Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Processor N150 occupy entirely different segments of the desktop and mobile processor markets, respectively. The Core 5 213PE is a high-performance desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the N150 is an ultra-low-power mobile chip with 4 cores and 4 threads. Benchmark data from the database shows a decisive performance gap, with the Core 5 213PE winning all four recorded head-to-head comparisons by substantial margins. The Core 5 213PE also ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs tested, while the N150 sits in the 28th percentile, placing them in different performance classes entirely.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads. This gives the Core 5 213PE a 2x advantage in core count and a 4x advantage in thread count.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 5 213PE scores 3172, which is 239.3% higher than the N150's score of 935. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Core 5 213PE scores 319 versus 153.15 for the N150, a 108.3% advantage.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest recorded margin is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 5 213PE scores 22468 versus 2590.5 for the N150, a 767.3% difference. This reflects the massive core and thread count disparity.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Core 5 213PE uses dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the N150 uses single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Core 5 213PE has exactly double the memory bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory (eccMemory: true), while the N150 does not (eccMemory: false).

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Core 5 213PE boosts up to 5.20 GHz, while the N150 reaches a maximum boost of 3.60 GHz. The Core 5 213PE's boost clock is 1.60 GHz higher.

Specification Differences

The most fundamental difference is the socket and market segment. The Core 5 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment, while the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264 and targets the mobile segment.

Core and thread counts differ sharply: 8 cores and 16 threads for the Core 5 213PE versus 4 cores and 4 threads for the N150. Base clocks are 2.70 GHz versus 0.10 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.20 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. The TDP is 65 W for the Core 5 213PE versus 6 W for the N150, a 59 W difference.

Memory support differs: the Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 with a single-channel bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is available on the Core 5 213PE but not on the N150.

PCIe capability is also different: the Core 5 213PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the N150 provides Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The N150 has a 96 KB per-core L1 cache and a 2 MB shared L2 cache, while the Core 5 213PE has an 80 KB per-core L1 cache and a 2 MB per-core L2 cache. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared on the Core 5 213PE versus 6 MB shared on the N150.

The Core 5 213PE was released on 2026-03-08 with a launch MSRP of $221, while the N150 was released on 2024-11-19 with no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 213PE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, belonging to the Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) generation. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel, but the underlying designs are distinct.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Core 5 213PE uses an 80 KB L1 cache per core, a 2 MB L2 cache per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The N150 uses a larger 96 KB L1 cache per core, but a shared 2 MB L2 cache and a much smaller 6 MB shared L3 cache.

Both processors integrate UHD Graphics 730, so the integrated GPU is identical by name. The Core 5 213PE is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, while the N150 is a mobile part with a 6 W TDP, reflecting the latter's focus on low power consumption.

The Core 5 213PE has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the N150 has 9 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. The N150 also supports LPDDR5 memory in addition to DDR4 and DDR5, which is typical for mobile platforms.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records four direct benchmark comparisons, all won by the Core 5 213PE. The smallest margin is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Core 5 213PE scores 319 against 153.15 for the N150, a 108.3% advantage. This shows that even in a lightly threaded workload, the desktop part has more than double the performance.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core 5 213PE scores 2264 versus 422.5, a 435.9% lead. This is a larger gap than single-core, confirming that the core count and thread count advantage scales well across multiple cores.

The Cinebench R23 single-core test shows a 239.3% advantage for the Core 5 213PE, with scores of 3172 and 935. This is a larger single-core margin than in R15, indicating that the newer test may favor the higher boost clock of the Core 5 213PE.

The most extreme result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 5 213PE scores 22468 against 2590.5 for the N150. This is a 767.3% difference, the largest of any recorded comparison. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 24 MB L3 cache provides a massive advantage over the 4-core, 4-thread N150 with a 6 MB L3 cache.

The average benchmark score for the Core 5 213PE is 35428, while the N150 averages 1025. The nearest rivals for the Core 5 213PE are the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, 0.1% lower), Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.2% lower), Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3% lower), and Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.4% lower). The N150's nearest rivals are the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (1024, 0.1% lower), Intel Core i3-4340 (1026, 0.1% higher), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (1024, 0.1% lower), and Intel Core i7-5650U (1027, 0.2% higher).

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PE wins every recorded workload comparison, so its strengths are universal across the tested benchmarks. It dominates in multi-threaded tasks, as shown by the 435.9% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core and the 767.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The 16 threads and 24 MB L3 cache allow it to handle heavily parallel workloads with ease. Single-threaded performance is also clearly superior, with leads of 108.3% in R15 single-core and 239.3% in R23 single-core.

The N150 does not win any of the four head-to-head benchmarks. Its advantages are not in raw performance but in its physical characteristics. The 6 W TDP is drastically lower than the 65 W TDP of the Core 5 213PE, and the mobile BGA 1264 socket indicates a compact, low-power design. The N150 also supports LPDDR5 memory, which is not listed for the Core 5 213PE. These features are not captured in the benchmark scores but define the N150's role as an energy-efficient mobile processor.

For users prioritizing multi-core throughput, the Core 5 213PE is the clear choice. The data shows a 767.3% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a definitive metric for rendering and compilation workloads. The 85th percentile ranking also places it among high-performing CPUs, while the N150's 28th percentile indicates it is positioned for basic tasks.

The Verdict

The database shows no performance overlap between these two processors. The Core 5 213PE is a high-end desktop part with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and a 24 MB L3 cache. It scores in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35428. Its nearest rivals are all Core i7-class processors, with average scores within 0.4% of its own.

The Intel Processor N150 is a low-power mobile part with 4 cores, 4 threads, a 3.60 GHz boost clock, and a 6 MB L3 cache. It scores in the 28th percentile with an average score of 1025, placing it near older or low-end desktop parts like the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340.

The choice between the two depends entirely on the intended use case. The Core 5 213PE is necessary for any workload that requires significant compute, as evidenced by its 767.3% lead in multi-core rendering. The N150 is suited for scenarios where the 6 W TDP and mobile form factor matter more than performance, such as fanless or battery-powered devices. The benchmark results confirm that the Core 5 213PE is over four times faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core, making it the only option for demanding applications. The N150's single-channel memory bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth further limit its throughput, while the Core 5 213PE's dual-channel 76.8 GB/s bandwidth provides double the memory bandwidth.

For desktop users with compute-heavy tasks, the Core 5 213PE is the only viable choice. For mobile users where power consumption is the primary constraint, the N150 delivers basic performance with a 6 W TDP. The data does not support any other conclusion.