.

Because the N250 has no recorded benchmark results, there are no direct head-to-head scores to compare. The structural differences in cores, clocks, cache, and memory bandwidth, however, indicate the Core 5 213PE holds a commanding lead in every compute-heavy category.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PE wins in every measured performance category. Multi-threaded workloads benefit from 16 threads and a 24 MB L3 cache. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,468 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26,434 confirm strong parallel throughput. Single-threaded work also favors this chip, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz driving the R23 single-core score of 3,172 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,060.

Memory-heavy tasks favor the Core 5 213PE as well. Dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth gives it a 2x advantage over the N250's 38.4 GB/s. The data compression score of 298,804 and random string sorting score of 32,027 reflect this bandwidth advantage.

The N250 wins in power efficiency. Its 6 watt TDP is less than one-tenth of the Core 5 213PE's 65 watts. For fanless designs, battery-powered devices, or passively cooled embedded systems, this is the deciding factor. Its 0.10 GHz base clock and 3.80 GHz boost clock keep power draw minimal while still providing usable performance for light tasks.

The N250 also wins on platform flexibility in one respect: it supports LPDDR5 memory, which the Core 5 213PE does not. This makes it suitable for compact mobile designs where low-power RAM is standard.

For PCIe expansion, the Core 5 213PE wins clearly with Gen 5 and 16 lanes versus Gen 3 and 9 lanes. For ECC memory, the Core 5 213PE wins as well, since the N250 lacks ECC support entirely.

The integrated graphics are identical, so neither chip wins on GPU capability. Both use UHD Graphics 730.

In summary, the Core 5 213PE dominates compute, memory bandwidth, and expansion. The N250 dominates power consumption and LPDDR5 support. Each processor wins where its architecture is designed to excel.