Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the dominant performer in this comparison. Benchmark results indicate it wins 16 of the 17 head-to-head tests, with an average benchmark score of 35428 compared to 21952 for the Core Ultra 5 236V. The Core 5 213PE sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 236V sits in the 75th percentile. The data is unambiguous: the Core 5 213PE delivers substantially higher throughput across Cinebench and PassMark workloads, often by margins exceeding 40%.

The Core Ultra 5 236V is the choice for scenarios where the 17 W TDP and mobile form factor (Intel BGA 2833 socket) matter more than raw performance. Its single win in the PassMark find prime numbers test (171 vs 114, a 33.3% advantage) suggests a specific efficiency in certain integer workloads. Its 3 nm process node and TSMC foundry also indicate a more modern manufacturing approach.

For desktop users who need maximum multi-threaded performance, the Core 5 213PE is the clear selection. It offers 16 threads versus 8, a 5.20 GHz boost clock versus 4.70 GHz, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus 8 MB. The data shows no meaningful contest in most workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel lineages. The Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry, and targets the Desktop market segment with an Intel Socket 1700. The Core Ultra 5 236V belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Lunar Lake architecture, is fabricated on a 3 nm node by TSMC, and targets the Mobile segment with an Intel BGA 2833 socket.

Core counts are identical at 8, but threading differs dramatically. The Core 5 213PE supports 16 threads (hyper-threading enabled), while the Core Ultra 5 236V supports only 8 threads. This structural difference explains much of the performance gap in multi-threaded tests.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Core 5 213PE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 236V has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 on the Core 5 213PE gives it a significant advantage in data-heavy workloads.

Memory support differs as well. The Core 5 213PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 236V's memory support is listed as unknown and depends on the motherboard, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. The Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory; the Core Ultra 5 236V does not.

PCIe lanes favor the desktop part. The Core 5 213PE provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 236V provides Gen 5 with only 4 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PE versus Arc 130V on the Core Ultra 5 236V.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent and substantial advantage for the Core 5 213PE. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core 5 213PE scores 2264 versus 1575, a 43.7% lead. The single-core R15 result mirrors this exactly: 319 versus 222, also 43.7%. The R20 tests show the same margin: 9436 versus 6563 in multicore (43.8%) and 1332 versus 926 in single-core (43.8%). Cinebench R23 continues the pattern: 22468 versus 15628 in multicore (43.8%) and 3172 versus 2206 in single-core (43.8%).

PassMark results tell a more varied story. The largest single margin appears in integer math, where the Core 5 213PE scores 92089 versus 38765, a 137.6% advantage. This is the most lopsided result in the dataset. Data compression also shows a wide gap: 298804 versus 176554, a 69.2% lead. Random string sorting favors the Core 5 213PE by 48.1% (32027 versus 21628). Multithread scores show a 43.9% lead (26434 versus 18375). Floating point math favors the Core 5 213PE by 30% (68587 versus 52774). Extended instructions show a 26.6% lead (19565 versus 15451). Data encryption favors the Core 5 213PE by 22% (15916 versus 13049). Physics shows a narrow 8.1% lead (1624 versus 1503). Single-thread PassMark shows only a 4.3% edge (4060 versus 3893).

The Core Ultra 5 236V claims one victory: find prime numbers, where it scores 171 versus 114, a 33.3% advantage. This outlier suggests the Lunar Lake architecture handles that specific calculation more efficiently, but it does not offset the overall trend.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: How many threads does each CPU support?

A: The Core 5 213PE supports 16 threads across 8 cores. The Core Ultra 5 236V supports 8 threads across 8 cores.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 236V has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The Core 5 213PE has a TDP of 65 W. The Core Ultra 5 236V has a TDP of 17 W.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 236V does not.

Q: What is the production status of each?

A: Both are listed as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PE wins across nearly every recorded benchmark category. Its dominance is most pronounced in multi-threaded and integer-heavy workloads. The 137.6% lead in PassMark integer math indicates a major advantage for general computation tasks. The 69.2% lead in data compression and 48.1% lead in random string sorting confirm strengths in data processing and sorting applications. The 43.9% lead in PassMark multithread and consistent 43.7% to 43.8% leads across all three Cinebench versions (R15, R20, R23) demonstrate broad multi-core superiority. Even in single-threaded tests, it leads, though by a smaller margin of 4.3% in PassMark single-thread.

The Core Ultra 5 236V wins only the PassMark find prime numbers test, with a 33.3% advantage. This indicates a specific strength in prime number calculation that may translate to certain mathematical or cryptographic workloads. Its 17 W TDP also makes it the appropriate choice for battery-powered or thermally constrained mobile systems. The 3 nm process node from TSMC suggests a more power-efficient design overall, even though the benchmark scores are lower.

For desktop builds where sustained multi-core performance is required, the Core 5 213PE is the only reasonable choice based on the data. For thin-and-light laptops where power draw is critical, the Core Ultra 5 236V offers a functional balance of efficiency and moderate performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields.

• Threads: Core 5 213PE has 16, Core Ultra 5 236V has 8.
• Base clock: Core 5 213PE runs at 2.70 GHz, Core Ultra 5 236V at 2.10 GHz.
• Boost clock: Core 5 213PE reaches 5.20 GHz, Core Ultra 5 236V reaches 4.70 GHz.
• TDP: Core 5 213PE is rated at 65 W, Core Ultra 5 236V at 17 W.
• Socket: Core 5 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700, Core Ultra 5 236V uses Intel BGA 2833.
• Codename: Core 5 213PE is Bartlett Lake, Core Ultra 5 236V is Lunar Lake.
• Process node: Core 5 213PE uses 10 nm, Core Ultra 5 236V uses 3 nm.
• Foundry: Core 5 213PE is built by Intel, Core Ultra 5 236V by TSMC.
• L1 cache: Core 5 213PE has 80 KB per core, Core Ultra 5 236V has 192 KB per core.
• L2 cache: Core 5 213PE has 2 MB per core, Core Ultra 5 236V has 2.5 MB per core.
• L3 cache: Core 5 213PE has 24 MB shared, Core Ultra 5 236V has 8 MB shared.
• Memory support: Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5, Core Ultra 5 236V depends on motherboard.
• Memory bandwidth: Core 5 213PE has 76.8 GB/s, Core Ultra 5 236V has no recorded figure.
• ECC memory: Core 5 213PE supports it, Core Ultra 5 236V does not.
• PCIe lanes: Core 5 213PE has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, Core Ultra 5 236V has Gen 5 with 4 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: Core 5 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730, Core Ultra 5 236V uses Arc 130V.
• Market segment: Core 5 213PE is Desktop, Core Ultra 5 236V is Mobile.
• Release date: Core 5 213PE released 2026-03-08, Core Ultra 5 236V released 2024-09-23.
• Launch MSRP: Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221. Core Ultra 5 236V has no launch MSRP recorded.