Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Processor 300 occupy completely different positions in the desktop CPU space. The Core 5 213PE is a high-core-count part designed for sustained multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel Processor 300 is a modest dual-core chip aimed at basic computing tasks. The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the two, so the analysis relies on the individual benchmark suites and architectural specifications.

The Core 5 213PE delivers 8 cores and 16 threads, which puts it in a different performance class entirely. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 indicates strong parallel processing capability, and its PassMark multi-thread score of 26434 reinforces that positioning. The Intel Processor 300, with only 2 cores and 4 threads, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its performance profile defined entirely by its specifications rather than measured results.

For single-threaded work, the Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 runs at a fixed 3.90 GHz with no boost clock listed. The higher boost clock on the Core 5 213PE suggests an advantage in lightly threaded applications, although the Intel Processor 300's higher base clock of 3.90 GHz versus 2.70 GHz means it maintains a higher minimum operating frequency. The Core 5 213PE's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3172 and PassMark single-thread score of 4060 show what the architecture can do when a single core is fully utilized.

The Core 5 213PE sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database, placing it well above average. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35403 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 with a 0.2 percent delta, the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 with a 0.3 percent delta, and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 with a 0.4 percent delta. These tight deltas indicate the Core 5 213PE performs essentially on par with those established mid-range and upper-mid-range parts. The Intel Processor 300, at the 50th percentile, lands exactly at the median of the database, which aligns with its entry-level positioning.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's 10 nm process node and are built by Intel's own foundry. The Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Intel Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S. This generation split matters: Bartlett Lake represents a newer design, while Raptor Lake-S is a more established architecture. Both fit the Intel Socket 1700 platform, so they are physically interchangeable in compatible motherboards.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. Cache hierarchies reflect this gap. Both parts share 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: the Core 5 213PE has 2 MB per core, while the Intel Processor 300 has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows the largest divergence, with the Core 5 213PE featuring 24 MB shared versus 6 MB shared on the Intel Processor 300.

The Intel Processor 300 has a listed die size of 163 mm², while the Core 5 213PE has no die size recorded in the database. This is a notable difference in the recorded specifications, as the smaller core count on the Intel Processor 300 allows for a smaller physical die. The Core 5 213PE's larger cache allocation and additional cores naturally require more silicon area, though the exact figure is not recorded.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Processor 300 uses UHD Graphics 710. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Core 5 213PE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Processor 300 has no memory bandwidth figure listed. The Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Thermal design power separates the two clearly: the Core 5 213PE has a 65 W TDP, while the Intel Processor 300 draws 46 W. The Core 5 213PE also has a significantly higher launch MSRP of $221, compared to $82 for the Intel Processor 300. Both parts have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking through multiplier adjustment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Core 5 213PE also supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Processor 300?

A: The Intel Processor 300 has no boost clock listed in the database. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz. The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the Core 5 213PE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1 percent delta), the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (0.2 percent delta), the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (0.3 percent delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 (0.4 percent delta).

Q: Which processor has a smaller L3 cache?

A: The Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both processors on the same socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores versus 2 cores on the Intel Processor 300, and 16 threads versus 4 threads. Base clocks differ as well: the Core 5 213PE runs at 2.70 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 runs at 3.90 GHz. The Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has no boost clock recorded.

TDP values separate the parts by 19 W, with the Core 5 213PE at 65 W and the Intel Processor 300 at 46 W. The codenames differ: Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 213PE and Raptor Lake-S for the Intel Processor 300. L2 cache per core is 2 MB on the Core 5 213PE versus 1.25 MB on the Intel Processor 300. L3 cache is 24 MB shared versus 6 MB shared. The Intel Processor 300 has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while the Core 5 213PE has no die size recorded.

Memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 213PE, with no figure recorded for the Intel Processor 300. ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 213PE but absent on the Intel Processor 300. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PE versus UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel Processor 300. The release dates also differ, with the Core 5 213PE releasing in March 2026 and the Intel Processor 300 releasing in January 2024. The launch MSRP is $221 for the Core 5 213PE and $82 for the Intel Processor 300.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The recorded wins for each side are zero. This absence of direct comparison data means the performance relationship must be inferred from the Core 5 213PE's individual benchmark scores and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The Core 5 213PE's benchmark results paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22468 multi-core and 3172 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 9436 multi-core and 1332 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 2264 multi-core and 319 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 26434, single thread score of 4060, data compression at 298804, data encryption at 15916, extended instructions at 19565, find prime numbers at 114, floating point math at 68587, integer math at 92089, physics at 1624, and random string sorting at 32027. The average benchmark score is 35428.

The Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its performance profile is defined entirely by its specification sheet: 2 cores, 4 threads, a 3.90 GHz base clock, and 6 MB of L3 cache. The Core 5 213PE's 24 MB of L3 cache provides four times the shared cache capacity, which can reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads. The Core 5 213PE's 5.20 GHz boost clock offers a substantial frequency headroom over the Intel Processor 300's fixed 3.90 GHz.

The percentile data places the Core 5 213PE at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300 sits at the 50th percentile. That 35-point percentile gap reflects a wide performance chasm. The Core 5 213PE's nearest rivals all score within 0.4 percent of its average, meaning the database places it in the company of the Intel Core i7-13700T, i7-12700KF, i5-13600T, and i7-12700K. Those are parts with substantially more cores and threads than the Intel Processor 300, reinforcing the separation between the two chips.

The Verdict

The data positions these two processors for entirely different use cases. The Intel Core 5 213PE is a multi-threaded workhorse. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 24 MB of L3 cache, and 5.20 GHz boost clock deliver benchmark results that place it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 35428 puts it in the same performance tier as the Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core i7-12700K, both of which have historically served as capable desktop processors for demanding workloads. The ECC memory support adds suitability for reliability-focused applications, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw reasonable for the performance on offer.

The Intel Processor 300 targets basic desktop duties. Its 2 cores and 4 threads handle everyday computing without excess power consumption, reflected in its 46 W TDP. The 3.90 GHz base clock provides snappy single-threaded response for light tasks, and the 6 MB of L3 cache covers modest workloads. The 50th percentile ranking confirms it sits at the median of the database, which is an appropriate position for an entry-level part. Its smaller 163 mm² die size and lower launch MSRP of $82 reflect its reduced scope.

Users who run multi-threaded applications, compile code, render content, or work with large datasets should choose the Core 5 213PE. The benchmark scores demonstrate substantial parallel capability, and the 85th percentile ranking indicates strong overall performance. Users who need a simple, low-power desktop processor for browsing, office work, and light media consumption should choose the Intel Processor 300. The 46 W TDP keeps system cooling requirements minimal, and the dual-core design is sufficient for those tasks. The choice between these two parts is not a close call; the Core 5 213PE delivers roughly eight times the thread count and a much larger cache, while the Intel Processor 300 offers efficiency and a lower entry point.