Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts and thread counts compare between the Intel Core 5 213PE and the Intel Core i9-14901TE?

A: Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core 5 213PE uses a Bartlett Lake design, while the i9-14901TE uses Raptor Lake-R.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 213PE and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How do the integrated graphics differ?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a TDP of 65 watts, whereas the Intel Core i9-14901TE has a lower TDP of 45 watts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700 and are both manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. Both use an 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 80 KB L1 cache per core and 2 MB L2 cache per core. The key architectural distinction lies in the design families: the Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename. The i9-14901TE is explicitly listed as Raptor Lake architecture, whereas the Core 5 213PE does not list a specific architecture name beyond its Bartlett Lake codename.

The most significant architectural difference is in the L3 cache. The i9-14901TE provides 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is 50% larger than the 24 MB shared L3 on the Core 5 213PE. This larger cache pool can reduce memory latency for workloads with sizable working sets.

The i9-14901TE also reports a die size of 257 mm², a specification not listed for the Core 5 213PE. Both processors support dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, ECC memory, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics differ, with the i9-14901TE featuring UHD Graphics 770 versus the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PE.

Power envelopes differ notably. The i9-14901TE has a 45 watt TDP, while the Core 5 213PE has a 65 watt TDP. The i9-14901TE achieves its higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz despite the lower TDP, while the Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz but starts from a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.30 GHz on the i9-14901TE.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the recorded data does include a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core 5 213PE, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark entries in the database.

The Core 5 213PE delivers substantial multi-threaded results. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 22468 points. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 9436, and its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2264. Single-core results show a Cinebench R23 score of 3172, Cinebench R20 score of 1332, and Cinebench R15 score of 319.

The PassMark suite for the Core 5 213PE shows a multi-thread score of 26434 and a single-thread score of 4060. Integer math scores 92089, floating point math scores 68587, and extended instructions score 19565. Data compression scores 298804, data encryption scores 15916, and random string sorting scores 32027. Physics scores 1624, and find prime numbers scores 114.

The Core 5 213PE holds an average benchmark score of 35428 and sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, has an average score of 35403, giving the Core 5 213PE a 0.1% advantage. The Intel Core i7-12700KF trails by 0.2% with an average score of 35365. The Intel Core i5-13600T is 0.3% behind at 35305, and the Intel Core i7-12700K is 0.4% behind at 35287.

The i9-14901TE has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database and a 50th percentile ranking. Without any recorded benchmark scores, a direct quantitative comparison cannot be made. The data indicates the i9-14901TE has no nearest rivals listed, and its benchmark arrays are empty.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

Clocks: The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

TDP: The Core 5 213PE is rated at 65 watts. The i9-14901TE is rated at 45 watts.

Codename: The Core 5 213PE uses Bartlett Lake. The i9-14901TE uses Raptor Lake-R.

Architecture: The Core 5 213PE does not list an architecture. The i9-14901TE lists Raptor Lake.

Generation: The Core 5 213PE is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The i9-14901TE is listed as Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Die size: The Core 5 213PE does not list a die size. The i9-14901TE lists 257 mm².

L3 cache: The Core 5 213PE has 24 MB shared. The i9-14901TE has 36 MB shared.

Memory bandwidth: The Core 5 213PE lists 76.8 GB/s. The i9-14901TE does not list a memory bandwidth value.

Integrated graphics: The Core 5 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

Release date: The Core 5 213PE was released on 2026-03-08. The i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30.

Launch MSRP: The Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221. The i9-14901TE does not have a launch MSRP listed.

Part number: The Core 5 213PE is SA4QG. The i9-14901TE is Q49CSRNJJ.

Series: The Core 5 213PE has no series listed. The i9-14901TE is in the Core 14th Gen series.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core 5 213PE strengths: The recorded benchmarks show this processor at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong measured performance across the tested workloads. Its multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 22468 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26434 place it in a competitive position against its nearest rivals, all of which fall within 0.4% of its average score. The higher base clock of 2.70 GHz may benefit workloads that rely on sustained lower-frequency operation. The 65 watt TDP suggests a less constrained power envelope relative to the i9-14901TE, which might allow for more consistent performance under sustained load. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded specification that could support memory-sensitive workloads. The launch MSRP of $221 provides a reference point for its market positioning.

Intel Core i9-14901TE strengths: The 5.50 GHz boost clock is higher than the 5.20 GHz on the Core 5 213PE, which could favor lightly threaded workloads that reach boost frequencies. The 36 MB L3 cache is 12 MB larger than the 24 MB on the Core 5 213PE, potentially benefiting applications with large data sets that fit within cache. The 45 watt TDP is lower, which may be relevant for constrained thermal environments. The UHD Graphics 770 is a step up from the UHD Graphics 730. The earlier release date of 2024-06-30 means this processor has been in the market longer.

Benchmark data absence: The i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking sits at 50. This means the database contains no measured evidence of its performance in Cinebench or PassMark tests. The Core 5 213PE, by contrast, has a complete benchmark profile. Any conclusion about the i9-14901TE's performance must rely on its architectural specifications rather than measured results.

The Verdict

The database presents an unusual case: one processor with a full set of measured benchmarks and another without any recorded scores. The Intel Core 5 213PE demonstrates measurable performance through its Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 results, along with a broad PassMark suite. Its average benchmark score of 35428 and 85th percentile ranking place it among competitive desktop processors, with nearest rivals within a 0.4% margin.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE offers a higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, lower TDP, and newer integrated graphics. These specifications suggest potential advantages in single-threaded burst workloads and cache-sensitive applications. The 36 MB L3 cache and 5.50 GHz boost clock are the strongest recorded differentiators in its favor.

For users relying on measured performance data, the Core 5 213PE is the only one of the two with verified benchmark results. Its 24 MB L3 cache and 5.20 GHz boost clock, combined with the 85th percentile standing, provide a concrete performance reference. The higher 65 watt TDP may be a consideration for power-constrained systems.

For users prioritizing the recorded architectural advantages of the i9-14901TE, the larger 36 MB L3 cache and higher 5.50 GHz boost clock are the standout specifications. The 45 watt TDP makes it a lower-power option on paper. The absence of benchmark data means its actual performance relative to the Core 5 213PE cannot be confirmed from the database. The earlier release date of 2024-06-30 indicates a longer market presence.

The data supports choosing the Core 5 213PE when measured benchmark results matter most, as it is the only processor with recorded performance scores. The data supports choosing the i9-14901TE when larger cache capacity, higher boost frequency, lower power draw, and newer integrated graphics take priority, with the understanding that its performance in the database is unverified.