Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T are two desktop processors aimed at similar performance tiers but built on fundamentally different design philosophies. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core 5 213PE wins the majority of tests (10 out of 17) while the Core Ultra 5 225T takes 7 wins. The Core 5 213PE holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 225T sits at the 82nd percentile. The Core 5 213PE posts an average benchmark score of 35428, compared to 30468 for the Core Ultra 5 225T.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE dominates in multi-threaded and integer-heavy workloads. It wins all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, R23, both single-core and multi-core variants) by a consistent margin of 2.2% to 2.3%. Its Passmark integer math score of 92089 is 54.7% higher than the Core Ultra 5 225T's 59543, which represents the largest single-test victory in the entire comparison. The Core 5 213PE also leads in data compression (298804 vs 233998, a 27.7% advantage), multithreaded performance (26434 vs 25358, a 4.2% edge), and random string sorting (32027 vs 28774, an 11.3% lead).

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T counters in several specialized and floating-point tasks. Its Passmark physics score of 2053 beats the Core 5 213PE's 1624 by 20.9%. Floating point math goes to the Core Ultra 5 225T with 82751 versus 68587, a 17.1% advantage. Find prime numbers shows the most dramatic difference: 284 for the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 114 for the Core 5 213PE, a 59.9% gap. The Core Ultra 5 225T also wins data encryption (18289 vs 15916, a 13% lead) and extended instructions (20083 vs 19565, a 2.6% edge). Single-threaded Passmark performance favors the Core Ultra 5 225T at 4348 versus 4060, a 6.6% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use distinct manufacturing processes. The Core 5 213PE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) and is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 225T has a transistor count of 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm², both details that are not listed for the Core 5 213PE.

Core configuration differs significantly. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning it uses simultaneous multithreading. The Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores but only 10 threads, indicating a design without hyperthreading. Despite fewer cores, the Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz versus 4.90 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 225T. Base clocks are closer: 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 213PE and 2.50 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 225T. Both have a 65 W TDP.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core 5 213PE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 225T offers larger per-core caches: 192 KB L1 per core and 3 MB L2 per core, but a smaller 20 MB shared L3. Memory support diverges as well: the Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core Ultra 5 225T supports only DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory; the Core Ultra 5 225T does not.

Platform requirements also differ. The Core 5 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes. The Core Ultra 5 225T requires Intel Socket 1851 and offers Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PE versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU on the Core Ultra 5 225T. The Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221 and was released in March 2026. The Core Ultra 5 225T has no recorded launch MSRP and was released in December 2024. Both are locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite provides the cleanest multi-core comparison. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 213PE scores 22468 against 21971 for the Core Ultra 5 225T, a 2.3% lead. R20 multi-core shows 9436 versus 9227, again a 2.3% difference. R15 multi-core gives 2264 versus 2214, also 2.3%. Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern: R23 at 3172 versus 3101, R20 at 1332 versus 1302, and R15 at 319 versus 312, all showing a 2.2% to 2.3% advantage for the Core 5 213PE.

Passmark multithreaded confirms the trend with 26434 for the Core 5 213PE against 25358 for the Core Ultra 5 225T, a 4.2% gap. Integer math delivers the largest win for the Core 5 213PE at 92089 versus 59543, a 54.7% margin. Data compression shows a 27.7% lead for the Core 5 213PE (298804 vs 233998). Random string sorting favors the Core 5 213PE by 11.3% (32027 vs 28774).

The Core Ultra 5 225T takes its biggest victory in find prime numbers with 284 versus 114, a 59.9% advantage. Physics shows a 20.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T (2053 vs 1624). Floating point math favors the Core Ultra 5 225T by 17.1% (82751 vs 68587). Data encryption goes to the Core Ultra 5 225T by 13% (18289 vs 15916). Extended instructions are close, with the Core Ultra 5 225T ahead by 2.6% (20083 vs 19565). Single-threaded Passmark gives the Core Ultra 5 225T a 6.6% edge (4348 vs 4060).

The Verdict

The recorded data supports distinct use cases for each processor. The Core 5 213PE is the stronger choice for general productivity, multi-threaded rendering, and integer-heavy computations. Its consistent 2.3% lead across all Cinebench versions indicates solid rendering performance, while the 54.7% advantage in integer math and 27.7% lead in data compression make it better suited for compilation, spreadsheet work, and database operations. The 4.2% multithreaded advantage and 11.3% random string sorting lead reinforce this position.

The Core Ultra 5 225T excels in specific computational patterns. Its 59.9% lead in find prime numbers points to superior branch prediction or specialized instruction handling. The 20.9% physics advantage and 17.1% floating point lead suggest better performance in simulation and scientific workloads. The 6.6% single-threaded Passmark win indicates snappier response in lightly threaded applications, and the 13% encryption lead matters for security-focused tasks.

Users on Socket 1700 platforms with DDR4 memory will find the Core 5 213PE a straightforward upgrade path. Those building new systems on Socket 1851 with DDR5-only memory and requiring ECC support should note that ECC is available only on the Core 5 213PE. The Core Ultra 5 225T offers more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) and higher memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s), which benefits systems with multiple NVMe drives or high-throughput memory workloads. The Core 5 213PE has the higher boost clock (5.20 GHz vs 4.90 GHz) and the higher average benchmark score (35428 vs 30468), placing it in the 85th percentile versus 82nd for the Core Ultra 5 225T.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE wins every multi-core Cinebench test. In R23 multi-core it scores 22468 versus 21971 for the Core Ultra 5 225T, a 2.3% advantage. The same 2.3% margin appears in R20 (9436 vs 9227) and R15 (2264 vs 2214).

Q: How do the processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: Cinebench single-core tests go to the Core 5 213PE by 2.2% to 2.3% (R23: 3172 vs 3101, R20: 1332 vs 1302, R15: 319 vs 312). Passmark single-thread reverses the result, with the Core Ultra 5 225T ahead at 4348 versus 4060, a 6.6% lead.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores but only 10 threads. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The additional threads come from simultaneous multithreading on the Core 5 213PE.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 213PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports only DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support.

Q: Which processor performs better in floating-point workloads?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T wins floating point math with 82751 versus 68587, a 17.1% lead. It also wins the physics test (2053 vs 1624, a 20.9% advantage) and find prime numbers (284 vs 114, a 59.9% lead).

Q: Are the processors overclockable?

A: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both the Core 5 213PE and Core Ultra 5 225T are locked parts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PE | Intel Core Ultra 5 225T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not listed |